Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.43s
ENERGOINVEST DD v. Democratic Republic of Congo
355 F. Supp. 2d 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 19, 2004
V(l)-(2); see also Karaha Bodas Co., L.L.C. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Ne gara, 364 F.3d 274 , 287 n. 16 (5th Cir.2004) (setting forth the grounds for refusal or deferral of confirmation). … Id.; see also Ipitrade Int’l, S.A. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 465 F.Supp. 824, 827 (D.D.C.1978).
Cited 1 timesPublishedAir Line Pilots Ass'n, Intern. v. Eastern Air Lines
701 F. Supp. 865 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 1988
Healthy City Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). … As our Circuit recently declared, “[T]he arbitration board’s jurisdiction over minor disputes is exclusive; the courts do not have jurisdiction to issue status quo injunctions.” ALPA v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Jan 19, 2022
matters relating to the academy that [the Board] decides to consider.” … .”); Stanley v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedChelsea Condominium Unit Owners Ass'n v. 1815 a St., Condominium Group, LLC
468 F. Supp. 2d 136 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 3, 2007
Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren, 353 F.3d at 39 ; Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . 2.
Cited 26 timesPublishedYoussef v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
19 F. Supp. 3d 167 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 28, 2014
Although Youssef may believe the Board should have been more impressed with his credentials, the Board was entitled to form its own opinions concerning the relative value of his experiences. See Fischbach v. … Grosdidier v. Broadcasting Board of Governors, 709 F.3d 19, 26 (D.C. Cir. 2013) (“[E]vidence of pretext might include ‘an error too obvious to be unintentional.’” (quoting Fishbach, 86 F.3d at 1183)).
Cited 4 timesPublishedTeran-Sanchez v. Stream Realty Partners
District Court, District of Columbia · May 26, 2026
Ho v. Garland, 106 F.4th 47, 50 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (quotation marks omitted) (quoting Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015)). … See Plesha v. Ferguson, 725 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Dover, New Hampshire v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
36 F. Supp. 3d 103 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 14, 2014
See Allen v. … See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 570 (1972) (“[T]he range of interests protected by procedural due process is not infinite.”).
Cited 6 timesPublishedBangor & Aroostock Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen
296 F. Supp. 1220 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 1969
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.. Co., 382 U.S. 423 , 86 S.Ct. 594 , 15 L.Ed.2d 501 . . Bangor & Aroostock R. Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Engineers, 253 F.Supp. 682 . . … Co. v. Brotherhood of R. Rd. Trainmen, 250 F.Supp. 691 ; 128 U.S.App.D.C. 59 , 385 F.2d 581 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedPublic Citizen, Inc. v. Department of Health & Human Services
151 F. Supp. 2d 64 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 9, 2001
FDA v. Brown & Williamson, 529 U.S. 120, 121 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000). … Cross Mot. at 24 (citing Russello v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedRgi Events & Public Relations, LLC v. Al Qurm Management Consultancy
District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 2019
Johnson–Brown v. 2200 M Street LLC, 257 F. Supp. 2d 175, 177 (D.D.C. 2003) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)). … Fund v. Hormel Foods Corp., 249 F. Supp. 3d 53, 56 (D.D.C. 2017) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Johnson–Brown, 257 F. Supp. 2d at 177). III.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Apr 18, 2023
Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). … See Bush v. Butler, 521 F. Supp. 2d 63, 71 (D.D.C. 2007) (citing Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished511 F. Supp. 2d 188 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2007
Houlahan v. World Wide Ass’n of Specialty Programs and Schools, 2006 WL 2844190 , at *1 (D.D.C. Sept. 29, 2006) (citing Bennett Enters., Inc. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 45 F.3d 493 , 499 (D.C.Cir.1995)); see also Brown v. … Carr v. Brown, 395 A.2d 79, 84 (D.D.C.1978). Ridgewells, unfortunately, has demonstrated neither here.
Cited 5 timesPublishedEstate of Carolyn Mickens v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2021
See Fontaine v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 42 F. Supp. 3d 102, 107 (D.D.C. 2014) (explaining that courts may dismiss a complaint sua sponte for failure to comply with Rule 8); Brown v. Wash. Metro. … DATE: August 5, 2021 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States Circuit Judge
Cited 0 timesPublishedElectronic Privacy Information Center v. U.S. Department of Education
48 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 5, 2014
EPIC has a fourteen-member Board of Directors and an Advisory Board with over fifty members. Id. ¶ 14. … The members of the Board of Directors manage the organization and participate in the selection of the Advisory Board. Id. ¶ 15.
Cited 16 timesPublishedD&S Consulting, Inc. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 21, 2018
In Marra v. Papandreou, the D.C. … The Court notes that if it could reach the issue, the Court would find that the Board would meet the adequacy standard.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLeji v. Department of Homeland Security
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 2015
Neitzke v. Williams, 490 US. 319, 325 (1989); see Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330-31 (DC. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The complaint’s lengthy and often confusing factual allegations do not meet this standard. For the foregoing reasons, this action will be dismissed.
Cited 0 timesPublished84 F. Supp. 3d 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2015
Defendant asserts that imposition of a term of supervised release constitutes “multiple punishments for the same offense” in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause.3 See Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 (1977). … Ohio v. Johnson, 467 U.S. 493, 499 (1984).
Cited 14 timesPublishedHickman v. United States of America
District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 29, 2019
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2022
See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. … In these circumstances, then, § 2241 rather than § 2255 applies because § 2255 is “inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of [one’s] detention.” 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e); Brown v. Sec’y of the U.S. Army, 859 F.
Cited 0 timesPublished516 F. Supp. 2d 76 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 2007
See Brown, 407 F.Supp.2d at 68 (citing Coleman-Adebayo v. … Brown v. Snow, 407 F.Supp.2d 61 , 67 n. 5 (D.D.C. 2005); Lester v. Natsios, 290 F.Supp.2d 11 , 23 n. 2 (D.D.C.2003) (citing 29 U.S.C. § 791 (g)); see also Bragdon v.
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna