Case law

Medina v. Dc Government

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 18, 2010

A Our main concerns was that no matter how qualified a Latino or Hispanic officer was, when it came time that they apply for positions, rarely were they selected. … The last page sets forth a table of statistics, and I think this leads clearly to speculation from the jury as to what these numbers mean, and on that basis it should not come

Bannum, Inc. v. Citizens for a Safe Ward Five, Inc.

383 F. Supp. 2d 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 10, 2005

Clearly, Bannum is voluntarily involved in a controversy that has an impact upon an appreciable segment of the public. … Plaintiff has failed to establish intentional interference inducing or causing a breach or termination of the expectancy.

Libertarian Party v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

768 F. Supp. 2d 174 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 2011

Barr ran as a qualified write-in candidate in the District of Columbia. Id. ¶ 8. Plaintiffs J. … Since the Court has already concluded that the regulation’s burden is slight, the District does not need to establish a compelling interest to justify the rule.

University of Kansas Hospital Authority v. Sebelius

953 F. Supp. 2d 180 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 15, 2013

The Medicare Program Title XVIII of the Social Security Act established the federally funded health insurance program for the elderly and disabled, commonly known as “Medicare.” 42 U.S.C. § 1395 et seq. … The Program Memorandum clearly and repeatedly emphasizes that all State-only days (e.g. MediKan days) “do not count in the Medicare [DSH adjustment] calculation” and payment based on such days was an error.

Darryl Lamont DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant

970 F. Supp. 2d 10 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 19, 2013

provided that such statute either “(A) [requires withholding] in such a manner as to leave no discretion on the issue,” or “(B) establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to particular types of matters to … Any information that “applies to a particular individual” qualifies for consideration under this exemption. U.S. Dep’t of State v. Wash. Post Co., 456 U.S. 595, 602 (1982); accord New York Times Co. v.

Castanon v. United States of America

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2020

UOCAVA requires States (as well as U.S. territories and the District of Columbia) to permit otherwise-qualified voters residing or stationed overseas to vote in the last place they were domiciled prior to leaving the United … Id. at 25 (“Plaintiffs . . . cannot successfully establish that the Constitution itself is unconstitutional.”).

Fortson v. Harvey

407 F. Supp. 2d 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 15, 2005

The defen *16 dants accurately observe, however, that the Army’s guidelines for these investigations establish advisory rather than binding procedures for conducting administrative investigations. Defs. Reply, p. 7. … Exemption 6 permits the government to withhold “personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” 5 U.S.C. § 552 (b)(6).

Kennedy v. Dynamic-Pro, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 2023

The plaintiff must first establish the prima facie case of retaliation. Id. at 1320 n.*. As the D.C. … Even if Kennedy could establish each of the incidents at trial, no reasonable jury could find that they established a hostile work environment.

American Center for Law and Justice v. United States Department of Justice

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 19, 2018

Here, Defendant’s declarant has not established that the email in question—labeled FBI-12—was “compiled for law enforcement purposes.” … In that sense, they qualify as predecisional. Finally, Plaintiff’s segregation argument bears no fruit.

Hartman v. Duffy

158 F.R.D. 525 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 23, 1994

The Court of Appeals clearly stated that the first question before this Court should be whether the certification back in 1978 was proper. Hartman, 19 F.3d at 1474 . … After having been found qualified and placed on the register, she called the Agency regularly to check on her status. Id. at ¶ 9.

Samma v. U.S. Department of Defense

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 2020

The Manual stated that “‘[o]ne day of qualifying service [wa]s sufficient in establishing eligibility.’”33 Nio II, 385 F. Supp. 3d at 50 (quoting USCIS Policy Manual, Vol. 12, Part I, Ch. 3, § A); (see also Pls.’ … While the Court’s review may be circumscribed, the APA clearly requires more of an agency.

Samra v. Shaheen Business & Investment Group, Inc.

355 F. Supp. 2d 483 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 2005

Clearly, Samra has not established these three elements by a preponderance of the evidence. … Oruche, 257 F.Supp.2d 230 , 239 n. 7 (holding that, under District of Columbia choice of law rules, the immunity agreement should be governed by D.C. contract law because it was "drafted and executed” in D.C., not simply

Curwen v. District of Columbia International School

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 15, 2025

Ultimately, DCI may establish that Mr. … He also again asked for leave pursuant to the FMLA, and given the rambling nature of his email, was clearly still experiencing mental health issues.”

United States v. Okafor

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 23, 2024

Okafor’s alleged conduct was clearly proscribed. … 5 not clearly proscribed.

Payne v. Barnhart

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2010

To qualify for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Act, a claimant must establish that he is “disabled.” 42 U.S.C. §§ 423(a)(1)(D), 1382(a)(1). … The government clearly failed to demonstrate good cause for their final, out-of-time motion to 10 enlarge time, and their motion is DENIED.

Donohoe v. Bonneville International Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2009

against him because of his age by improperly including him in the Reduction in Force (“RIF”) conducted in Bonneville’s Washington, D.C. office, and by subsequently selecting Matt Spacciapoli, a younger, allegedly less-qualified … It appears that the magistrate judge accepted Bonneville’s contentions and Donohoe has not established that accepting these arguments was clearly erroneous.

Hall v. Department of Homeland Security

219 F. Supp. 3d 112 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 2016

He also later filed a motion seeking to establish jurisdiction, but did not explain why vacatur of the dismissal would be appropriate, despite this Court’s direction to do so. … To qualify as unreasonable and vexatious behavior, there must be “evidence of recklessness, bad faith, or improper motive” present in the attorney’s conduct. LaPrade v.

Palmer v. Shultz

616 F. Supp. 1540 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 1985

Plaintiffs’ expert established no basis for his comparison of actual awards with expected awards. No showing was made by plaintiffs’ expert of what portion of female FSO’s were qualified for the Superior Honor Award. … The expert’s analysis was based on a faulty assumption that all female FSO’s were equally qualified for the Superior Honor Award. 51.

Hutchins v. Dyncorp International, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2018

None of these allegations is sufficient to establish plausible liability under the False Claims Act. … Plaintiff-Relators’ allegations regarding the immunization program fail for similar reasons.

Castanon v. United States of America

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2020

UOCAVA requires States (as well as U.S. territories and the District of Columbia) to permit otherwise-qualified voters residing or stationed overseas to vote in the last place they were domiciled prior to leaving the United … Id. at 25 (“Plaintiffs . . . cannot successfully establish that the Constitution itself is unconstitutional.”).