Case law

Brown v. Sohn

276 So. 2d 501 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 24, 1973

The Alabama Supreme Court in Puryear v. Smith, 233 Ala. 505 , 173 So. 17 (1937), was presented with the identical question of whether the description of the land as set out in the bill of complaint was sufficient.

Brown v. State

272 So. 2d 179 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 24, 1973

See Brill v. State, 159 Fla. 682 , 32 So.2d 607 ; State ex rel. Roberts v. Cochran, Fla.1962, 140 So.2d 597 ; Crossin v. State, Fla.App.1971, 244 So.2d 142 . Affirmed.

Brown v. State

271 So. 2d 779 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 3, 1973

This court, preceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v.

Mercer v. Brown

190 So. 2d 610 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 11, 1966

On the other hand, expert testimony was given by employees of the State Department of Agriculture, the State Board of Health, and the State Veterinarian to the effect that the farm was being operated under the most modern … In Beckman v.

Brown v. State

268 So. 2d 180 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 31, 1972

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v.

Brown v. Jupiter Hospital

648 So. 2d 313 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 10, 1995

Brown sustained an industrial injury on February 23, 1991. … In so ruling, the judge cited this court’s opinion in Litvin v. St. Lucie County Sheriff's Department, 599 So.2d 1353 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), but did not have the benefit of our very recent decision in Bridges v.

EDWARD REVENOUS BROWN v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 24, 2021

________________ No. 3D20-1939 Lower Tribunal No. 14-700 ________________ Edward Revenous Brown … Edward Revenous Brown, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before LINDSEY, HENDON and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

Brown v. State

247 So. 2d 442 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 16, 1971

Affirmed on the authority of Stein-hauser v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 446 . PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.

Brown v. State

246 So. 2d 151 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 6, 1971

Regarding the absence of counsel for the defendant at the time of preliminary hearing, it appears that the hearing occurred prior to the date of the decision of Coleman v. … We reject that contention on the authority of Miller v. State, Fla.App.1971, 246 So.2d 169 . Affirmed.

Brown v. State

219 So. 2d 113 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 1, 1969

Douglas v. State, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 653 , relied on by the appellant is not applicable here, as the record sufficiently shows intent of the appellant to participate.

Brown v. Purdy

222 So. 2d 239 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 29, 1969

See Freeman v. Blackburn, Fla.1957, 92 So.2d 262 ; Kuney v. State, 88 Fla. 354 , 102 So. 547 (1924); Pecnik v. Blackburn, Fla.App.1961, 132 So.2d 604 . … Hackler v. Lohman, 17 Ill.2d 78 , 160 N.E.2d 792, 1959 . The order herein appealed be and the same is, therefore, Affirmed.

Van Deventer v. Brown

561 So. 2d 469 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 23, 1990

After reviewing appellants’ initial brief in which appellants concede that our decision in Aspen v. … We further note that the Fifth District Court of Appeal has certified conflict to the supreme court on this issue in Hough v. Huffman, 555 So.2d 942 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). Affirmed.

Brown v. Florida Parole Commission

763 So. 2d 1262 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 6, 2000

763 So.2d 1262 (2000) Kevin V. BROWN, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, et al., Appellees. No. 1D00-771. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. July 6, 2000. Kevin V. Brown, appellant, pro se. … See, Brown v. State, 708 So.2d 1041 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Snelson v. Snelson, 440 So.2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). DISMISSED. BARFIELD, C.J., KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Brown v. State

181 So. 2d 562 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 4, 1966

The law concerning the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence is stated in Pacetti v. … Allen v. State, Fla.App.1960, 124 So.2d 741 . For the reasons stated the judgment is Reversed.

Brown v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

81 So. 3d 646 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 16, 2012

Brown has been employed by the Hillsborough County School Board as a substitute teacher since November 2008. … Brown is not eligible for unemployment compensation benefits for the period between academic years. See Parzik v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 711 So.2d 636, 636 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Company

252 So. 2d 817 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 30, 1971

252 So.2d 817 (1971) James BROWN, Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation, and Universal Firearms Corporation, a Florida Corporation, Appellees. No. O-203. … NOTES [1] Rule 1.190, F.R.C.P., 30 F.S.A. [2] Maiden v. Carter (Fla.App. 1970), 234 So.2d 168 ; Richards v. West (Fla.App. 1959), 110 So.2d 698 . [3] Warfield v.

MARIA BROWN v. LOUIS VARRICCHIO

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 24, 2019

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MARIA BROWN, Appellant, v.

Ted K. Brown, former husband v. Valerie Hays Brown, Former Wife

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 25, 2015

CASE NO. 1D14-4819 v. … Brown, pro se, Appellant. No appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. MARSTILLER, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.

Brown v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

633 So. 2d 36 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 4, 1994

In Byrd v. … Brown refused to return to work. [4] See, e.g., Uniweld, 277 So.2d at 829 ; see also Break 'n Eat Corp. v.

Lasher Milling Company v. Brown

427 So. 2d 1034 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 22, 1983

427 So.2d 1034 (1983) LASHER MILLING COMPANY and Florida Farm Bureau, Appellants, v. Ken BROWN, Appellee. No. AM-209. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. February 22, 1983. … In making this argument, the E/C rely in part on a theory recently rejected by this court in Regency Inn v.