Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

5.43s

  • ENERGOINVEST DD v. Democratic Republic of Congo

    355 F. Supp. 2d 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 19, 2004

    V(l)-(2); see also Karaha Bodas Co., L.L.C. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Ne gara, 364 F.3d 274 , 287 n. 16 (5th Cir.2004) (setting forth the grounds for refusal or deferral of confirmation). … Id.; see also Ipitrade Int’l, S.A. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 465 F.Supp. 824, 827 (D.D.C.1978).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Air Line Pilots Ass'n, Intern. v. Eastern Air Lines

    701 F. Supp. 865 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 1988

    Healthy City Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). … As our Circuit recently declared, “[T]he arbitration board’s jurisdiction over minor disputes is exclusive; the courts do not have jurisdiction to issue status quo injunctions.” ALPA v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Severino v. Biden

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 19, 2022

    matters relating to the academy that [the Board] decides to consider.” … .”); Stanley v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chelsea Condominium Unit Owners Ass'n v. 1815 a St., Condominium Group, LLC

    468 F. Supp. 2d 136 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 3, 2007

    Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren, 353 F.3d at 39 ; Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . 2.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Youssef v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

    19 F. Supp. 3d 167 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 28, 2014

    Although Youssef may believe the Board should have been more impressed with his credentials, the Board was entitled to form its own opinions concerning the relative value of his experiences. See Fischbach v. … Grosdidier v. Broadcasting Board of Governors, 709 F.3d 19, 26 (D.C. Cir. 2013) (“[E]vidence of pretext might include ‘an error too obvious to be unintentional.’” (quoting Fishbach, 86 F.3d at 1183)).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Teran-Sanchez v. Stream Realty Partners

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 26, 2026

    Ho v. Garland, 106 F.4th 47, 50 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (quotation marks omitted) (quoting Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015)). … See Plesha v. Ferguson, 725 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Dover, New Hampshire v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

    36 F. Supp. 3d 103 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 14, 2014

    See Allen v. … See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 570 (1972) (“[T]he range of interests protected by procedural due process is not infinite.”).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Bangor & Aroostock Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen

    296 F. Supp. 1220 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 1969

    Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.. Co., 382 U.S. 423 , 86 S.Ct. 594 , 15 L.Ed.2d 501 . . Bangor & Aroostock R. Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Engineers, 253 F.Supp. 682 . . … Co. v. Brotherhood of R. Rd. Trainmen, 250 F.Supp. 691 ; 128 U.S.App.D.C. 59 , 385 F.2d 581 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Public Citizen, Inc. v. Department of Health & Human Services

    151 F. Supp. 2d 64 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 9, 2001

    FDA v. Brown & Williamson, 529 U.S. 120, 121 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000). … Cross Mot. at 24 (citing Russello v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Rgi Events & Public Relations, LLC v. Al Qurm Management Consultancy

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 2019

    Johnson–Brown v. 2200 M Street LLC, 257 F. Supp. 2d 175, 177 (D.D.C. 2003) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)). … Fund v. Hormel Foods Corp., 249 F. Supp. 3d 53, 56 (D.D.C. 2017) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Johnson–Brown, 257 F. Supp. 2d at 177). III.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lee v. U.S. Federal Goverment

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 18, 2023

    Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). … See Bush v. Butler, 521 F. Supp. 2d 63, 71 (D.D.C. 2007) (citing Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Siegel v. Ridgewells, Inc.

    511 F. Supp. 2d 188 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2007

    Houlahan v. World Wide Ass’n of Specialty Programs and Schools, 2006 WL 2844190 , at *1 (D.D.C. Sept. 29, 2006) (citing Bennett Enters., Inc. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 45 F.3d 493 , 499 (D.C.Cir.1995)); see also Brown v. … Carr v. Brown, 395 A.2d 79, 84 (D.D.C.1978). Ridgewells, unfortunately, has demonstrated neither here.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Estate of Carolyn Mickens v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2021

    See Fontaine v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 42 F. Supp. 3d 102, 107 (D.D.C. 2014) (explaining that courts may dismiss a complaint sua sponte for failure to comply with Rule 8); Brown v. Wash. Metro. … DATE: August 5, 2021 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States Circuit Judge

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Electronic Privacy Information Center v. U.S. Department of Education

    48 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 5, 2014

    EPIC has a fourteen-member Board of Directors and an Advisory Board with over fifty members. Id. ¶ 14. … The members of the Board of Directors manage the organization and participate in the selection of the Advisory Board. Id. ¶ 15.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • D&S Consulting, Inc. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 21, 2018

    In Marra v. Papandreou, the D.C. … The Court notes that if it could reach the issue, the Court would find that the Board would meet the adequacy standard.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Leji v. Department of Homeland Security

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 2015

    Neitzke v. Williams, 490 US. 319, 325 (1989); see Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330-31 (DC. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The complaint’s lengthy and often confusing factual allegations do not meet this standard. For the foregoing reasons, this action will be dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Lee

    84 F. Supp. 3d 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2015

    Defendant asserts that imposition of a term of supervised release constitutes “multiple punishments for the same offense” in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause.3 See Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 (1977). … Ohio v. Johnson, 467 U.S. 493, 499 (1984).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Hickman v. United States of America

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 29, 2019

    P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dillon v. McCarthy

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2022

    See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. … In these circumstances, then, § 2241 rather than § 2255 applies because § 2255 is “inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of [one’s] detention.” 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e); Brown v. Sec’y of the U.S. Army, 859 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Spelke v. Gonzales

    516 F. Supp. 2d 76 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 2007

    See Brown, 407 F.Supp.2d at 68 (citing Coleman-Adebayo v. … Brown v. Snow, 407 F.Supp.2d 61 , 67 n. 5 (D.D.C. 2005); Lester v. Natsios, 290 F.Supp.2d 11 , 23 n. 2 (D.D.C.2003) (citing 29 U.S.C. § 791 (g)); see also Bragdon v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.