Case law

City of Gainesville v. Florida Power & Light Co.

488 F. Supp. 1258 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Apr 18, 1980

See United States v. … See, e. g., Cannon v.

Bacon v. STIEFEL LABORATORIES, INC.

677 F. Supp. 2d 1331 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 4, 2010

The Committee members and the Trustee are appointed by the Company’s board of directors (the Trustee is currently defendant Charles W. … Co. v.

ARSLAN v. Florida International University

District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 30, 2025

Fla. 2020) (“[I]n Florida, a public university’s board of trustees is the proper entity to be named in lawsuits against the university.”); McGirt v. Broward Coll., No. 15-62324-CIV, 2016 WL 1161093, at *1 n.1 (S.D. … Nat’l Ass’n of the Deaf v. Fla., 980 F.3d 763, 770 (11th Cir. 2020). The Plaintiff does not dispute that FIU’s Board of Trustees is an arm of the state.

In Re the Complaint of Levenshon

407 F. Supp. 2d 1349 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Dec 28, 2005

The motion to increase security on the M/V Satori [D.E. 6] filed by Michelle Randall, as personal representative of the Estate of Brian Randall, is DENIED. … See generally Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1427 (11th Cir.1994) (explaining that “statements and arguments of counsel are not evidence”) (quoting United States v.

Burnup & Sims, Inc. v. Posner

688 F. Supp. 1532 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 29, 1988

See e.g., Copperweld Corp. v. … Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Edelman, 666 F.Supp. 799 (M.D.N.C.1987); Carter Hawley Hale Stores, Inc. v. The Limited, Inc., 587 F.Supp. 246, 250 (C.D.Cal.1984).

Ray v. United States Dept. of Justice

725 F. Supp. 502 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Apr 13, 1989

Robles v. … Senate of the Commonwealth, 823 F.2d at 580 , quoting Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. Renegotiation Board, 482 F.2d 710, 722 (D.C.Cir.1973).

Andrx Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. GlaxoSmithKline, PLC

236 F.R.D. 583 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 7, 2006

(citing Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465, 1470 (9th Cir.1992)). … See Chan v.

United States v. Marder

208 F. Supp. 3d 1296 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 23, 2016

—a double board certified dermatologist based in Palm Beach County, Florida—brought this action as Relator 1 on behalf of the United States (the “Government”) under the False Claims Act, (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733 . … Kendall is a board certified pathologist operating an independent laboratory, KML, in Coral Gables, Florida, which is approximately 130 miles from Dr. Marder’s offices. Dr.

Del Valle v. Sanchez

170 F. Supp. 2d 1254 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 25, 2001

Apr. 13, 2001) (finding that physician was employee under FTCA when United States advocated that position); Brown v. Health Svc., Inc., 971 F.Supp. 518 (M.D.Ala.1997) (same); Costa v. United States Dept. of Vet. … Izquierdo v.

Tynes v. Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 13, 2025

(citing Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 895 (1984)); see also ACLU v. Barnes, 168 F.3d 423, 438 (11th Cir. 1999) (“The significant disparity in their experience should be reflected in the rates awarded.”); Brown v. … “If the court concludes that the number of claimed hours is excessive, it may engage in ‘an across-the-board cut,’ so long as it provides adequate explanation for the decrease.” Galdames v. N & D Inv. Corp., 432 F.

Bisbee v. Fahs

80 F. Supp. 929 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 15, 1948

Of this the Board of Tax Appeals approved. … Beatty v. Com’r, 28 B. T. A. 1286; Com’r v. Pearson, 3 Cir., 154 F.2d 256 ; Com’r v. Wade, 2 Cir., 155 F.2d 918 ; Rathborne v. Comm., 37 B. T. A. 607, affirmed by 5 Cir., 103 F.2d 301 . 26 U.S.C.A. § 162 (b); Freuler v.

Arnold v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

987 F. Supp. 1463 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Oct 21, 1997

Investment Company Institute v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 551 F.2d 1270, 1279-80 (D.C.Cir.1977). The Commission, however, has not issued a final order in this action. Kabeller, Inc. v. … Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co., 415 U.S. 1, 24 , 94 S.Ct. 1028, 1040 , 39 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); Rosenthal & Company v.

Shabazz v. Jpay Securus Inc.

District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 3, 2023

CASE No. 23-cv-22882-BLOOM ISMAIL SHABAZZ, Plaintiff, v. … See Brown v. Blackwater River Corr. Facility, 762 F. App’x 982, 985 (11th Cir. 2019) (“[A] district court may sua sponte dismiss a suit for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with an order.”).

Abrams-Jackson v. Avossa

282 F. Supp. 3d 1268 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Oct 13, 2017

Leigh v. Avossa, Case No. 16-81624-CIV, 2017 WL 2799617 , at *10 (S.D. Fla. June 28, 2017) ; Leigh v. Avossa, Case No. 16-81624-CIV, 2017 WL 3671559 , at *4 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 24, 2017). Likewise, in Leigh v. … Leigh to Lisa Kohring, Esq., one of the Palm Beach School Board's attorneys, in an separate case, Parish-Carter v. Avossa, et al. See DE 86-1. In the email, Mr. Leigh accused Ms. Kohring of criminal wrongdoing.

Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.

271 F. Supp. 689 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 21, 1967

Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328 U.S. 575, 581 , 66 S.Ct. 1176 , 1179, 90 L.Ed. 1447 (1946). See Bush v. Orleans Parish School Board, 191 F.Supp. 871, 878 (E.D.La.1961). … In Campbell v.

Banco Santander International v. Pamasa S.A., Barbara Mansilla Ortiz, Valerie Mansilla Ortiz, and Francisco Omar Mansilla Ortiz; Francisco Omar Mansilla Ortiz v. Pamasa S.A., Barbara Mansilla Ortiz, and Valerie Mansilla Ortiz

District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 7, 2026

“On April 11, 2021, Valerie filed an amparo against the Board of Directors of Pamasa[.]” Id. ¶ 28. … Brown, 319 F.3d 1302, 1310 n.24 (11th Cir. 2003) (“[T]ort law . . . is rife with nuances that are not consistently found throughout all jurisdictions.

Ahussien v. Lynch

District Court, S.D. Florida · Jun 6, 2023

CASE NO. 23-cv-61072-BLOOM MUSAB MOHAMED ALHUSSEIN, Plaintiff, v. … See Brown v. Blackwater River Corr. Facility, 762 F. App’x 982, 985 (11th Cir. 2019) (“[A] district court may sua sponte dismiss a suit for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with an order.”).

Cotromano ex rel. Cotromano v. United Technologies Corp.

7 F. Supp. 3d 1253 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 24, 2014

Plaintiffs cite Gilberg v. … A plain reading of the Price-Anderson Act contradicts the Gilberg court’s flawed reasoning, as pointed out by the Fifth Circuit in Acuna v. Brown & Root, Inc., 200 F.3d 335 (5th Cir.2000) and in Carey v.

Acevedo v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 2062

174 F. Supp. 2d 1327 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 27, 2001

Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, 461 U.S. at 766 , 103 S.Ct. 2177 . … See Brown v. Rauscher Pierce Refsnes, Inc., 994 F.2d 775, 782 (11th Cir.1993). Here, the arbitration awards does not or *1330 der any party to take action which violates public policy.

MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. v. Microsoft Corp.

804 F. Supp. 2d 1271 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 17, 2011

BROWN, United States Chief Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER came before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Transfer this *1274 Action to the Western District of Washington (D.E. 62). … Windmere Corp. v.