Opinion

Sharp v. Dolan

Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Jul 30, 2018
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge Rudolph Contreras
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 4.9%

The opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT jU\_ 3 0 2018

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , l ` *

clerk u.b L)is!rlct & Bankruptcy

Cnurts for the Dlstrict of Columbia

DARYL SHARP, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v ) Civil Action No.: l:lS-cv-Ol4ll (UNA)

)

_ l

Tll\/IOTHY DOLAN, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of the Plaintiff` s pro se Complaint

(“Compl.”) and Application for Leave to Proceed in_ forma pauperis (“IFP”). The Court will grant

the Plaintiff" s Application for Leave to Proceed lFP and dismiss the case because the Complaint

fails to meet the minimal pleading requirements of Rule S(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

Pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tz`sch,

656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires

complaints to contain "(l) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction

[and] (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.”

Fed. R. Civ. P. S(a); see Ashcrofl v. ]qbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d

661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair notice of

the claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate defense and

determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies Brown v, Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498

(D.D.C. 1977).

The Plaintiff brings an action against the Archbishop of New York, Cardinal Timothy

Dolan, consisting of a set of wide-ranging grievances against the Catholic Church. Compl. at 3-6.

The Plaintiff alleges that Catholic bishops are ". . . stealing from people, businesses [,] and the

United States government,” id. at 2, and are engaged in efforts to manipulate individuals “in this

country and around the globe . , ." [a’. at 4. Further, the Plaintiff alleges that the Catholic Church

is responsible for various “terror attacks.” Ia’. ln addition to “5()() trillion dollars” in damages, the

Plaintiff prays that this Court assist in the mass conviction and incarceration of Catholic bishops.

Id. at l, 7.

The Complaint, as pled, fails to provide any notice ofa claim or any basis of federal court

jurisdiction Therefore, this case will be dismissed A separate Order accompanies this

l\/lemorandum Opinion.

//;2% 469

Date: July 97 ,20l8 Unite States DistrictJudge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.