Case law

Scollick v. Narula

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 2022

CSG was established as a SDVOSB in 2010. Pl.’s Facts {| 42. … The question a court must ask is whether the contract provision in question “clearly reflects such a purpose.” Jd.

Thompson v. Hicaps Incorporated

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 19, 2022

Under this framework, the plaintiff must first establish a prima facie case of discrimination. … “To establish a prima facie case of tortious interference and survive summary judgment, [Mr.

J.J. v. Government of the District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 2011

provide that an educational entity is required to involve a student’s parent at an initial eligibility meeting: Upon completion of the administration of assessments and other evaluation measures[, a] group of qualified … In addition, at least three of the invitations sent to the plaintiffs’ attorney contained in the administrative record clearly demonstrated DCPS’ attempts to schedule an eligibility meeting.

Rector v. Walmart Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 4, 2025

Walmart alleges that Plaintiffs qualify as members in the Kahn litigation, and because Plaintiffs are already putative members of those classes, they are not prejudiced by a stay. … Supp. 2d at 62 (transferring a second-filed case to another forum where most witnesses resided because the motions “clearly identif[ied] the purpose and relevance of each witness’s testimony”).

Johnson v. Georgetown University

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2026

explain how Georgetown “violated” its own policy by taking action that was clearly contemplated by the quoted provision, id. … These same allegations served as the “linchpin” of Johnson’s earlier defamation claim and otherwise clearly sound in that tort. Id.

United States v. Leake

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 2020

next to impossible to conclude that that common area qualifies as curtilage that gives rise to protectible privacy interests. … See Dunn, 480 U.S. at 301 (establishing that one factor of curtilage determination is “the nature and uses to which the area is put”).

Association of Administrative Law Judges, Inc. v. Heckler

594 F. Supp. 1132 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 10, 1984

Berkley, has been in existence since SSA was established. … In sum, the ALT’S right to decisional independence is qualified.

Shapiro v. U.S. Department of Justice

37 F. Supp. 3d 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2014

Shapiro does not dispute that the Hardy Declaration establishes that Mr. … refers to particular types of matters,’” 50 U.S.C. § 552(b)(3), and thus, “qualifies as a withholding statute under Exemption 3”); Valfells v.

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Weinberger

367 F. Supp. 1378 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 11, 1973

Defendants have interposed what has now become a standard litany of defenses: no justiciable case or controversy, sovereign immunity, unconsented suit for money damages, executive discretion, historical precedent and statutory … I Title V of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 established a program of federal grants to strengthen state departments of education.

Greenberg v. Colvin

63 F. Supp. 3d 37 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 8, 2014

Thus, even if an otherwise qualified resident of Israel has never been employed or collected earnings, s/he may satisfy the criteria and be entitled to NII Old Age Benefits. … Predominance “In order to meet the predominance requirement of Rule 23(b)(3), a plaintiff must establish that the issues in the class action that are subject to generalized proof, thus applicable to the class

Rahman v. Johanns

501 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 7, 2007

He alleges that he applied for the positions, that he was highly qualified but was “not even considered,” and that other less qualified candidates were granted consideration. Compl. at 12. … Thus, there clearly would be substantial injury to other interested parties.

Knowledgeplex, Inc. v. Metonymy, Inc.

574 F. Supp. 2d 164 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 5, 2008

Subsection (b) qualifies the reach of the statute by noting that “[w]hen jurisdiction over a person is based solely upon this section, only a claim for relief arising from acts enumerated in this section may be asserted against … Second, the subcontract in that case “stat[ed] clearly that ‘Subcontractor shall be bound by all the terms of the [Prime] Contract ... and all such terms, obligations and provisions of the [Prime] Contract are hereby inserted

United States v. Exxon Corp.

561 F. Supp. 816 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 1983

File concluded, was inconsistent with the regulations’ purpose and therefore was “clearly not within [their] intent.” Id. Mr. … Indeed, when the agency intended such a discriminatory result, it stated its aim clearly.

Ficken v. Powell

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2011

More specifically, the plaintiff claims that the Oral Assessment portion of the Foreign Service Exam (“the Oral Assessment”), which the defendant uses to identify qualified candidates to serve as Foreign Service Officers … Supp. 2d 51, 62-63 (D.D.C. 2008) (“Although Plaintiff clearly values his own credentials and experiences, a plaintiff’s subjective assessment of his own record is largely irrelevant.”); Spelke v. Gonzales, 516 F.

Tune v. Walter Reed Army Medical Hospital

602 F. Supp. 1452 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 1985

The rule has never been qualified in its application by either the nature or purpose of the treatment, or the gravity of the consequences of acceding to or foregoing it. … Recognition of such an interest, however, does not necessarily resolve the problem where the affliction or disease clearly indicates that the life will soon, and inevitably, be extinguished.

Electronic Privacy Information Center v. United States Department of Homeland Security

117 F. Supp. 3d 46 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 4, 2015

However, in this case, the Holzer declaration clearly asserts personal knowledge that "Sherman serves as a TOP SECRET classification authority." Second Holzer Deel. <JI 55. … Companies that merely receive information but do not provide any information would not qualify for protection under Exemption 7(D).

Toledano Ex Rel. Estate of deToledano v. O'Connor

501 F. Supp. 2d 127 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 17, 2007

Most of plaintiffs’ challenges to the arbitration agreement clearly fall within the first category of claims that can be heard by the district court. … The provision simply does not qualify as unconscionable under California law. D. Is the Arbitration Provision Prohibitively Costly?

Andrade Romero v. Rbs Construction Corporation, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 22, 2022

Moreover, Federal Rule of Evidence 604 requires that “[a]n interpreter must be qualified and must give an oath or affirmation to make a true translation.” Jack v. … Plaintiffs have therefore shown she is qualified and have submitted her affirmation of translation. See Trans World Airlines, 854 F.Supp. at 659 n.4.

GTE New Media Services, Inc. v. Ameritech Corp.

21 F. Supp. 2d 27 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 1998

The court notes the existence of evidence tending to establish the two other section 13-423(a)(4) qualifiers, i.e., regularly does or solicits business or derives substantial revenue from the district. … The court makes no findings as to these qualifiers, however, because of the court's persistent course of conduct analysis.

National Urban League v. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia · May 2, 2025

establishing jurisdiction.” … But Plaintiffs do not clearly describe what those applications look like.