Case law

Barnes v. District of Columbia

793 F. Supp. 2d 260 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 2011

Brown lacks personal knowledge of events prior to his assuming that position in January 2006. Id. at ¶ 2. … As support for this they cite a federal case concerning whether a parole board’s decision to deny a convicted sex offender's release on parole was constitutional. Juarez v.

Mvp Sports, Inc. v. Cissna

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2020

Aftab v. Gonzalez, 597 F. Supp. 2d 76, 81 (D.D.C. 2009). … DATE: September 30, 2020 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Sisters of St. Francis Health Services, Inc. v. Schweiker

514 F. Supp. 607 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 27, 1981

The decision of the Provider Reimbursement Review Board on Issue 2 is modified. … The decision of the Provider Reimbursement Review Board on Issue 3 is reversed.

Cancel v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 22, 2024

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Converse v. Brenner

259 F. Supp. 227 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 9, 1966

Thus, the claimed invention fails to satisfy the test of unobviousness laid down by the Supreme Court, and the Board of Appeals must be affirmed. Graham et al. v. … Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v.

Banner Health v. Leavitt

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 7, 2010

Inc., v. … V.

Hodgson v. United Mine Workers

51 F.R.D. 270 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 17, 1970

. §§ 482 , 483, Wirtz v. N. M. U. A., supra; Katrinic v. Wirtz, 62 L.R.R.M. 2557 , 53 L.C. f[ 11,289 (D.D.C.1966). … If the party successful before the Board is not allowed to intervene in the court of appeals and if the court of appeals reverses the Board and returns the case to it for further proceedings, then it is probable that the

Coastal Chemical Co. v. Hodges

235 F. Supp. 1018 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 1964

modify findings by the Board, since the Commissioner is alleged to be without legal authority in this regard. … The Court deems it unwise to permit piecemeal review of Patent Office procedures in this fashion, and has recently so held in Wembley, Inc. v. Commission *1020 er of Patents, 235 F.Supp. 704 , D.C., D.C., C.A.

V. Fennick

District Court, District of Columbia · May 17, 2019

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAY 17 2019 KEVIN FENNICK, ; Bankropion ct and Plaintiff, | v. : Civil Action No. 19-1332 (UNA) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Defendant. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Therefore, the Court will grant the plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss this civil action without prejudice.

Systems and Applied Sciences Corp. v. Sanders

544 F. Supp. 576 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 1982

Oklahoma Aerotronics, Inc. v. United States, 661 F.2d 976 (D.C.Cir.1981). … Also, in an earlier case, Amex Systems, Inc. v.

Nichols v. Billington

402 F. Supp. 2d 48 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 2005

Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)); Charles v. Nat’l Rehab. Hosp., Civ. No. 94-0171, 1994 WL 874211 , at *5 (D.D.C. Sept.29, 1994); Childers v. … Id. at 437 (citing Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C.Cir.1985)); see also Irwin v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 498 U.S. 89, 95-96 , 111 S.Ct. 453 , 112 L.Ed.2d 435 (1990).

Watkins v. Heastie-Graham

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 2026

Evans v. Suter, No. 09–5242, 2010 WL 1632902, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Apr. 2, 2010); see also Hurt v. U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir., 264 F.App’x. 1, 1 (D.C. Cir. 2008); Scholastic Ent., Inc. v. Fox Ent. … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977) (explaining that the purpose of Rule 8 is to give defendants fair notice of a plaintiff’s claims so they made properly respond).

Hickman v. Alderson Court Transcripts Service for the Supreme Court

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 4, 2010

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519,520 (1972). Nonetheless, pro se plaintiffs must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano. 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Connors v. B & W Coal Co., Inc.

646 F. Supp. 164 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 21, 1986

See generally Peick v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 724 F.2d 1247 (7th Cir.1983). … -D.C., Inc. v. Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, 560 F.Supp. 294 (E.D.N.Y.1983).

Hardy v. Hamburg

69 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 23, 2014

(quoting Brown v. General Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 833 (1976))). … See Landgraf v.

Ross v. Barnhart

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 24, 2009

Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d 703, 705 (D.C. Cir. 1986). … Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d 703, 708 (D.C. Cir. 1986).

Jorgensen v. Kingsland

83 F. Supp. 319 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 1949

Citing authorities including Blackford v. Wilder, 28 App.D.C. 535, 542 . In the case of International Cellucotton Products v. … Bijur v. Rushmore, 46 App.D.C. 395 ; Potts v. Kimball, et al., 134 F.2d 327 , 30 C.C.P.A., Patents, 847. Further .it is established by Seymour v.

G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. 19th & K, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 14, 2020

Lopes v. JetsetDC, LLC, 994 F. … Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (the “ABC Board”) as “Vice President and one of the principals” of Ozio. Am. Compl. ¶ 8.

Embassy of the Federal Republic of Nigeria v. Ephraim Emeka Ugwuonye

901 F. Supp. 2d 136 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2012

Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 3 F. Supp. 2d 1473, 1475 (D.D.C. 1998) (quoting Kuwait Airways Corp. v. Am. Sec. Bank, N.A., 890 F.2d 456, 463 n.11 (D.C. Cir. 1989)). … Brown v. Lamb, 414 F.2d 1210, 1212 n.2 (D.C. Cir. 1969). A claim that such “lulling” took place raises factual issues as to when the cause of action first accrued. Cf. Armada De La Republica Argentina v.

D.C. Oil, Inc. v. Exxonmobil Oil Corp.

746 F. Supp. 2d 152 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 29, 2010

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). The complaint need only set forth a short and plain statement of the claim, giving the defendant fair notice of the claim and the grounds upon which it rests. … Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002).