Case law

Carter v. Lynn

401 F. Supp. 1383 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 15, 1975

This case is very similar to Brown v. General Services Administration, 507 F.2d 1300 (2d Cir. 1974). Upon facts substantially the same as in this case, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the E.E.O. … Again, Brown v. General Services Administration, supra, has addressed this argument.

Midway Clover Farm Market, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

318 F. Supp. 375 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 24, 1969

Kyne, 358 U.S. 184 , 79 S.Ct. 180 , 3 L.Ed.2d 210 (1959) ), (2) where the Board has violated a constitutional right of the plaintiff (Fay v. … Brown Lumber Co., 336 F.2d 641 (C.A.6, 1954). 3. Plaintiff has also failed to demonstrate that the Board has violated its constitutional rights.

Indiana ex rel. Indiana State Board of Public Welfare v. Ewing

99 F. Supp. 734 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 7, 1951

The basis of the Federal Administrator’s determination is found in the recent amendment to the Indiana Welfare Act, Acts 1936, Sp.Sess., c. 3, § 93, as amended by Acts 1951, c. 321, which requires the county welfare board … One of the more recent expressions is found in Hammond v. Hull, 76 U.S.App. D.C. 301, 303, 131 F.2d 23, 25 , in an opinion by Mr.

United Church Board for World Ministries v. Securities & Exchange Commission

649 F. Supp. 492 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 25, 1986

Cinciarelli v. Reagan, 729 F.2d 801, 806 (D.C.Cir.1984). … See Muth v. Marsh, 525 F.Supp. 604, 609 (D.D.C.1981).

Greenspan v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 2022

See Abtew v. DHS, 808 F.3d 895, 899 (D.C. … And unlike in Muttit v.

Peterson v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

51 F. Supp. 3d 72 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 23, 2014

Civil Action No. 14-1053 (UNA) BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, Defendant. … Summers v. Earth Island Inst., 555 U.S. 488, 493 (2009) (citing Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 498-99 (1975)).

Lincoln Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

670 F. Supp. 449 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 2, 1987

In Independent Bankers Ass’n of America v. … Ass’n of U.S., Inc. v. E.P.A., 768 F.2d 385 , 389 n. 6 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, American Methyl Cory. v. Motor Vehicle Mfrs.

Scott v. England

264 F. Supp. 2d 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 29, 2002

E.g., Tulare County v. Bush, 306 F.3d 1138, 1142 (D.C.Cir.2002) (internal citations omitted); Lawrence v. Dunbar, 919 F.2d 1525, 1529 (11th Cir.1990). … See Brown v. General Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 833-35 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976) (explaining the purpose behind exhaustion of remedies in the Title VII employment-discrimination context); Brown v.

Myer, III v. Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 13, 2025

Ho v. Garland, 106 F.4th 47, 50 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)). The Court must consider “a pro se litigant’s complaint ‘in light of’ all filings,” Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. … James v. Hurson Assocs., Inc. v. Glickman, 229 F.3d 277, 284 (D.C. Cir. 2000).

Vhs Acquisition Subsidiary Number 7, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 17, 2024

Saint Vincent claims that the Board’s pursuit of damages infringes upon its Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial. Id. at 19 (citing Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. 462, 489 (2011) and Sec. Exch. Comm’n v. … Saint Vincent’s beef with the Board is due to its conflict with the Union. In other words, the present constitutional claims “would not exist but for the underlying [Board charges].” Armco, Inc. v.

United States v. Philip Morris Inc.

116 F. Supp. 2d 116 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2000

Currently, only one person sits on the board of both companies. Similarly, the overlap between the [BAT Ind.] and Brown & Williamson boards of directors has been minimal and currently no member sits on both boards. … (Neville, J.); State of Hawaii v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Civil No. 97-0441-01 (Haw.Cir.Cl.); State of Indiana v. Philip Morris, Inc., No. 49D07-9702-CT-000236 (Ind.Super. Ct.

Ranchers Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stockgrowers of America v. United States Department of Agriculture

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2025

Dep’t of Educ. v. Brown, 600 U.S. 551, 565 (2023) (quoting 5 U.S.C. § 553(e)). R-CALF’s second theory of standing fares no better. … The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Department of Education v. Brown, 600 U.S. 551 (2023), provides significant guidance on this question.

International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Mediation Board

409 F. Supp. 113 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 10, 1976

National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943) and Railway Clerks v. … Non-contract Employees, 380 U.S. 650 , 85 S.Ct. 1192 , 14 L.Ed.2d 133 (1965) as well as the decision rendered by this circuit in International Ass’n of Machinists and Aerospace Workers v.

Hannington v. Weinberger

393 F. Supp. 553 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 1975

Moreover, it misses the point made by Board of Regents v. … Like Brown v. Weinberger, Ryan v. Shea (Civ.

Vhs Acquisition Subsidiary Number 7, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 10, 2024

In Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the Supreme Court faced a fusion of these two exemptions. 561 U.S. 477 (2010). … In Calcutt v.

Vhs Acquisition Subsidiary Number 7, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 22, 2024

That union filed a formal complaint with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”). Id. … Co. v. United States, 272 U.S. 658, 672 (1926).

Weber v. Hurtgen

297 F. Supp. 2d 58 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2003

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999). … Brown, 199 F.3d at 452 .

International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Mediation Board

180 F. Supp. 2d 188 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 14, 2002

International Ass’n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Mediation Bd. (Machinists I), 425 F.2d 527, 537 (D.C.Cir.1970); see also Local 808 v. … The defendants answer in the negative, relying upon Dalton v.

Rustrata v. United States Merit Systems Protection Board

549 F. Supp. 344 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 15, 1982

Pascal v. United States, 211 Ct.Cl. 183 , 543 F.2d 1284 (1976); Dabney v. Freeman, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 166 , 358 F.2d 533 (1965). . … Industries/Federal Sheet Metal, Inc. v.

Montgomery Ward & Co. v. National War Labor Board

55 F. Supp. 371 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 1944

. *372 Now, in the case of the Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. … In the case of Texas & New Orleans Railroad Co. et al. v.