Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersflmd

5,201 results

1.07s

  • Salcedo

    District Court, M.D. Florida · Jul 13, 2026

    THE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES SOUTHWESTERN STATE COLLEGE, FLORIDA, … Libel v. Adventure Lands of Am., Inc., 482 F.3d 1028, 1032 (8th Cir. 2007).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Touchston v. McDermott

    120 F. Supp. 2d 1055 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Nov 15, 2000

    Hennings v. … In Hubbard v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brooks v. Wainwright

    439 F. Supp. 1335 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Nov 11, 1977

    Brown, 334 So.2d 355, 356 (1st D.C.A.Fla.1976), cert. den. 344 So.2d 323 (Fla.1977); Stephenson v. … Fla.Stat. § 447.203(3) (Supp.1975) provided: (3) “Public employee” means any person, employed by a public employer except: (a) Those persons appointed by the governor or elected by the people, agency heads, members of boards

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Health Center of Lake City, Inc.

    252 F. Supp. 2d 1336 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Feb 5, 2003

    The first-served rule was articulated by the Fifth Circuit in Brown v. Demco, Inc., 792 F.2d 478 (5th Cir.1986), and Getty Oil Corp. v. Ins. Co. of N.A., 841 F.2d 1254 (5th Cir.1988). … In Collings v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Maschmeier v. Scott

    508 F. Supp. 2d 1180 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Jun 28, 2007

    If that is the case, this Court would apply the expressive conduct analysis as set by the Supreme Court in Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). … Although not controlling, the Court notes that plaintiffs counsel stipulated that the Civil Service Board was the final policy maker and not Sheriff Scott in the case of Partington v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Stephens

    District Court, M.D. Florida · Aug 24, 2026

    See Dep't of Child. & Fams. v. Herstein, 399 So. 3d 384 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2025). And because this Court is applying state law, that decision is generally controlling. See United States v. … Woods v. Interstate Realty Co., 337 U.S. 535, 537 (1949); see also Bravo v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. v. Ciba Vision Corp.

    712 F. Supp. 2d 1285 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Apr 27, 2010

    See Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. v. … In eBay Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hamman

    District Court, M.D. Florida · Dec 15, 2025

    Case No: 6:25-cv-2102-AGM-LHP UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES, Defendant … See Moore v. Adventist Health Sys. Sunbelt Healthcare Corp., No. 6:23-cv-1163-PGB-DCI, 2023 WL 4947933, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 3, 2023).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Colony Beach & Tennis Club, Ltd. v. Colony Beach & Tennis Club Ass'n

    456 B.R. 545 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Jul 27, 2011

    Co. v. … Ass’n v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Killinger-Smith

    District Court, M.D. Florida · Feb 24, 2026

    Case No: 6:25-cv-1982-CEM-DCI OSCEOLA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Defendant. … See Rodriguez v. Allstate Ins. Co., No. 11-21042-CIV, 2011 WL 13223708, at *3 (S.D. Fla. May 23, 2011), report and recommendation adopted in part, No. 11-21042-CIV, 2011 WL 13223734 (S.D. Fla.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Colonial Daytona Ltd. Partnership v. American Savings of Florida

    152 B.R. 996 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Apr 1, 1993

    V. WHETHER APPELLEE, AMERICAN SAVINGS’ EXHIBITS SHOULD BE STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD OF APPEAL. … Wade v. State of Arizona, 948 F.2d 1122 (9th Cir.1991). III.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Carson

    401 F. Supp. 835 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Jul 17, 1975

    Brown and John R. … Finney v. Arkansas Board of Correction, 505 F.2d 194, 201 (8th Cir. 1974). To the same effect are: Hamilton v.

    Cited 53 timesPublished
  • Rios

    District Court, M.D. Florida · Feb 4, 2026

    Griffin v. Swim-Tech Corp., 722 F.2d 677, 680 (11th Cir. 1984). … Woods v. Sec’y, Dep’t of Corr., No. 8:13-CV-728-T-30TGW, 2014 WL 1292864, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 28, 2014) (citing United States v. Reyes, 307 F.3d 451, 456-57 (6th Cir. 2002)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Garrison v. City of Lakeland

    954 F. Supp. 246 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Jan 13, 1997

    The Fifth Circuit enforced the Board’s order. Hudgens v. NLRB, 501 F.2d 161 (5th Cir. 1974). … Lechmere, Inc. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Sanders v. Grand Union Co.

    541 F. Supp. 621 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Jun 21, 1982

    Mitchell, id.; Davidson v. … the finality of the Arbitration Board’s decision as it related to him.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Oakley

    District Court, M.D. Florida · Mar 4, 2026

    See Pears v. Mobile Cnty., 645 F. Supp. 2d 1062, 1090 (S.D. … See Abel v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Keys v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Ret. Plan

    387 F. Supp. 3d 1372 · District Court, M.D. Florida · May 28, 2019

    Accord Wright v. Aetna Life Ins. … See Linder v. Portocarrero , 963 F.2d 332 , 334 (11th Cir. 1992) ; Quality Foods de Centro Am., S.A. v. Latin Am. Agribusiness Dev. Corp. S.A. , 711 F. 2d 989 , 994 (11th Cir. 1983).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • School Bd. of Lee County v. ES

    561 F. Supp. 2d 1282 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Mar 10, 2008

    561 F.Supp.2d 1282 (2008) SCHOOL BOARD OF LEE COUNTY, Florida, Plaintiff, v. … B. v. Milford Board of Education, 103 F.3d at 1122.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kearney Partners Fund, LLC ex rel. Lincoln Partners Fund, LLC v. United States

    946 F. Supp. 2d 1302 · District Court, M.D. Florida · May 22, 2013

    Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 295 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). As a general matter, “an administrative agency is not a slave of its rules.” Health Sys. Agency of Okla. v. … The Supreme Court held that Accardi was entitled to a new hearing before the Board because the Attorney General had supplanted the Board’s independent discretion and had dictated the Board’s decision to remove the 'petitioner

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • J.C.F.C.

    District Court, M.D. Florida · Jul 24, 2026

    Board (Count IV), negligent retention as to the School Board (Count V), parental damages for care and treatment of minor child as to the School Board (Count VI), Fourteenth Amendment violation as to Johnson (Count VII … Hartley, 193 F.3d at 1269 (quoting Brown v. Crawford, 906 F.2d 667, 671 (11th Cir. 1990)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.