Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

0.64s

  • Peterson v. Transport Workers Union of America, Afl-Cio

    75 F. Supp. 3d 131 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 2014

    See Vaca v. … McConnell v. Fed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Association of Letter Carriers v. Blount

    305 F. Supp. 546 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 30, 1969

    National Student Ass'n v. Hershey, D.C.Cir., 412 F.2d 1103, 1111 (1969); Wolff v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16, 372 F.2d 817 (2nd Cir. 1967); see also, Dombrowski v. … See, e. g., United States v. Robel, 389 U.S. 258 , 88 S.Ct. 419 , 19 L.Ed.2d 508 (1967); Keyishian v. Board of Regents, etc., 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); Stewart v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Loumiet v. United States of America

    225 F. Supp. 3d 79 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 22, 2016

    Aug. 7, 2014) (denying discovery request where defendants had asserted qualified immunity defenses in their motions to dismiss); Brown v. Fogle, 819 F. Supp. 2d 23, 29 (D.D.C. 2011) (quoting Pearson v. … Brown, 819 F. Supp. 2d at 29 (quoting Pearson, 555 U.S. at 231–32).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Thorpe v. District of Columbia

    916 F. Supp. 2d 65 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 9, 2013

    Del Monte Fresh Produce Co. v. United States, 570 F.3d 316, 321 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (quoting United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 566 F.3d 1095, 1135 (D.C. Cir. 2009)); see also Amer. Bar Ass’n v. … See, e.g., Olson v. Brown, 594 F.3d 577, 582 (7th Cir. 2010), cert. denied, 130 S.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • United States v. Neill

    952 F. Supp. 834 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 17, 1997

    Agent Brown, who was present when Fort discovered and sealed the document, 9 corroborated Fort’s testimony. See Transcript at 84-85 (Vol. II-B). … Under Weatherford v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Leal v. Securities and Exchange Commission

    District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 23, 2009

    See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Nonetheless, pro se plaintiffs must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Treppel v. Reason

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 27, 2011

    ."); Setco Enterprises Corp. v. … See Hartley v. Dombrowski, 744 F. Supp. 2d 328, 340 (D.D.C. 2010) (citing Medlantic Long Term Care Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Summerfield

    128 F. Supp. 266 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 28, 1955

    Aeronautics Board to fix a temporary rate of compensation. … Then it is urged that because the appropriations committee required quarterly reports, that those indicate notice, as was the case of Brooks v. Dewar, 313 U.S. 354 , 61 S.Ct. 979 , 85 L.Ed. 1399 .

    Reversed in part by Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Summerfield, 229 F.2d 777 (1955)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Richardson v. District of Columbia

    711 F. Supp. 2d 115 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2010

    After Richardson’s suspension in Florida, the District of Columbia Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) recommended that Richardson face reciprocal discipline in the District of Columbia, and the D.C. … See, e.g., Thomas v. Knight, 257 F.Supp.2d 86, 94 (D.D.C.2003). The Rule provides immunity to Members of the Board and Bar Counsel on its face, but similarly, as the D.C.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Mosley v. Bank of America, N.A.

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 17, 2021

    See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. … Brown v. Dist. of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lynch v. Daro Realty LLC

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 2020

    Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Perkins v. United States

    234 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 22, 2002

    Brown approached Perkins’ car and asked her if she was “all right.” Perkins responded that she was injured. 12. … Craine v. United States, 722 F.2d 1523 (11th Cir.1984); Rodriguez v. United States, 455 F.2d 940 (1st Cir.1972); United States v. Hull, 195 F.2d 64, 66 (1st Cir.1952); Western Nat'l Mutual Ins. Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Millennium Square Residential Association v. 2200 M Street LLC

    952 F. Supp. 2d 234 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 10, 2013

    of Directors or the Board’s Executive Committee (“Individual Defendants”). … See Maib v. FDIC, 771 F.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • State National Bank of Big Spring v. Geithner

    197 F. Supp. 3d 177 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 12, 2016

    The Supreme Court subsequently found in National Labor Relations 2 Board v. Noel Canning, 134 S. … Sys., 796 F.3d at 118-19 (Copyright Royalty Board determination ratified 13 by a Board made up of entirely new members).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Harris v. Kijakazi

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 11, 2023

    Genuine Parts Co. v. EPA, 890 F.3d 304, 312 (D.C. Cir. 2018); see also Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d 703, 709 (D.C. … See Brown, 794 F.2d at 708; Lane-Rauth, 437 F. Supp. 2d at 65.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Faternal Order of Police Library of Congress Labor Committee v. the Library of Congress

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 3, 2009

    Billington in his official capacity as Librarian of Congress (“Librarian”), the United States Capitol Police (“USCP”), and the United States Capitol Police Board (“Board”). … See WMATC v. Holiday Tours, 559 F.2d 841, 843 (D.C. Cir. 1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ayash v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 17, 2022

    Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 4 2002) (Rule 12(b)(6)); Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Vilsack, 808 F.3d 905, 913 (D.C. … (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 3625)); see also Brown v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 602 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Traczyk v. Levitan

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 5, 2021

    See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Winfield v. Town of Andover

    305 F. Supp. 3d 286 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 4, 2018

    In particular, the Winfields allege that the "Andover Town Manager and the Chair of the Board of Selectmen have hindered [Ms. Winfield's] participation in the public Town meeting," and that a police officer seized Ms. … Haley , 657 F.3d at 51 (quoting Board of Cty. Comm'rs v. Brown , 520 U.S. 397 , 403, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) ).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Perry v. Snowbarger

    590 F. Supp. 2d 90 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 11, 2008

    See Brady v. … Wiley, 569 F.2d 140, 141 (D.C.Cir.1977) (per curiam) (quoting Brown v. Gen. Serv. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 835 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976)). See also Cross v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.