Case law

Rushing v. N.A.A.C.P.

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 17, 2021

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).  Here, the complaint merely alleges that plaintiff “was discriminated against by the N.A.A.C.P.

Williams v. Bywater

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 2024

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). 1  Plaintiff purports to bring two claims: breach of contract and violation of the Privacy Act.

Penny v. U.S. Department of Justice

653 F. Supp. 2d 83 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 14, 2009

See Buggs v. … Bureau v. U.S.

Muldrow v. Emc Mortgage Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2009

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. 5  B.

Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, Jena

40 F.R.D. 318 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 18, 1966

See also North American Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 5 , 12, 240 F.2d 867, 874 (1956), cert, denied 353 U.S. 941 , 77 S.Ct. 815 , 1 L.Ed.2d 760 (1957) (recommendations to Board). … Rosee v. Board of Trade, 36 F.R.D. 684, 689 (N.D.Ill.1965). See also Totten v. United States, supra note 13. . Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 329 F.2d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 1964); Rosee v.

Miller v. Biden

District Court, District of Columbia · May 27, 2022

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).  This complaint alleges hardly any facts, and otherwise falls short of the minimum pleading standard set forth in Rule 8(a).

Mills v. District of Columbia

584 F. Supp. 2d 47 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 30, 2008

Brown v. … Brown, 443 U.S. at 50-51 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 ; United States v. McFayden, 865 F.2d 1306, 1310 (D.C.Cir.1989).

Arthur v. Mudd

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 2010

Patricia Browne Arthur originally brought the case, (see Compl. [# 1]), but she has since been replaced as the shareholder derivative plaintiff by the Federal Housing Finance Agency ("FHFA"), the statutorily-authorized … The other cases were originally captioned as Kellmer v. Raines (Civ. No. 07- I 1173), Middleton v. Raines (Civ. No. 07-1221), and Agnes v. Raines (Civ.

Brooks-Miller v. England

357 F. Supp. 2d 197 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 18, 2004

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999). As previously noted, the D.C. Circuit has held the plaintiff does not need to “plead law or match facts to every element of a legal theory” in her complaint. … Singletary v. District of Columbia, 351 F.3d 519, 524 (D.C.Cir.2003); Brown, 199 F.3d at 452 .

Massie v. Government of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

592 F. Supp. 2d 57 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 30, 2008

Stethem v. … Simon v.

Allied Pilots Ass'n v. American Airlines, Inc.

121 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 22, 2000

See Davenport v. International Bhd. of Teamsters, 166 F.3d 356, 360-61 (D.C.Cir.1999). … See Air Line Pilots Ass’n, International v.

Lettieri v. Federal Marshals

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 2023

Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Still, pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The standard also assists the court in determining whether it has jurisdiction over the subject matter.

Deleon v. Artis, II

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 21, 2018

Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972); Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. Cir. 2008), plaintiff’s allegations in this case neither present a “federal question suitable for decision,” Best v. … See Brown v. WMATA, 164 F. Supp. 3d 33, 35 (D.D.C. 2016) (dismissing case sua sponte for failure to state a claim for relief under Rule 8); see also Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–69 (D.C.

Crockwell v. Austin

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2024

COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ERIN CROCKWELL, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-1649 (BAH) v. … DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff’s Corrected Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 27, is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that this matter be remanded to the Physical Disability Board

Helvestine v. Helvestine

89 F.2d 970 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1937

Story’s Eq.Pl. (10th Ed.) § 40; English v. Foxall (1829) 2 Pet. 595 , 7 L.Ed. 531 ; Tayloe v. Merchants’ Fire Ins. Co., 9 How. 390, 405 , 13 L.Ed. 187 ; Walden v. Bodley, 14 Pet. 156, 164 , 10 L.Ed. 398 ; Texas v. … Hardenberg, 10 Wall. 68 , 19 L.Ed. 839 ; Jones v. Van Doren, 130 U.S. 684, 692 , 9 S.Ct. 685 , 32 L.Ed. 1077 ; Tyler v. Savage, 143 U.S. 79, 90 , 12 S.Ct. 340 , 36 L.Ed. 82 ; Lockhart v.

Ryan-White v. Bryson

922 F. Supp. 2d 19 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 13, 2013

The defendant relies principally on the standard articulated in Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446 (D.C. Cir. 1999). In Brown, the D.C. … Therefore, the defendant’s reliance on Brown is mistaken.

Nurriddin v. Bolden

674 F. Supp. 2d 64 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 4, 2009

Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). … Id. at 103 (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d at 457 ) (emphasis added).

Simmons v. Rosemond

223 F. Supp. 61 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 1963

Thus in Home v. … Thus in Sims v.

National Medical Enterprises, Inc. v. Bowen

725 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 1989

In Heckler v. … V 1987). .

American Postal Workers Union v. United States Postal Service

126 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 15, 2000

Id. at 557 , 84 S.Ct. 909 ; see also Troy Chemical Corp. v. … NLRB v.