Case law

Murphy v. Brockenborough

District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2026

Cir. 2010) (courts “may raise the res judicata preclusion defense sua sponte”) (citing Brown v. Dist. of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1285–86 (D.C. Cir. 2008)) (other citation omitted). … See Lewandowski v. Prop. Clerk, 209 F. Supp. 2d 19, 22 (D.D.C. 2002) (citing Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. Adkins, 310 U.S. 381, 402–03 (1940)); Wilson v. Fullwood, 772 F. Supp. 2d 246, 261 (D.D.C. 2011). v.

Weisbrod v. Lynn

383 F. Supp. 933 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 11, 1974

On March 11, 1974, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, relying on the intervening Supreme Court decision of Cleveland Board of Education v. … Cleveland Board of Education, supra, 414 U.S. 632 , 94 S.Ct. at 806 . 9 . Port Authority, supra, 387 F.2d at 263, n. 3.

United States v. Darui

545 F. Supp. 2d 108 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 18, 2008

See United States v. … As to the next two topics related to the Center’s Board of Directors, defendant asserts that the significance of the legitimacy of the Center’s Board is dependent on certain facts to be proved. (Id.)

Chambers v. Office of the Attorney General

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 12, 2024

Cir. 2022), ECF No. 67-1, but the en banc court reversed this Court’s dismissal of the plaintiff’s discrimination claim and a Circuit panel’s affirmance of the dismissal, concluding that its ruling in Brown v. … Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 285 F.R.D. at 136; see, e.g., Johnson v.

Scott v. District of Columbia

598 F. Supp. 2d 30 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 2009

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). “[A] complaint needs some information about the circumstances giving rise to the claims.” Aktieselskabet AF 21. Nov. 2001 v. … Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . The accuracy of Captain Scott’s time entries is not a matter of public concern.

Terry v. United States Parole Commission

741 F. Supp. 282 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 1990

See also Strait v. Laird, 406 U.S. 341 , 92 S.Ct. 1693 , 32 L.Ed.2d 141 (1972); Schlanger v. Seamans, 401 U.S. 487 , 91 S.Ct. 995 , 28 L.Ed.2d 251 (1972). … Guerra v. Meese, 786 F.2d 414, 416 (D.C.Cir.1986).

Hickman v. Freedom Liberty Independence Party

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 23, 2009

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519,520 (1972). Nonetheless, pro se plaintiffs must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Uniboard Aktiebolag v. Acer America Corp.

118 F. Supp. 2d 19 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 31, 2000

In Amsted Industries Inc. v. … See Lans v. Gatetvay 2000, Inc., 84 F.Supp.2d 112 (D.D.C.1999). As the Court noted, although Lans might be the managing director and sole shareholder of Uni-board, Lans and Uniboard are two distinct legal entities.

Ervin v. Howard University

445 F. Supp. 2d 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 23, 2006

(citing Cruger v. … See Johnson v. Greater Se. Cmty. Hosp.

Ruther v. Democratic National Committee

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 30, 2019

S(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678~79 (2009). … Brown v. Cazifano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.c. 1977). The current allegations, basis for jurisdiction, and entitlement to relief, if contained Within plaintiff’ s complaint, are completely unclear to the Court.

Borum v. Brentwood Village, LLC

218 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 21, 2016

Reiner v. California, 612 F. App’x 473 (9th Cir. 2015)). In Reiner, the plaintiff sought review of determinations made in a state-level workers’ compensation appeal board and “state tribunals.” … United Food & Commercial Workers Union 26 Local 751 v. Brown Grp., Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 553 (1996) (quoting Hunt v. Wash. State Apple Advert.

Rossi v. Attorney General

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 15, 2021

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Watson v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 13, 2009

Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330 (D.C. Cir. 1994) (quoting Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327 n.6 (1989)). … See Brown v. Dist. Unemployment Comp. Bd., 411 F. Supp. 1001, 1001-02 (D.D.C. 1975) (noting that a district court has the power to dismiss a case sua sponte if it is frivolous).

McDade v. Morton

353 F. Supp. 1006 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 6, 1973

Udall v. Tallman, supra; Schraier v. Hickel, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 81, 83-85 , 419 F.2d 663, 665-667 (1969); Duesing v. Udall, supra; Haley v. Seaton, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 257, 260-261 , 281 F.2d 620, 623-624 (1960). … National Labor Relations Board v. Baltimore Transit Co., 140 F.2d 51, 55 (C.A. 4, 1944), cert. denied, 321 U.S. 795 , 64 S.Ct. 848 , 88 L.Ed. 1084 .

Jicarilla Apache Nation v. United States Department of the Interior

648 F. Supp. 2d 140 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 31, 2009

Merit appealed this decision to the Interior Board of Land Appeals (“IBLA”), which reversed the ALJ on the jurisdictional question and remanded the case for further proceedings. … See, e.g., Browning v.

Grenadier v. Boasberg

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 2014

P. 8(a); see Ashcroji v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Savoy v. VMT LONG TERM CARE MANAGEMENT CO., INC.

522 F. Supp. 2d 211 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 2007

See Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 148 n. 1, 104 *213 S.Ct. 1723, 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984); Smith-Haynie v. District of Columbia, 155 F.3d 575 , 578 n. 3 (D.C.Cir.1998). … See Griffin v. Acacia Life Ins. Co., 925 A.2d 564, 576-77 (D.C.2007). Second, it should be noted that plaintiff cannot sue an individual employee under Title VII. Gary v.

Bernard v. United States Department of Defense

362 F. Supp. 2d 272 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2005

If the AARA declines to amend the record, the requester is informed of his right to seek further review from the Department of the Army Privacy Review Board (APRB). Id. … Oglesby v. United States Dep’t of Army, 920 F.2d 57, 61-62 (D.C.Cir.1990); Spannaus v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 824 F.2d 52, 58 (D.C.Cir.1987); Dettmann v.

Folkins v. Watson

129 F. Supp. 362 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 20, 1954

The language of the court in Bostiteh, Inc., v. … Morgan v. Daniels, 1894, 153 U.S. 120 , 14 S.Ct. 772 , 38 L.Ed. 657 ; Abbott v. Coe, 1939, 71 App.D.C. 195 , 109 F.2d 449 .

Nichols v. Vilsack

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 30, 2015

Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C. Cir. 1985). … Bowden, 106 F.3d at 437; see also Brown, 777 F.2d at 13; Dick v. Holder, 80 F. Supp. 3d 103, 111 (D.D.C. 2015); Koch v. Schapiro, 699 F. Supp. 2d 3, 12 (D.D.C. 2010).