Case law

Dorns v. Geithner

692 F. Supp. 2d 119 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2010

Stewart v. Evans, 275 F.3d 1126, 1135 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citing Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 ). … Brown, 199 F.3d at 458 .

Calhoun v. Lehman

556 F. Supp. 67 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 29, 1982

Reed v. Allen, 286 U.S. 191, 198-99 , 52 S.Ct. 532, 533 , 76 L.Ed. 1054 (1947). This Court’s Order of January 27, 1982, did not direct the Naval Board for Correction of Military Records to reconsider Mr. … Calhoun may again seek relief from the Naval Board.

Amin-Bey v. U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons Central Office

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 17, 2014

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 US. 662, 678—79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (DC. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff is a prisoner at the Federal Medical Center in Ayer, Massachusetts.

Turner v. Dallas County

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 2022

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Air Transport Association of America, Inc. v. Export-Import Bank of the United States

878 F. Supp. 2d 42 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 2012

See Hunt v. Washington State Apple Adver. Comm’n, 432 U.S. 333, 343 (1977); United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 552-55 (1996). … Warth v.

Lafayette-South Side Bank v. Commissioner

33 F.2d 646 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 1929

Baker & Taylor Co. v. United States (C. C. A.) 26 F.(2d) 187 . Furthermore, it would have been unlawful for the new bank to issue stock in payment of the good will of the old banks. … Baker & Taylor Co. v. United States (D. C.) 21 F.(2d) 787 , 789. The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed, with costs.

Regan v. Grill Concepts-D.C., Inc.

338 F. Supp. 2d 131 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 5, 2004

Hicks, 509 U.S. at 507-08 , 113 S.Ct. 2742 ; Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d at 458 . III. ANALYSIS A. … See Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446 (D.C.Cir.1999) citing Doe v. Dekalb County School Dist., 145 F.3d 1441 (11th Cir.1998).

Chew v. Quesada

182 F. Supp. 231 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 14, 1960

The only authority cited to sustain the plaintiff’s position is Railroad Retirement Board v. … However, its author, Justice Stone, was to say of Lowden: “[I]t serve[s] both as a footnote and a headstone for the earlier case [Railroad Retirement Board v. Alton Railroad Co.]”

Johnson v. Hughes

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 24, 2019

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The complaint is incoherent and utterly fails to articulate a cognizable claim.

Alton & Southern Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks

481 F. Supp. 130 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 1978

such board and for thirty days after such board has made its report to the President, no change, except by agreement, shall be made by the parties to the controversy in the conditions out of which the dispute arose. … See also United States v. Florida East Coast Ry. Co., 221 F.Supp. 325 (D.D.C.1963).

United Space Alliance, LLC v. Solis

824 F. Supp. 2d 68 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 14, 2011

ANALYSIS This case concerns the validity of a final order issued by the Administrative Review Board of the Department of Labor. … Brown, 540 F.2d 1048, 1055 (10th Cir. 1976) (same).

Nails v. England

311 F. Supp. 2d 116 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2004

Jones v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 205 F.3d 428, 433 (D.C.Cir.2000); Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 453 (D.C.Cir.1999). … V.

Fitzgerald v. Hampton

545 F. Supp. 53 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 15, 1982

Ernest Fitzgerald, CSC Board of Appeals & Review, April 28, 1974. Fitzgerald filed an action in 1974, seeking review of the CSC’s determination. Fitzgerald v. Civil Service Commission, C.A. NO. 74-686 (D.D.C. … School Board, 53 F.R.D. 28 (E.D.Va.1971), rev’d on other grounds, 472 F.2d 318 (4th Cir. 1972), vacated on other grounds, 416 U.S. 696 , 94 S.Ct. 2006 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974); Gates v.

Johnson v. Reilly

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 26, 2010

He claims that the USPC applied its own guidelines issued in 2000 when it should have applied guidelines issued by the former District of Columbia Parole Board in 1987 in conjunction with the Board’s 1991 policy guideline … See Franklin v. District of Columbia, 163 F.3d 625, 632 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (acknowledging new law transferring parole authority from the former D.C. Board of Parole); Sellmon v. Reilly, 551 F.

Carter, Fullerton & Hayes, Lcc v. Federal Trade Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2009

Nat’l Labor Relations Board v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 224 (1978). … New Motor Vehicle Dealer Board of Cal. v. Orrin W. Fox Co., 439 U.S. 96, 111 (1978).

Garcia v. Winter

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 13, 2010

While this appeal was pending, the Supreme Court in March 2006 issued its decision in Georgia v. … Therefore, all of your arguments concerning the court-martial conviction were disregarded by the Board.

Adena Regional Medical Center v. Leavitt

524 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 2007

Procedural History The Hospitals timely filed appeals of the fiscal intermediary’s determination to the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (the “Board”). See 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(a). … See Cabell Huntington Hosp., Inc. v. Shalala, 101 F.3d 984 , 988 (4th Cir.1996); Legacy .Emanuel Hosp. and Health Ctr. v. Shalala, 97 F.3d 1261, 1266 (9th Cir.1996); Deaconess Health Servs. Corp. v.

Electro-Nucleonics, Inc. v. Mossinghoff

592 F. Supp. 608 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 30, 1984

In Graham v. … Corning Glass Works v. Brenner, Comr. Pats., 470 F.2d 410 , 175 USPQ 516 (D.C.Cir.1972). While the question of obviousness, is ultimately a matter of law, it is based on factual findings. In Stieg v.

Able v. State of South Carolina

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2022

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LYVONNE ABLE, Plaintiff, v. … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Pro se litigants like Able are entitled to liberal construction of their pleadings, see Haines v.

National Hospice & Palliative Care Organization, Inc. v. Weems

587 F. Supp. 2d 184 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 24, 2008

See Heckler v. … The Medicare regulations recognize a distinction between the Board’s authority to decide an issue and the Board’s jurisdiction over a claim. See Cape Cod Hosp. v.