Case law

American Postal Workers Union v. United States Postal Service

595 F. Supp. 1352 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 1984

Plaintiff argues that the standards enunciated in Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968) govern. … See Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 571-73 , 88 S.Ct. at 1736-37 (1968); Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138 , 103 S.Ct. 1684, 1687 , 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983). .

Laureys v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 2019

Liberally construed, the complaint also alleges that Directors Booth and Brown of the Department of Corrections acted alongside the Warden and that the Warden and Directors Booth and Brown are actors who “may by their … See Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1020–21 (D.C. Cir. 2014).

Office & Professional Employees International Union, Local 2 v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

552 F. Supp. 622 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 15, 1982

Instead of empaneling such a board, the parties voluntarily submitted the dispute to a board of five arbitrators. … California Pacific Bank v.

Smartmatic USA Corp. v. Powell

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 9, 2026

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 499 (D.D.C. 1977). And “[e]nforcing th[is] rule[] is largely a matter for the trial court’s discretion.” Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 669 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown, 75 F.R.D. at 498.

Nitterright v. Claytor

454 F. Supp. 130 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 23, 1978

Laffey v. … In Addison v.

Trazell v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 29, 2020

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. 1 Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). It also assists the court in determining whether it has jurisdiction over the subject matter.

Yeager v. National Public Radio

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 10, 2021

Lewis (NPR attorney), John Lansing (“CEO of NPR”), Paul Haaga (former “NPR Board Chairman"), and finally, Christopher Turpin (NPR’s “Vice [P]resident of News”). … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Sidy Ba v. Legavox

District Court, District of Columbia · May 24, 2024

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). “[A] confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.” Cheeks v. Fort Myer Constr. Corp., 71 F.

O'Diah v. Roberts

District Court, District of Columbia · May 22, 2023

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).  As drafted, Plaintiff’s pro se complaint fails to comply with the minimal pleading standard set forth in Rule 8(a).

Stewart v. Musk

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 11, 2026

Ho v. Garland, 106 F.4th 47, 50 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (quotation marks omitted) 3 (quoting Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. … And central to the CSRA’s framework is “the primacy” of the Merit System Protection Board (“MSPB”) “for administrative resolution of disputes over adverse personnel action, . . . and the primacy of the United States Court

Gaither v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 8, 2009

See Pl.’s Opp’n, Ex. 11 (Deposition Excerpt of Marvin Brown). … (quoting D.C. v. Brown, 589 A.2d 384, 388, n. 6 (D.C. 1991)).

Hines v. Powell

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 27, 2009

Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d at 14. The consultation deadline allows an employer to investigate promptly before evidence becomes stale. See, e.g., Delaware State Coll. v. … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999); see Smith v. Dist. of Columbia, 430 F.3d 450, 455 (D.C. Cir. 2005).

Pailes v. United States Peace Corps

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 10, 2013

Drake v. FAA, 291 F.3d 59, 66 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (emphasis in original) (citing l \t\\ Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 94 (1980)); see I.A.M Nat’l Pension Fund v. Indus. Gear Mfg. Co., 723 F.2d 944, 949 (D.C. … Cir. 20l0) (citing Arizona v. California, 530 U.S. 392, 412-13 (2000); Brown v. D,C., 514 F.3d l279, 1285-86 (D.C.

Williams v. Office of Personnel Management

983 F. Supp. 2d 153 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 17, 2013

Plaintiff, a resident of Norfolk, Virgina, sues the Offlce of Personnel Management ("OPM") and the Merit Systems Protection Board ("MSPB"). … Forrzaro v. James, 416 F.3d 63, 66 (D.C. Cir. 2005).

Selvin Leonardy Solis Meza v. Cissna

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 7, 2020

by Immigration Judges to Board of Immigration Appeals). … Kucana v.

Diamond v. McKenzie

602 F. Supp. 632 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 1985

The hearing officer correctly concluded that those requirements are not contained in the Rules of the District of Columbia Board of Education Board Rules. … V Two additional issues must be addressed.

Konah v. District of Columbia

815 F. Supp. 2d 61 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 14, 2011

Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Compare Redd, 232 F.3d at 937-38 (applying a test put forth in NLRB v. Browning-Ferris Indus. of Pa., Inc., 691 F.2d 1117, 1123 (3d Cir. 1982)), with Spirides v. Reinhardt, 613 F.2d 826, 831 (D.C.

Singh v. Aarp

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 17, 2020

See Browning-Ferris Indus. of Cal. v. NLRB, 911 F.3d 1195, 1201 (D.C. Cir. 2018) (citing NLRB v. Browning-Ferris Indus., Inc., 691 F.2d 1117 (3d Cir. 1982)). … Whether the employer retained the power to fire the plaintiff is only one factor to consider under the Browning-Ferris test for joint employers. See Nytes v. Trustify, Inc., 297 F. Supp. 3d 191, 204 (D.D.C. 2018).

Maye v. Reno

231 F. Supp. 2d 332 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 19, 2002

In Siegert v. … See Bush v. Lucas, 462 U.S. 367, 375-76 , 103 S.Ct. 2404 , 76 L.Ed.2d 648 (1983); Spagnola v. Mathis, 859 F.2d 223, 228-29 (D.C.Cir.1988); see also Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976).

United States v. Warner

84 F. Supp. 607 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 2, 1949

Brown v. United States, D.C., 72 F.Supp. 153 , affirmed 3 Cir., 164 F.2d 490 . It is believed that the best expression of the Maryland law is found in the court’s opinion in Schaffer v. … In that opinion the court cited Wenning v.