Case law

Abramson v. Bennett

707 F. Supp. 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 1989

See, e.g., Cannon v. University of Chicago, 441 U.S. 677 , 99 S.Ct. 1946 , 60 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); Lau v. Nichols, 414 U.S. 563 , 94 S.Ct. 786 , 39 L.Ed.2d 1 (1974); Bossier Parish School Board v. … In Adams v.

Hudson v. Smart

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 18, 2009

Lott Hudson, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). In addition, the complaint must allege facts sufficient to permit the court to determine whether it has jurisdiction over the case.

Abdullah v. Washington

437 F. Supp. 2d 137 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2006

Brown, Deputy Director for Operations at the D.C. Jail, and Judy Lyons, Deputy Warden for Support Services at the D.C. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). The complaint need only set forth a short and plain statement of the claim, giving the defendant fair notice of the claim and the grounds upon which it rests.

Ahmed v. Gable

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 2023

See Watson v. D.C. Water & Sewer Auth., 249 F. Supp. 3d 462, 464 (D.D.C. 2017); Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015). … [his] boarding pass is stamped with an ‘SSSS’ designation, which indicates that he is a ‘known or suspected terrorist.’”); Fikre v.

J.G.G. v. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 2026

See A.A.R.P. v. Trump, 605 U.S. 91, 94–95 (2025). … (citing Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292, 306 (1993)).

Local 1031, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Herzog

98 F. Supp. 613 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 18, 1951

The Board has filed a motion to- dismiss. The Court sustains the motion to dismiss on the authority of N.L.R.B, v. Minn. *614 Mining & Mfg. Co., 8 Cir., 1950, 179 F.2d 323, 325 . … Under the latter statute it was held in Warehousemen’s Union, Local 117, etc. v.

Doe v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 16, 2021

FDIC v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471, 486 (1994); see also Corr. Servs. Corp. v. Malesko, 534 U.S. 61, 69–70 (2001); Kim v. United States, 632 F.3d 713, 715 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (citing Clark v. … Doe challenges the CBP’s decision to prevent him from boarding his flight and its standing decision not to permit him to board future flights departing Guam for the United States.

Wayne v. Unknown

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2025

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, AFL-CIO v. Rogers

186 F. Supp. 114 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 1960

Busby v. Electric Utilities Employees Union, 1944, 323 U.S. 72 , 65 S.Ct. 142 , 89 L.Ed. 78 ; McGrath v. Kristensen, 1950, 340 U.S. 162, 169 , 71 S.Ct. 224 , 95 L.Ed. 173 ; Mastrapasqua v. … See, e. g., Bonetti v.

Psychiatric Institute of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. Harris

501 F. Supp. 314 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 24, 1980

One member of the Board dissented from this decision. … Retroactive application of § 2202.7 was recently held impermissible in John Muir Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Harris, No. 79-2686 (N.D.Cal.

Jamison v. Federal Trade Commission

628 F. Supp. 1548 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 3, 1986

The New York legislature has occasionally considered legislation to limit physician participation on the boards of directors of Blue Shield plans, and a bill limiting such participation to one-fourth of the seats on the boards … See Air Line Pilots Ass’n v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 750 F.2d 81, 88 (D.C.Cir.1984). Plaintiffs argue that TRAC is inapplicable to cases raising constitutional claims.

Miranda v. President of Georgetown College

818 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 21, 1993

O’Brien v. United States, 444 A.2d 946, 948 (D.C.App.1982); Feldt v. … See generally, Dellums v. Powell, 566 F.2d 167, 175-76 (D.C.Cir.1977).

Massachusetts Credit Union Share Insurance v. National Credit Union Administration

693 F. Supp. 1225 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 1, 1988

Diamond v. Charles, 476 U.S. 54, 62 , 106 S.Ct. 1697, 1703 , 90 L.Ed.2d 48 (1986); Valley Forge Christian College v. … The Board shall prescribe by regulation the forms of such signs, the manner of display, the substance of any such statement, and the manner of use. 2 . MSIC cites Clarke v.

Central Iowa Hospital Corp. v. Sebelius

762 F. Supp. 2d 49 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 2011

Luke’s Hosp. v. Sebelius, 611 F.3d 900 (D.C.Cir.2010). In St. … Luke’s Hosp. v.

Cristwell v. Veneman

224 F. Supp. 2d 54 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 17, 2002

(citing Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976); Bayer v. United States Dept. of the Treasury, 956 F.2d 330, 332 (D.C.Cir.1992)). … Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984).

Spadone v. McHugh

842 F. Supp. 2d 295 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 8, 2012

“Generally . . . issues and arguments not made before the relevant military correction board or administrative agency are deemed waived and could not be raised in a judicial tribunal.” Christian v. … for unintentionally failing the Cadet Physical Fitness Test because the Board ignored precedent that disallowed recoupment for failing that test); El Rio Santa Cruz Neighborhood Health Ctr., Inc. v.

Massie v. Government of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

592 F. Supp. 2d 57 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 30, 2008

Stethem v. … Simon v.

Reis v. Fannie Mae

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 3, 2010

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FEB " 3 ZUll] FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA bankruptcy cgu,»¢s Cathy Reis, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 10 89 Fannie Mae et al., Defendants. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Cl€'k, U.S. District and The two-page complaint refers to a patent dispute.

Simmons v. Marsh

564 F. Supp. 379 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 8, 1983

See, e.g., Sanders v. United States, 594 F.2d 804 (Ct.Cl.1979); Powell v. Marsh, 560 F.Supp. 636 (D.D.C.1983); Knehans v. Callaway, 403 F.Supp. 290 (D.D.C.1975), aff’d sub nom., Knehans v. Alexander, 566 F.2d 312 (D.C. … See, e.g., Powell v. Marsh, 560 F.Supp. 636 (D.D. C.1983). Thus, the Court ordinarily reviews only the record (i.e., the evidence before the ABCMR) to determine whether the Board’s decision is supportable.

Fuentes v. Azar

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 17, 2020

Tobias, the Chairperson of HHS’s Departmental Appeals Board. See Compl. ¶¶ 13–18. … Wilbur v. U.S. ex rel. Kadrie, 281 U.S. 206, 218 (1930); see also U.S. ex rel. McLennan v.