Case law

Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2010

Civil Action No. 10-534 (CKK) BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS, et al., Defendants. … Plaintiff’s Work History at BBG The Broadcasting Board of Governors is a federal agency responsible for the U.S. Government’s international broadcasting. See Grosdidier v.

Dunlap v. Department Review Board Appeal Branch

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 2014

Dunlap, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. "' ) Department Review Board et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiff, a California state prisoner, has submitted a hodgepodge of documents containing … See Dunlap v. Board of Prz'son Hearings, No. l:08-cv- l770, 2009 WL 1759651, at *3 (E.D. Cal.

Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2010

Civil Action No. 10-534 (CKK) BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS, et al., Defendants. … See Sataki v. Falahati, Civ. Act.

Live365, Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 23, 2010

Co. v. EPA, 360 F.3d 188, 190-91 (D.C. … Mem. at 20 (quoting Edmond v.

National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1622 v. Brown

481 F. Supp. 704 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 1979

For further discussion of these retroactive pay provisions see American Fed’n of Gov't Employees v. Brown, 481 F.Supp. 711, 718-19 (D.D.C. 1979). . … See American Fed’n of Gov’t Employees v. Brown, 481 F.Supp. 711 , 716 n. 6 (D.D.C. 1979).

Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP v. Internal Revenue Service

537 F. Supp. 2d 128 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 14, 2008

This is a FOIA 1 case concerning three requests for documents submitted to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) by Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP (“Mayer Brown”), a law firm. … Specifically, Mayor Brown asserts that “Ms.

Creed v. National Transportation Safety Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 2010

Chiron v. NTSB, 27 F. … See Aerosource, Inc. v.

Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 22, 2010

Civil Action No. 10-00534 (CKK) BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS, et al., Defendants. … Fox v. Am.

Caul v. United States Capitol Police Board

District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 2016

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Wiley v. Glassman, 511 F.3d 151, 155 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)).

Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2010

Factual Background The Broadcasting Board of Governors is a federal agency responsible for the U.S. Government’s international broadcasting. See Grosdidier v. Chairman, BBG, 560 F.3d 495, 496 (D.C. Cir. 2009). … Brown v. General Serv. Admin, 425 U.S. 820, 821 (1976); see also Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 542 (D.C.

Brown v. State Capitol Office of the Governor

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 2009

District and FOR THE DISTRICT 0F COLUMBIA B°"k"\-'PTCY Courts Jerome Julius Brown , ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) _ v. ) civil Accion No. 1408 ) State Capitol Office of the Governor ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION The … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). As drafted, the Complaint fails to comply with Rule 8(a).

Mahoney v. United States Capitol Police Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 16, 2024

Loving v. IRS, 920 F. Supp. 2d 108, 110 (D.D.C. 2013) (quoting Citizens for Resp. & Ethics in Wash. v. Off. of Admin., 593 F. Supp. 2d 156, 160 (D.D.C. 2009)); see also Wash. Metro. Area Transit Comm’n v. … See Lair v.

Merit Systems Protection Board v. Eastwood

516 F. Supp. 1297 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 1981

See Golden v. Zwickler, 394 U.S. 103, 108-10 , 89 S.Ct. 956, 959-960 , 22 L.Ed.2d 113 (1969); Merced Rosa v. Herrero, 423 F.2d 591, 593 (1st Cir. 1970); Mailer v. Zolotow, 380 F.Supp. 894, 896-97 (S.D.N.Y.1974); C. … See Golden v. Zwickler, 394 U.S. at 109 , 89 S.Ct. at 960 ; International Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union, Local 37 v.

Blanco v. National Labor Relations Board

641 F. Supp. 415 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 1986

See generally NLRB v. A.J. … Squillacote v.

Stewart v. District of Columbia Armory Board

789 F. Supp. 402 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 1992

Board of Airport Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569, 576 , 107 S.Ct. 2568, 2573 , 96 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987). … Stewart v. District of Columbia Armory Board, 863 F.2d 1013, 1017-18 (D.C.Cir.1988) (quoting City of Los Angeles v. Preferred Communications, 476 U.S. 488, 494 , 106 S.Ct. 2034, 2037 , 90 L.Ed.2d 480 (1986)).

Madison v. Cruz

390 F. Supp. 3d 191 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 25, 2019

Copithorne v. … Payton v. Abbott Labs , 386 Mass. 540 , 557, 437 N.E.2d 171 (1982). Defendant points to Schofield v.

Achagzai v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 29, 2020

Before the Court could resolve the Board’s motion, on October 20, 2015, two of the Plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction to prohibit the Board from making certain changes to their work schedules. … Cir. 1993), although, as a general practice, “[r]elief under Rule 60(b)[] motions is rare,” Hall v. CIA, 437 F.3d 94, 99 (D.C. Cir. 2006); see also Kramer v. Gates, 481 F.3d 788, 790 (D.C. Cir. 2007).

Pacific Maritime Association v. National Labor Relations Board

905 F. Supp. 2d 55 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 2012

(the “Board”) against the IBEW. … LC v. Lichtenstein, 441 F.

Porter v. United States Capitol Police Board

816 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 20, 2011

Civil Action No. 10-992 (JEB) UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD, Defendant. … Capitol Police Board, alleging that the merger unlawfully stripped them of their police powers on account of their age.

Boston & Maine Corp. v. National Mediation Board

669 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 14, 1987

The situations in which a district court ought to order the National Mediation Board to appoint a mediator are admittedly few. 1 See International Ass’n of Mach. & *2 A. Wkrs. v. National Med. … and Hudson R.R. v.