Case law

Williams v. Colvin

134 F. Supp. 3d 358 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2015

Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d 703, 705 (D.C. Cir. 1986) (quoting Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971)). … Jackson v. Barnhart, 271 F. Supp. 2d 30, 33 (D.D.C. 2002); see also Coffman v.

Grynberg v. BP PLC

585 F. Supp. 2d 50 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 12, 2008

Brown v. Dorsey & *53 Whitney, LLP, 267 F.Supp.2d 61, 67 (D.D.C.2003) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Par-Knit Mills, Inc. v. Stockbridge Fabrics Co., 636 F.2d 51 , 54 & n. 9 (3d Cir.1980). … See, e.g., Contec Corp. v.

In Re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation - Mdl 1869

District Court, District of Columbia · May 20, 2016

United States v. Brown, 415 F.3d 1257, 1269 (11th Cir. 2005); see also Jacobsen v. Oliver, No. 01-1810, 2007 WL 5527513, at *1 (D.D.C. Nov. 2, 2007); F.T.C. v. … Honda Motor Co. v. Allen, 600 F.3d 813, 815 (7th Cir. 2010))).

La Réunion Aérienne v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya

477 F. Supp. 2d 131 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2007

On September 19, 1989, Union des Transports Aériens (“UTA”) Flight 772 exploded in mid-air over Niger, Africa, killing all 170 people on board. … Co. v. Brown, 321 F.Supp. 309, 312 (N.D.Ga.1971) (same); see also Blue Cross and Blue Shield of N.J., Inc. v.

United States v. Parker

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 2026

Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742 (1983) (citation modified). The Chandler police lawfully retained Parker’s car key and gold phone after his arrest. … Brown, 460 U.S. at 742.

Savage v. United States Department of Justice

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 2022

Brown v. Morgan, 209 F.3d 595, 596 (6th Cir. 2000); Harris v. Hegmann, 198 F.3d 153, 158 (5th Cir. 1999). … Ross, 578 U.S. at 644; Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 935 n.10 (9th Cir. 2005).

Douglas v. Hampton

338 F. Supp. 18 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 17, 1972

Griggs v. … See Holden v. Finch, 446 F.2d 1311 (D. C.Cir. 1971).

Union Trust Co. of District of Columbia v. United States

113 F. Supp. 80 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 1953

See: Jackson v. State of New York, 1933, 261 N.Y. 134 , 184 N.E. 735 ; Bloom v. Jewish Board of Guardians, 1941, 286 N.Y. 349 , 36 N.E.2d 617 ; Foley v. … State of New York, 1945, 294 N.Y. 275 , 62 N.E.2d 69 , citing Jackson v. State of New York and Bloom v. Jewish Board of Guardians, supra. Moch Co. v.

Rocky Mountain Health Maintenance Organization, Inc. v. Cochran

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 2018

of a reviewable Board decision or action.” … is notified of the Board’s decision, reverses, affirms, or modifies the Board’s decision.” 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(f)(1).

United States v. Thomas

574 F. Supp. 197 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 28, 1983

The Supreme Court established in Baldwin v. … Grimaud, 220 U.S. 506 , 31 S.Ct. 480 , 55 L.Ed. 563 (1911); see also United States v. Brown, 552 F.2d 817 , 823 n. 8 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 949 , 97 S.Ct. 2666 , 53 L.Ed.2d 266 (1977).

Sharp v. Dolan

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 2018

S(a); see Ashcrofl v. ]qbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … v, Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Irvin v. Sharief

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 2017

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must comply with the F ederal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tz`sch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. l987j. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Mathews

410 F. Supp. 336 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 1976

Calvert Cliffs Coordinating Committee v. Atomic Energy Commission, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 33 , 449 F.2d 1109 , 1112 (1971). … As the Court of Appeals noted in Calvert Cliffs, What possible purpose could there be in requiring the “detailed statement” to be before hearing boards, if the boards are free to ignore entirely the contents of the statement

Woodson v. Smith

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 14, 2021

Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1023 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (cleaned up). A complaint “need not plead law or match facts to every element of a legal theory,” Krieger v. Fadely, 211 F.3d 134, 136 (D.C. … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Woodson’s discrimination claim survives Edgewood’s Motion to Dismiss. C.

Labofish v. Berman

55 F.2d 1022 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 18, 1932

Code 1929, tit. 20, § 991), it validated the ordinances of the Board of Health of the District of Columbia, and by Act August 7, 1894, 28 Stat. 257 (D. C. … See Hamer v. Globe Co., 243 Ill. App. 109, 117 ; Hennessy v. Metropolitan Co., 74 Conn. 699 ) 52 A. 490 ; McKinstry v. Collins, 74 Vt. 147 , 52 A. 438 ; State v.

Flowers v. Washington Federal Savings Bank (In Re Flowers)

94 B.R. 3 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 3, 1988

Co. v. Silverman, 454 F.2d at 913 n. 29; Thompson v. Mazo, 245 A.2d 122 (D.C.1968). … Absent extraordinary circumstances, cause would exist to permit the granting of a deed. 3 In re Brown, 75 B.R. at 1012 ; In re Wallace, 31 B.R. at 65-67 .

Ruther v. Tipsurd

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 24, 2017

P. 8(a); see Ashcr()ji v. ]q})al, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Cl`ralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 66l, 668-7l (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Cali/ano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D,C. 1977). w memm§a»,m» ~W z t Plaintiff resides in l\/Ianassas, Virginia.

In Re Federal Election Campaign Act Litigation

474 F. Supp. 1051 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 7, 1979

WALTHER v. STEWART et al. WALTHER v. TUCKER et al. WALTHER v. HASKELL et al. WALTHER v. CLARK et al. WALTHER v. ROY et al. WALTHER v. HUDDLESTON et al. WALTHER v. HATHAWAY et al. WALTHER v. BROOKE et al. WALTHER v. … Like Brown v.

Matthews v. Hesburgh

504 F. Supp. 108 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 1980

Plaintiff relies on Board of Regents v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S. at 577, 92 S.Ct. at 2709 (emphasis supplied).

Cunningham v. Eeoc

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2024

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (rule 12(b)(6) case); Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Vilsack, 808 F.3d 905, 913 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (rule 12(b)(1) case). … See id.; 16 F.3d at 1276; see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).