Case law

Consumers Union of U.S., Inc. v. Federal Reserve Board

736 F. Supp. 337 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 2, 1990

Indus, v. Block, 643 F.Supp. 1256, 1266 (N.D.Cal. 1986); see also Short Haul Survival Comm. v. … The need for deference is all the more compelling where the Board is not only charged with administering the statute, Udall v.

McKinley v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

849 F. Supp. 2d 47 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2012

Brown v. DOJ, 742 F. Supp. 2d 126, 129 (D.D.C. 2010), quoting SafeCard Servs., Inc. v. SEC, 926 F.2d 1197, 1200 (D.C. Cir. 1991) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). … However, it is McKinley’s and not the Board’s burden to establish that predecisional records have been adopted as policy. See, e.g., Mayer, Brown, Rowe and Maw, LLP v. IRS, 537 F.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Smith

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 2, 2024

Reeves v. … Texas v.

BOARD OF SUP'RS OF FAIRFAX CTY., VA. v. McLucas

410 F. Supp. 1052 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 1976

EDF v. Butterfield (DDC, C.A. 74-217). 9 . … See: EDF v. EPA, 158 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 485 F.2d 780 , 783 (1973). 15 . See: Oljato Chapter of the Navajo Tribe v. Train, 169 U.S.App.D.C. 195 , 515 F.2d 654 (1975). 16 .

Murphy v. Livingsocial, Inc.

931 F. Supp. 2d 21 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 2013

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … V. Technomedia Int’l, Inc., 699 F.

Niles v. United States Capitol Police Board

233 F. Supp. 3d 140 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 2017

After a Disciplinary Review Board (“DRB”) hearing in February 2015, Niles was found guilty of these charges. (Id. ¶ 20). … Co. v. F.D.I.C., 642 F.3d 1137, 1139 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (quoting Thomas v. Principi, 394 F.3d 970, 972 (D.C. Cir. 2005)). III. DISCUSSION A.

Ball v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

87 F. Supp. 3d 33 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2015

In Murphy v. … Citizen v.

Firestone v. Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 24, 2017

Civil Action No. 16-1810 (CKK) FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD, et al., Defendants. … (“courts in this Circuit typically require joinder of an absent party where the claims of a party and the absent party to a common fund or asset are conflicting and mutually exclusive”) (citing Brown v.

Nacs v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 2013

) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil Case No. 11-02075 (RJL) ) v. … ) ) BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE ) FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, )

Smith v. Board of Commissioners of District of Columbia

259 F. Supp. 423 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 7, 1966

This principle was established in the leading case of Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447 , 43 S.Ct. 597 , 67 L.Ed. 1078 . … If the agency refuses redress appeal can be taken to the Board of Commissioners.

North Carolina State Board of Elections v. United States

208 F. Supp. 2d 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 2002

Allen v. State Bd. of Elections, 393 U.S. 544, 559 , 89 S.Ct. 817 , 22 L.Ed.2d 1 (1969). As this Court explained in Beer v. … They rely in particular on Busbee v.

Guaranty Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

330 F. Supp. 470 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 2, 1971

See First National Bank of McKeesport v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n of Homestead, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 194 , 225 F.2d 33 (1955); Federal Home Loan Bank Board v. … Federal Home Loan Bank Board v. Rowe, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 140, 144 , 284 F.2d 274, 278 (1960). See also First National Bank of McKeesport v.

Chiron Corp. v. United States National Transportation Safety Board

27 F. Supp. 2d 257 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 2, 1998

In City of Rochester v. … Similarly, in Mace v.

Artis v. Greenspan

223 F. Supp. 2d 149 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 2002

Judge Brown’s order stated that the complainants could not directly appeal to the Commission from her decision. … See, e.g., Brown v. General Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 832 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). Failure to exhaust administrative remedies deprives a district court of subject matter jurisdiction.

Inland Empire District Council v. National Labor Relations Board

62 F. Supp. 207 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 1943

This cause came on for hearing on the complaint seeking injunctive and declaratory relief, and the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order to restrain a proceeding before the National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter … The court being of the opinion that administrative remedies have not been exhausted and that it does not have jurisdiction, under the allegations of the complaint, to enjoin the Board or the members of the Board from conducting

International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Mediation Board

374 F. Supp. 2d 135 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 20, 2005

Board Member’s Inaction on IAM’s Request for Proffer The plaintiff also contends that defendant Board Member Fitzmaurice’s lack of vote on the IAM proffer request “prevents the Board from acting” and is further proof of the … Co. v.

Hodge v. United Airlines

821 F. Supp. 2d 180 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 21, 2011

However, Hodge’s statements about what his union representative told him about Brown are not admissible to prove bias by Brown. See Greer v. Paulson, 505 F.3d 1306, 1315 (D.C.Cir.2007) (“‘Sheer hearsay’ ... … See Horvath v.

Kaempfer v. Brown (In re B & W Management, Inc.)

71 B.R. 987 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 9, 1987

United States v. DeLuna, 763 F.2d 897 (8th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Thomas v. United States, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 382 , 88 L.Ed.2d 336 (1985); United States v. Nelson, 718 F.2d 315 (9th Cir.1983); United States v. … In United States v.

Libertarian Party v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

768 F. Supp. 2d 174 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 2011

See Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 737 n. 8, 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974) (collecting cases). … Timmons v.

United States v. United States Gypsum Co.

67 F. Supp. 397 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 15, 1946

In National Labor Relations Board v. … Brown for Certain-teed.