The opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEC 30 2010
Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy
Ardell Nelson, Jr., ) Courts for the District of Columbia
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
)
Civil Action No.
10 233~J
Board of Pardons and Parole et al.,;
)
)
Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In this action brought pro se, plaintiff, a Texas state prisoner, seeks review of a report and
recommendation issued by a magistrate judge in the United States District Court for the Western
District of Texas. Because a federal district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to review the
decisions of another federal district court, see 28 U.S.c. §§ 1331, 1332 (general jurisdictional
provisions); Fleming v. United States, 847 F. Supp. 170, 172 (D.D.C. 1994), cert. denied 513
U.S. 1150 (1995), dismissal is required. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). A separate Order accompanies
this Memorandum Opinion.
,J
Date: December 2'3,2010 United States District Judge
rJ 3