Case law

Olson v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 6, 2010

See Ojo v. … See Taylor v. United States Board of Parole, 194 F.2d 882, 883 (D.C. Cir. 1952).

United States v. Philip Morris Inc.

153 F. Supp. 2d 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2001

(“BAT Ind.”) for lack of personal jurisdiction, United States v. … Supreme Court decision, FDA v.

Leighton v. Central Intelligence Agency

412 F. Supp. 2d 30 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 18, 2006

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002) (internal citations and quotations omitted). … Similarly, in Reinbold v.

Reo Acquisition Group, LLC v. Federal National Mortgage Association

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 20, 2015

Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957) (alteration in original)). … Date: February 20, 2015 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

United States v. Thomas

525 F. Supp. 2d 17 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 2007

Charles Brown, another participant in the conspiracy, was paid by defendant Miller to accept a package of drugs delivered to Brown’s residence. See Trial Tr., 86, Apr. 25, 2006. … accept a parcel of narcotics that was mailed to Brown’s residence.

Furash & Co., Inc. v. McClave

130 F. Supp. 2d 48 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 4, 2001

Carr v. Brown, 395 A.2d 79, 84 (D.C.1978); see Restatement (Second) of Torts § 766B. Furthermore, the defendant’s interference must be improper. … Co. v.

Obregon v. Mukasey

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 9, 2009

See Taylor v. United States Board of Parole, 194 F.2d 882, 883 (D.C. … . § 2255); Ojo v.

Novak v. Capital Management & Development Corp.

241 F.R.D. 389 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 24, 2007

V. … As to the latter contention, Defendants quote nearly three pages from Brown v.

Williams v. District of Columbia

771 F. Supp. 2d 29 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 23, 2011

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Douglass v.

Willner v. Thornburgh

738 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 15, 1990

See Harmon v. Thornburgh, 878 F.2d 484 (D.C.Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 865 , 107 L.Ed.2d 949 (1990); National Federation of Federal Employees v. … .-, 110 S.Ct. 864 , 107 L.Ed.2d 948 (1990); American Federation of Government Employees v.

White v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia · May 15, 2018

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)).

Gilbert v. Napolitano

760 F. Supp. 2d 21 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 12, 2011

See Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446 , 456 n. 10 (D.C.Cir.1999), abrogated on other grounds by Steele v. Schafer, 535 F.3d 689 (D.C.Cir.2008). … Arrington v.

Ranchers Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stockgrowers of America v. United States Department of Agriculture

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2021

The Beef Act and Beef Order created two national entities to administer the program under USDA oversight: the Cattlemen’s Beef Promotion and Research Board (“Beef Board”) and the Beef Promotion Operating Committee (“Operating … In Steel Co. v.

Maydak v. U.S. Department of Justice

579 F. Supp. 2d 105 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2008

See Firestone v. … See Fenster v. Brown, 617 F.2d 740, 743-44 (D.C.Cir.1979) (“The FOIA was fundamentally designed to inform the public and not to benefit private litigants.”); Horsehead Industries, Inc. v. U.S.

Soleymani v. Rubio

District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2026

Arpaio v. Obama, 797 F.3d 11, 19 (D.C. Cir. 2015). A motion under Rule 12(b)(6) “tests the legal sufficiency of a complaint.” Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)).

Allina Health Services v. Burwell

141 F. Supp. 3d 17 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 30, 2015

Factual Overview1 In Allina Health Services v. … v.

Bickford v. Government of the United States of America

808 F. Supp. 2d 175 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 6, 2011

See id. at 1276; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). III. DISCUSSION Ms. … Although the Court is mindful that a pro se complaint “must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers,” Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C.

Organization for Competitive Markets v. Office of Inspector General

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 12, 2024

The Cattlemen’s Beef Promotion & Research Board (“CBB” or “Beef Board”) and the Beef Promotion Operating Committee (“BPOC”) “assist in developing and implementing beef promotion and research projects for the Beef Checkoff … V.

In the Matter of the Yellow Line Cases

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 14, 2017

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)).

Horn v. Huddle

699 F. Supp. 2d 236 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2010

See Horn v. Huddle, 647 F.Supp.2d 55 (D.D.C.2009) (Lamberth, C.J.); Horn v. Huddle, 636 F.Supp.2d 10 (D.D.C.2009) (Lamberth, C.J.). 1 . The question whether to invoke the privilege typically arises in civil litigation. … See United States v. Aref, 533 F.3d 72, 78-80 (2d Cir.2008): hut see United States v. Rosen, 557 F.3d 192, 198 (4th Cir.2009).