Case law

In Re Dubreuil

603 So. 2d 538 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 8, 1992

Clearly, such cases involve the destruction of potential life and raise different questions than do the facts here. … By a footnote the court made clear that it would not qualify that right based upon a designation of a medical procedure as major or minor. Id. at 11, n. 6.

Baker v. State

425 So. 2d 36 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 8, 1982

Such was clearly relevant to the issue of insanity. Jones v. State, 332 So.2d 615 (Fla. 1976). … the former are also required to be proven, along with more, to establish the latter.

Carter v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Optometry

613 So. 2d 78 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 26, 1993

This finding is clearly supported by the record in this case. … Third, it is apparent from the arguments and my review of the record that Appellant established a prima facie case for relief based on his motion to dismiss in that he established at least four definitive violations of the

Zorc v. City of Vero Beach

722 So. 2d 891 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 2, 1998

Pending Litigation As to the first element of section 286.011(8), we find that the City's involvement in the Piper bankruptcy proceedings qualified as "pending litigation" within the meaning of the statute. … Once the violation is established, prejudice is presumed. See Port Everglades Auth. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 1922-1, 652 So.2d 1169,1171 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

MYRTLE GANNON v. JOHN CUCKLER, M. D.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 16, 2019

And in general, Florida courts have interpreted and applied the rule in accord with the understanding its text clearly conveys. See, e.g., Crownover v. … Gannon's jurisdictional allegation qualifies as a bona fide denial, that denial is insufficient to save its personal jurisdiction defense from the waiver provisions of rules 1.140(b) and (h).

Florida Department of Children & Families v. Adoption of X.X.G.

45 So. 3d 79 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 22, 2010

Rekers’ work did not meet established standards in the field. R. 916-18. Another expert, Dr. Peplau, testified that Dr. … Clearly, this is a distinction without a difference.” Brief at 13. .

GEORGE O. SHRADER v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 23, 2019

as the Happy Days Lounge to another establishment known as the East Side Lounge. … - 13 - Clearly, the DNA evidence left behind in his blood and semen contradicts that version of events. Shrader's inconsistencies do not stop there.

Payne v. City of Miami

53 So. 3d 258 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 8, 2010

not simultaneously establish an immediate minimum limit on the possible intensity of land use. … If the City’s vision for the Miami River has changed, then that change should be clearly reflected in its Comprehensive Plan to provide industries and land owners along the Miami River with fair notice. Id.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Smith

198 So. 3d 852 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 3, 2016

See, e.g., Harrington, 154 So. 3d at 1112 (describing a "long line of well- established precedent" under which a vehicle cannot be treated as "both insured and uninsured under the same policy"); Smith v. … Indeed, without the exclusion, the Nissan clearly qualified as an uninsured motor vehicle because Smith had been denied coverage under the Motzenbecker policy: UNINSURED MOTOR VEHICLE─COVERAGES U and U3