Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.90s
District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 3, 2019
(citing Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434–35 (2009); Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Counsel, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 22 (2008); Wis. … DATE: July 3, 2019 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2021
The Beef Act and Beef Order created two national entities to administer the program under USDA oversight: the Cattlemen’s Beef Promotion and Research Board (“Beef Board”) and the Beef Promotion Operating Committee (“Operating … In Steel Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished3e Mobile, LLC v. Global Cellular, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 2019
Brown; 3E was represented by Mr. Tymoczko and Tommy Wang. Id. at 45, 179–80; ECF 80 at 67; ECF 81 at 82. … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished598 F. Supp. 2d 89 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 2009
See, e.g., Woodruff v. Peters, 482 F.3d 521, 525 (D.C.Cir.2007); Strong-Fischer, 554 F.Supp.2d at 23 , Wiley v. Johnson, 436 F.Supp.2d 91, 96 (D.D.C.2006). … Mondy, 845 F.2d at 1057 (quoting Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Edüd 196 (1984)).
Cited 6 timesPublished338 F. Supp. 1025 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 1971
Kleindienst and departmental attorney Edgar Brown. … The case of Washington v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedFrank LLP v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 14, 2017
Mayer Brown LLP v. IRS, 562 F.3d 1190, 1193 (D.C. Cir. 2009). … See ICC v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMusgrove v. District of Columbia Public Schools
District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 7, 2011
Regs. 5-E, § 1401.2(n) (2002), and (ii) “[v]iolation of the rules, regulations, or lawful orders of the Board of Education or any directive of the Superintendent of Schools, issued pursuant to the rules of the Board of … See also, e.g., Brown v. District of Columbia, 251 F. Supp. 2d 152, 165 (D.D.C. 2003) (finding that the plaintiff failed to satisfy § 12-309 when she sent letters to the District’s police chief, D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2022
In 2017, Plaintiffs brought a derivative action in West Virginia state court against certain Board members. Id. ¶ 4. … The Board convened the next day and voted to seek dismissal of Plaintiffs’ claims. Id. ¶ 50.
Cited 0 timesPublished945 F. Supp. 313 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 15, 1996
See Saah v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 433 A.2d 1114, 1117 (D.C.1981) (5% violation of the District’s lot occupancy limitation was insufficient to justify regulatory action). B. … In Saah v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 433 A.2d 1114, 1117 (D.C.1981), a property owner-developer built a building in excess of the District’s lot occupancy limitation by 5%.
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Oct 3, 2023
Hylton-Brown resulted in the collision and Mr. … See United States v. Davis, 863 F.3d at 901; United States v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGezahey v. Greater Washington Oncology associates/american Oncology Network
District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 16, 2023
Ward v. D.C. Dep’t of Youth Rehab. Servs., 768 F. Supp. 2d 117, 119 (D.D.C. 2011). In the case of a pro se plaintiff, it also includes documents produced in “filings responsive to a motion to dismiss.” Brown v. … Na’im v. Rice, 577 F. Supp. 2d 361, 370 (D.D.C. 2008) (citing Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C. Cir. 1985)). C.
Cited 0 timesPublished952 F. Supp. 2d 97 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 2013
Cir. 1999); see also Celotex Corp. v. … Kappos v. Hyatt, 132 S. Ct. 1690, 1700– 01 (2012).
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States v. Philip Morris Inc.
153 F. Supp. 2d 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2001
(“BAT Ind.”) for lack of personal jurisdiction, United States v. … Supreme Court decision, FDA v.
Cited 2 timesPublished27 F. Supp. 682 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 8, 1939
The cases are reviewed in Dvorine v. Castelberg Corp., supra; State ex rel. Attorney General v. Gus Blass Co., 193 Ark. 1159 , 105 S.W.2d 853 , and State v. Gate City Optical Co. et al., 339 Mo. 427 , 97 S.W.2d 89 . … See, also, Georgia Board of Optometry v. Friedman’s Jewelers, 183 Ga. 669 , 189 S.E. 238 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2026
Arpaio v. Obama, 797 F.3d 11, 19 (D.C. Cir. 2015). A motion under Rule 12(b)(6) “tests the legal sufficiency of a complaint.” Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Oct 9, 2009
See Taylor v. United States Board of Parole, 194 F.2d 882, 883 (D.C. … . § 2255); Ojo v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.
316 F. Supp. 2d 19 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 6, 2004
U.S. v. … See Oki Semiconductor Co. v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Oct 13, 2022
Sparrow v. United Air Lines, Inc., 216 F.3d 1111, 1113 (D.C. Cir. 2000). However, a court may not accept inferences that “are unsupported by the facts set out in the complaint.” Browning v. … Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 835 (1976). Therefore, where “the same set of facts supports a Title VII claim and a non-Title VII claim against a federal employer, the Title VII claim preempts the non-Title VII claim.”
Cited 0 timesPublishedRiva v. Attorney General of United States
377 F. Supp. 1286 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 17, 1974
This decision was subsequently affirmed by the Board of Immigration Appeals and by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Riva v. … Foti v. Immigration Serv., 375 U.S. 217, 226 , 84 S.Ct. 306 , 11 L.Ed.2d 281 (1963); Mar-cello v. Attorney General of U. S., D.C. Cir., 1974, 495 F.2d 171 .
Cited 4 timesPublished285 F. Supp. 2d 33 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 1, 2003
See Board of County Comm’rs v. … See Brown, 520 U.S. at 407-08 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 ; Canton, 489 U.S. at 389 , 109 S.Ct. 1197 . Plaintiff has failed to make that showing.
Cited 16 timesPublished
Ask Donna