Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

1.36s

  • Mahoney v. United States Capitol Police Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 17, 2024

    To begin, the Board’s ban on expressive activities on the eastern steps is troublingly overinclusive. See Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of N.Y. … See Brown v. Ent. Merchs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Keith v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

    284 F. Supp. 2d 31 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2003

    (citing Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976); Bayer v. United States Dept. of the Treasury, 956 F.2d 330, 332 (D.C.Cir.1992)); Cristwell v. … Individuals “who fail[] to comply, to the letter, with administrative deadlines ‘ordinarily will be denied a judicial audience.’ ” Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C.Cir.1985) (quoting Shehadeh v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • American Air Transport, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    98 F. Supp. 660 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 29, 1951

    operations after June 20, 1949, unless by that date the carrier filed with the Board an application for exemption. … There is nothing in the ruling of Judge Holtzoff in the case of Arrow; Airways, Inc., v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Civil Action No. 4502-50, 1 which is at variance with the Court’s ruling in this case.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    346 F. Supp. 751 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 10, 1972

    Tennessean Newspapers, Inc. v. F.H.A., 464 F.2d 657 (6th Cir., 1972); Getman v. N. L. R. B., 450 F.2d 670, 672 (D.C.Cir. 1971). … American Mail Line, Ltd. v. Gulick, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 382 , 411 F.2d 696, 703 (1968).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Mediation Board

    194 F. Supp. 3d 106 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 2016

    See Ark Initiative v. Tidwell, 816 F.3d 119, 126-27 (D.C. … See, e.g., Edelstein v. City & Cty. of San Francisco, 56 P.3d 1029, 1041 (Cal. 2002) (citing Burdick v. Takushi, 504 U.S. 428, 438 (1992)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Porterfield v. Army Review Board Agency

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 6, 2019

    See Brown v. Mattis, No. 16-cv-1025, 2018 WL 6433754, at *5 (D.D.C. Dec. 7, 2018), appeal docketed sub nom. Brown v. Shanahan, No. 18- 5382 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 31, 2018). … See, e.g., Voinche v. Obama, 744 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Giri v. National Board of Medical Examiners

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 23, 2024

    Sys. v. … See id. at 663–64 (distinguishing Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Patsel v. District of Columbia Board of Education

    530 F. Supp. 660 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 21, 1982

    Campbell v. Talladega County Board of Education, 518 F.Supp. 47 (N.D.Ala.1981); Tatro v. Texas, 516 F.Supp. 968 (N.D.Tex.1981); Pratt v. Board of Education of Frederick County, 501 F.Supp. 232 (D.Md.1980). … Foster v. District of Columbia Board of Education, 523 F.Supp. 1142, 1144 (D.D.C. 1981); Davis v. District of Columbia Board of Education, 522 F.Supp. 1102, 1105 (D.D.C.1981). 3 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Stanazai v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 5, 2019

    P. 8(a); see also Brown v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 164 F. Supp. 3d 33, 35 (D.D.C. 2016) (complaint fails Rule 8(a) where it does not allege “any facts that could plausibly support a claim for relief”). … Mitchell v. Baldrige, 759 F.2d 80, 86 (D.C. 1985) (quoting Mckenna v. Weinberger, 729 F.2d 783, 790 (D.C. Cir. 1983)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carson v. United States Merit Systems Protection Board

    534 F. Supp. 2d 96 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 2008

    Pro se petitioner Joseph Carson brings this lawsuit against the United States Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB” or the “Board”) seeking a writ of mandamus “directing] MSPB to conduct the necessary reviews of [the Office … See Fornaro v. James, 416 F.3d 63, 67 (D.C.Cir.2005) (CSRA is comprehensive and exclusive remedial scheme); Carducci v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Thate v. District of Columbia Armory Board

    804 F. Supp. 373 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 15, 1992

    Armory Board (“Armory Board”). 3. … Stadium, Stewart v. D.C. Armory Board, 789 F.Supp. 402 (D.C.Cir.1992). 7.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Colts v. U.S. Parole Commission

    531 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 9, 2008

    Nov.8, 1996) (per curiam) (Parole Board properly relied on criminal charge of which appellant had been acquitted); Arias v. … Board of Parole, 759 A.2d 1073, 1075 (D.C.2000) (“Even though the murder charge against Barnes was dropped, it was permissible for the Board [of Parole] to consider, as it did, the facts underlying that charge.”).

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Hickman v. Federal Reserve Board of Governors

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2010

    P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Oralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, sues the Federal Reserve.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Key Airlines, Inc. v. National Mediation Board

    743 F. Supp. 34 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 1990

    IAM v. TWA, 839 F.2d 809 , 811 (D.C.Cir.1988). In Switchmen’s Union v. … IAM v. TWA, 839 F.2d 809 , 810-12 (D.C.Cir.1988); Aeronautical Radio v. National Mediation Bd., 380 F.2d 624 , 626 (D.C.Cir.1967). See also, Zantop Int’l Airlines, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Blackmon-Malloy v. United States Capitol Police Board

    338 F. Supp. 2d 97 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2004

    Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 453 (D.C.Cir.1999). … Capitol Police Board, Civ. No. 02-1859; Fields v. U.S. Capitol Police Board, Civ. No. 02-1346; Ross v. U.S. Capitol Police Board, Civ. No. 02-2481; Fields v. U.S. Capitol Police Board, Civ.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Ricks v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 27, 2021

    She has filed suit against the United States Railroad Retirement Board (“RRB”), including the RRB Hearings & Appeals Office, and the “whole railroad retirement board systemically.” See id. at 2. … Rockefeller v. Westinghouse Elec. Co., 274 F. Supp. 2d 10, 16 (D.D.C. 2003) (same), affd sub nom. Rockefeller ex rel. U.S. v. Washington TRU Solutions LLC, No. 03-7120, 2004 WL 180264 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 21, 2004).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McMillan v. District of Columbia Board of Elections

    75 F. Supp. 3d 348 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 9, 2014

    v. 1:14-cv-00939 (BAH) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF Judge Beryl A. … In that case, the plaintiff challenged New York State and New York City Boards of election for removing “the word ‘Damn’ from the [plaintiff’s] party’s name.” McMillan v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Nelson v. Board of Pardons and Paroles

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 30, 2010

    ) ) Civil Action No. 10 233~J Board … Because a federal district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to review the decisions of another federal district court, see 28 U.S.c. §§ 1331, 1332 (general jurisdictional provisions); Fleming v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Western Presbyterian Church v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

    862 F. Supp. 538 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 8, 1994

    See Western Presbyterian Church v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 849 F.Supp. 77 (D.D.C.1994). … In Sherbert v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Board of Directors v. Resolution Trust Corp.

    173 B.R. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 14, 1994

    Chestnut I, 161 B.R. at 862 (citing Steyr-Daimler-Puch of America Corp. v. Pappas, 852 F.2d 132, 135-36 (4th Cir.1988)). … Teltronics Services, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.