Case law

Alder v. Columbia Historical Society

690 F. Supp. 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 17, 1988

In December 1983, acting on defendant Fisher’s recommendation, the Society’s Board adopted a resolution to terminate Mrs. … In Brown v. Capitol Hill Club, 425 A.2d 1309 (D.C.1981), the D.C. Court of Appeals interpreted the D.C.

Nader v. Ray

363 F. Supp. 946 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 1973

See, e.g., School Board of City of Newport News v. Atkins, 246 F.2d 325 (4th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 855 , 78 S.Ct. 83 , 2 L.Ed.2d 63 . … Crowther v. Seaborg, supra.

Renoir v. Governor of Virginia

755 F. Supp. 2d 82 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 3, 2010

Renoir v. Davidson, No. 08-cv-333, 2008 WL 2944893 , at *1 (E.D.Wisc. July 25, 2008) (noting accumulation of three “strikes”); Renoir v. Brown, No. 07-cv-166, 2007 WL 1052477 , at *1 (W.D.Va. … District of Columbia, 463 F.3d 3, 6 (D.C.Cir.2006) (quoting Brown v. Johnson, *85 387 F.3d 1344, 1350 (11th Cir.2004)). Mr.

Selvin Leonardy Solis Meza v. Cissna

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 7, 2020

by Immigration Judges to Board of Immigration Appeals). … Kucana v.

Harley v. Lehman

981 F. Supp. 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 14, 1997

Plaintiff also appeals the final action of the PTO’s Board of Appeals on the merits of his patent application. … See, e.g., Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. American Federation of Railroad Police, Inc.

613 F. Supp. 602 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 1985

The procedures to be followed require the parties to attempt settlement; failing in this, the dispute must be referred to the appropriate adjustment board or special board of adjustment (Public Law Board). 45 U.S.C. § 153 … That adjustment board has exclusive jurisdiction to resolve the minor dispute; district courts may not adjudicate the merits of such issues. Local 553, Transport Workers v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 695 F.2d at 675 .

Coia v. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION

570 F. Supp. 2d 12 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 6, 2008

See Brown v.

Magassa v. Transportation Security Administration

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 20, 2025

Larson v. Dep’t of State, 565 F.3d 857, 862 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (quoting Miller v. Casey, 730 F.2d 773, 776 (D.C. Cir. 1984)). … Magassa] would reveal whether he was or was not on a watch list utilized by TSA for passenger pre-board screening.” Esteves Decl. ¶ 17.

Hajjar-Nejad v. George Washington University

873 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 4, 2012

Wopsock v. … See Dave v.

Contreras v. Commissioner of Social Security

239 F. Supp. 3d 203 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2017

Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d 703, 708 (D.C. Cir. 1986). … Charles v.

United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

327 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2004

See Local R. 7.1(b); United States v. … V.

Hisgen v. Fanning

208 F. Supp. 3d 186 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 20, 2016

She has brought suit to overturn a decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (Board) confirming that she violated the Military Whistleblower Protection Act by reprising against a service member who made … With respect to military correction board decisions, Congress authorized the Secretary of the Army to act through a civilian board whenever it is “necessary to correct an error or remove an injustice” from an Army record

Easaw v. Newport

253 F. Supp. 3d 22 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 2017

Chappell-Johnson v. Powell, 440 F.3d 484, 488 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)); see also Czekalski v. Peters, 475 F.3d 360, 364 (D.C. Cir. 2007); George v. … Abebio v. G4S Gov't Sols., Inc., 72 F. Supp. 3d 254, 257 (D.D.C. 2014) (quoting Miles v. Univ. of D.C., Civil No. 12–378 (RBW), 2013 WL 5817657, at *13 (D.D.C. Oct. 30, 2013) (quoting Brown v.

United States v. Williams

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2025

See Brown v. Amtrak Corp., No. 03-7003, 2003 WL 22433755, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 27, 2023) (“A dismissal ‘with prejudice’ is a final judgment on the merits which bars further litigation between the same parties.” … See also Thorp v. District of Columbia, 142 F. Supp. 3d 132, 145 (D.D.C. 2015) (noting that dismissal with prejudice “reflect[s] on the merits of the underlying action” (quoting Brown v.

Jones v. District of Columbia

241 F. Supp. 3d 81 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 15, 2017

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 538 (1985) (citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576–578 (1972)).

Bowles v. National Ass'n of Home Builders

224 F.R.D. 246 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2004

On September 9, 2002, over plaintiffs continuing objection, the NAHBRC’s Board of Directors (“the Board”) approved the License Agreement. … Fund v.

Cole v. United States Department of Justice

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 18, 2021

See Brown v. Jewell, 134 F. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

PHOENIX ASSUR. CO. OF NY v. Potomac Sand & Gravel Co.

343 F. Supp. 658 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 17, 1972

Baumann v. Maloney Concrete Company, 278 F.Supp. 463, 464 (D.D. C.1967). … See Brightheart v. McKoy, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 400 , 420 F.2d 242, n. 4 (1969).

Shell Development Co. v. Pure Oil Co.

111 F. Supp. 197 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 1953

The Board of Interference Examiners of the Patent Office in its decision and the parties -have recognized that the terms “mercaptans” and “mercaptides” are used interchangeably in the interference count. 7 . Abbott v. … Smith v. Kingsland, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 284 , 178 F.2d 26 . 38 . Montgomery v. Marzall, 88 U.S.App. D.C. 281, 189 F.2d 640 ; Smith v. Kingsland, supra.

Smith v. U.S. Department of Agriculture

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 2023

See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). … See McNeil v. United States, 508 U.S. 106, 113 (1993); Smith v. Clinton, 886 F.3d 122, 127 (D.C. Cir. 2018).