Case law

United States v. Hinckley

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 13, 2012

Perry v. New Hampshire, No. 10-8974, slip op. at 10-14. … See United States v. Brown, 471 F.3d 802, 805 (7th Cir. 2006); State v. Payne, 199 P.3d 123, 136-38 (Idaho 2008). Counsel for Mr.

Buie v. Berrien

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 1, 2013

See Smith v. Polter, 400 F. … ."); EEOC v. AIC Sec. Investz'gations, Lld., 55 F.3d 1276, 1279 (7th Cir. 1995) ("[l]ndividuals who do not independently meet the ADA’S definition of ‘employer’ cannot be held liable under the ADA."); Brown v.

Muwekma Ohlone Tribe v. Norton

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2011

v. … Board of Education of Topeka, 349 U.S. 294 (1955). Thus, Mancari can have no sway on the Court’s analysis of the Department’s position concerning earlier BIA boarding school attendance.

Rasul v. Rumsfeld

433 F. Supp. 2d 58 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 8, 2006

Herbert v. Nat’l Acad. of Scis., 974 F.2d 192, 197 (D.C.Cir.1992). B. Legal Standard for a 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss A Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss tests the legal sufficiency of a complaint. Browning v. … Machana v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 .

Markowicz v. Johnson

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 20, 2018

The court in Hamilton v. … In Morris v.

Doss v. U.S. Probation Office

District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 2017

Bauer v. Marmara, 942 F.Supp.2d 31, 37 (D.D.C. 2013) (citing Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 (1974)). … DATE: May 12, 2017 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

In Re Club 99, Inc.

82 B.R. 166 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 4, 1988

Trans-Lux Radio City Corp. v. Service Parking Corp., 54 A.2d 144 (D.C.1947). … Frog, Inc. v. Dutch Inns of America, 488 A.2d 925, 931 (D.C.1985). The D.C.

Jordan v. Stokes

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 20, 2020

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).  This complaint begins with what appears to be a claim for pension benefits.

Moses v. Barnes

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 2, 2024

(Dkt. 9) at 3; see id. at 4; see generally Mot. for Leave to Proceed Before Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson (Dkt. 10). … Evans v. U.S. Marshals Serv., 177 F.

Chew v. Quesada

182 F. Supp. 231 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 14, 1960

The only authority cited to sustain the plaintiff’s position is Railroad Retirement Board v. … However, its author, Justice Stone, was to say of Lowden: “[I]t serve[s] both as a footnote and a headstone for the earlier case [Railroad Retirement Board v. Alton Railroad Co.]”

Alton & Southern Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes

883 F. Supp. 755 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 1995

Bonanno Linen Serv., Inc. v. … Co. v. United Transp.

Wiley, Rein & Fielding v. U.S. Department of Commerce

793 F. Supp. 360 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 16, 1992

Weisberg v. U.S. Department of Justice, 745 F.2d 1476, 1496 (D.C.Cir.1984). By bringing this law suit and winning its motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff was able to get the documents released. … Fenster v. Brown, 617 F.2d 740, 742 (D.C.Cir.1979). All of these criteria have been met in this case.

Thompson v. Young

63 F. Supp. 887 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 24, 1945

Rudolph v. United States ex rel. … Apparently the Board, and Commissioners were of the same opinion, with which the Court disagrees.

Dardis v. Shultz

689 F. Supp. 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 15, 1988

United States v. Fausto, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 668, 676 , 98 L.Ed.2d 830 (1988); Morton v. Mancari, 417 U.S. 535 , 94 S.Ct. 2474 , 41 L.Ed.2d 290 (1974). … United States v. Fausto, 108 S.Ct. at 676 .

Cook v. Watson

181 F. Supp. 896 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 1960

Daggett & Ramsdell, Inc. v. Marzall, D.C., 128 F. Supp. 906 ; National Lead Co. v. Kingsland, D.C., 74 F.Supp. 985 . … We have already indicated that this court is not in possession of any relevant evidence that was not considered by the board.

Hale v. Every US President Since 1928

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 29, 2010

Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237,239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). As drafted, this complaint does not identify a claim, establish this court's jurisdiction, or provide the defendants with notice of allegations against them.

Resolute Forest Products, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 12, 2019

Anglers Conservation Network v. Ross, 387 F. Supp. 3d 87, 93 (D.D.C. 2019) (quoting Flaherty v. Pritzker, 17 F. Supp. 3d 52, 55 (D.D.C. 2014)). … v. Leavitt, 415 F.3d 24, 28–29 (D.C.

Holloway v. Bristol-Myers Corporation

327 F. Supp. 17 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 15, 1971

Garney Miller, et al. v. Retail *23 Adjustment Board, (Civil Action No. 900-69, Oct. 8, 1969, Gesell, J.).. … Fitzgerald v. Pan American World Airways, 229 F.2d 499 (2d Cir. 1956) (Civ. il Aeronautics Board lacks such power); Mortimer v.

Rajkovic v. Holder

District Court, District of Columbia · May 28, 2014

Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … v.

Allen v. Holder

District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 2010

. § 3625; see Miller v. Fea'. Bureau ofPrisons, - F. … Supp. 2d 35, 44 (D.D.C. 2009) (stating that "by statute, the BOP's decision to assign a [public safety factor] is not subject to judicial review under the APA") (citing § 3625 and cases); Brown v. Fea’.