Case law

Duran v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

98 So. 3d 1174 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 16, 2012

The school board was not required to place her in a full-time position. The school board representative testified at the hearing that because Ms. … Brown v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 81 So.3d 646 , (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

Nikolits v. Hanna

92 So. 3d 299 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 18, 2012

.”); Nikolits v. … See Ward v.

Student Alpha Id No. Guja v. SCH. BD. OF VOLUSIA CTY.

616 So. 2d 1011 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 26, 1993

Instead, possession was arbitrarily deemed by the Board to be a "necessarily included lesser offense" of distribution and appellant was expelled. *1016 In Brown v. … In Walter v.

Pan v. State, Department of Health, Board of Acupuncture

810 So. 2d 544 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 13, 2002

We affirm the final order of the Board of Acupuncture revoking the appellant’s license to practice acupuncture where there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the same. … See Carter v. Dep’t. of Prof. Reg., Bd. of Optometry, 633 So.2d 3 (Fla.1994); Ong v. Dept. of Prof. Reg., Bd. of Dentistry, 565 So.2d 1384 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Gordon v. Savage, 383 So.2d 646 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Faircloth v. Bliss

917 So. 2d 1005 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 4, 2006

Factually similar to the case at bar, however, is our decision in Brown v. School Board of Palm Beach County, 855 So.2d 1267 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). … In Brown , like the present case, the trial court relied upon the unsworn statements of the attorneys in awarding attorneys fees.

Clugston v. State

765 So. 2d 816 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 9, 2000

Based in part on Paolillo's statement, the governor and four members of the clemency board granted appellant a conditional commutation of sentence, requiring him to be supervised by a probation officer in Maryland, where … Hallman v. State, 371 So.2d 482 (Fla.1979), abrogated on other grounds, Jones v. State, 591 So.2d 911 (Fla.1991).

Wachovia Securities, LLC v. Vogel

918 So. 2d 1004 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 20, 2006

"An arbitration board that incorrectly interprets the law has not manifestly disregarded it. It has simply made a legal mistake. … However, a similar "manifest disregard" challenge was rejected in Brown v. ITT Consumer Financial Corp., 211 F.3d 1217 (11th Cir.2000).

Jones v. Miami Herald Media Co.

198 So. 3d 1143 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 29, 2016

See Bd. of Trustees, Jacksonville Police & Fire Pension Fund v. Lee, 189 So.3d 120, 125 (Fla. 2016) (quoting Lightbourne v. McCollum, 969 So.2d 326, 332-33 (Fla.2007)); Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n v. … Lorei v.

JOSIE MACHOVEC v. PALM BEACH COUNTY

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 27, 2021

Browning dealt with an incompetent patient’s ability (through his surrogate) to terminate artificial life support measures. 568 So. 2d at 17. Another case cited in Appellants’ initial brief, R.C. v. … Davis v. City of S.

Garrido v. State

97 So. 3d 291 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 12, 2012

Garrido claims that giving the standard jury instruction without revision was reversible error based on this Court’s decisions in Bassallo v. State, 46 So.3d 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), and Brown v. … Moore v. State, 903 So.2d 341, 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Second, the State misses the import of our decision in Bassallo and Brown .

Glagola v. State, Construction Industry Licensing Board, Department of Business & Professional Regulation

22 So. 3d 618 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 24, 2009

See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). WEBSTER, BENTON, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Aikens v. Robison

198 So. 2d 112 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 31, 1967

City of Panama City v. Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund

418 So. 2d 1132 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 16, 1982

See Grove Isle, Ltd. v. Bayshore Homeowners’ Assn., Inc., 418 So.2d 1046 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). … Organizations v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150, 153 , 90 S.Ct. 827, 830 , 25 L.Ed.2d 184, 188 (1970).

Webb v. Town Council of Town of Hilliard

766 So. 2d 1241 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 25, 2000

See Park of Commerce Assoc. v. City of Delray Beach, 636 So.2d 12, 15 (Fla.1994); Board of County Commissioners v. Snyder, 627 So.2d 469, 474 (Fla. 1993); Grace v. … JOANOS, PADOVANO and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR. NOTES [1] The Hilliard Town Code sets forth the following procedure for obtaining a variance: Sec. 62-181. Written application.

City of Clearwater v. Bonsey

180 So. 2d 200 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Nov 16, 1965

180 So.2d 200 (1965) CITY OF CLEARWATER, a Municipal Corporation, Appellant, v. John W. BONSEY, A.L. Anderson, Robert L. Davis, Lloyd B. Hopkins and Robert A. … Brown, Norris S. Gould, Clearwater, and Howard P. Macfarlane, Arthur A. Simpson and Wm. Terrell Hodges, of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, for appellant. Page S. Jackson and Julian R.

Hektner v. Sch. Bd. of Brevard Cnty.

247 So. 3d 421 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 11, 2018

Beanblossom v. School Baord of Bay County

190 So. 3d 699 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 20, 2016

THOMAS L. RHYMESTINE v. THE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MIAMI DADE COLLEGE, FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 29, 2023

Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510, 309 So. 3d 192, 193 (Fla. 2020) (quoting Anderson v. … Louis v. Fla.

Miller v. EVERGREEN LAKES HOMEOWNERS ASS'N

19 So. 3d 1089 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 7, 2009

See Padow v. … We find that pursuant to George v.

Rudloe v. Karl

899 So. 2d 1161 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 7, 2005

David Michael KARL, Individually, and The Florida State University Board of Trustees, Appellees. No. 1D03-4651. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. April 7, 2005. *1162 H. … Like the supreme *1165 court in City of Pinellas Park v. Brown, 604 So.2d 1222, 1226 (Fla.1992), "we cannot accept petitioners' argument in favor of sovereign immunity in this case.