Case law

United States Ex Rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.

952 F. Supp. 2d 108 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 2013

KBR and Daoud deny Barko’s allegations, and move this 4/ Doc. 64-1. 5/ Doc. 91. 6/ United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 800 F. … Joseph v. Cannon, 642 F.2d 1373, 1385 (D.C. Cir. 1981)). 24/ United States ex rel. Brown v. Aramark Corp., 591 F. Supp. 2d 68, 72 (D.D.C. 2008). 25/ United States ex rel.

Ficken v. AMR Corp.

578 F. Supp. 2d 134 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2008

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 .

Travelers United, Inc. v. Hyatt Hotels Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 3, 2025

See Busic v. Transportation Sec. Admin., 62 F.4th 547, 549 (D.C. Cir. 2023); Tanner-Brown v. Jewell, 153 F. Supp. 3d 102, 107 (D.D.C. 2016) (RC), aff’d sub nom. Tanner-Brown v. Zinke, 709 F. App’x 17 (D.C. … Cir. 2019); see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.

Level the Playing Field v. Federal Election Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2019

serving on the Board.” … (Brown Decl. at ¶ 35.) Thus, third party candidates have proven that they can achieve the level of support required by the CPD.

Eastman Kodak Co. v. Coe

40 F. Supp. 891 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 4, 1941

The chief ground upon which the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office denied the allowance of the claim sought by the plaintiff was that the product claimed was anticipated by an article described in a publication written … V.

United States v. Waters

73 F. Supp. 72 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 26, 1947

This sufficiently established that defendant had the pistol "about his person" within the meaning of the statute, as decided by the United States Court of Appeals in Brown v. … See People v. Grass, 79 Misc. 457 , 141 N.Y.S. 204 ; People v. Ross, 60 Cal.App. 163 , 212 P. 627 .

Lewis v. Elliott

628 F. Supp. 512 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 17, 1986

Absolute privilege attaches to statements made “preliminary to or in the course of a judicial proceeding” Brown v. Collins, 402 F.2d 209, 212 (D.C.Cir.1968) (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 587). … Nicklos Drilling Co., 648 F.2d 1063, 1065 (5th Cir.1981) or to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, Silver v. Secretary of the Army, 554 F.2d 664, 665 (5th Cir.1977).

Miller v. Caldera

138 F. Supp. 2d 10 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 2001

In each year, the Army’s Order of Merit Board (“Merit Board”) denied him a promotion. … Contractors of Am. v.

Alston v. Flagstar Bank, F.S.B.

969 F. Supp. 2d 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 18, 2013

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). The motion does not test a plaintiff’s ultimate likelihood of success on the merits, but rather, whether a plaintiff has properly stated a claim. Scheuer v. … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Forbes v. Brownell

149 F. Supp. 848 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 1957

In re: William George Forbes, August 23, 1954, File T-2719192, United States Department of Justice, Board of Immigration Appeals. . 28 U.S.C. § 2201 ; And see Brownell v. … McKenzie v. Savoretti, 5 Cir., 1952, 200 F.2d 546 ; Vidal y Planas v. Landon, D.C.S.D.Cal.1952, 104 F.Supp. 384 , and cases therein cited.

Woodall v. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 17, 2025

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The amended petition is neither short nor plain, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a), the allegations cannot be described as simple, concise, and direct, see Fed. R. Civ.

Thomas v. Nicholson

539 F. Supp. 2d 205 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2008

Thomas v. Principi, 394 F.3d 970, 974 (D.C.Cir.2005); see also United States v. … ); Glarner v.

Smith v. Psp Troop K Media

District Court, District of Columbia · May 24, 2024

Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Here, as presented, neither the court nor the defendants can reasonably be expected to identify plaintiff’s intended claims.

Crisp v. Walker

District Court, District of Columbia · May 17, 2010

CRISP, ) Plaintiff, § g ` v. § Civil Action No. … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977).

O'Diah v. United States Small Business Administration

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 12, 2025

Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972); Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. Cir. 2008). … Jafari v. United States, 83 F. Supp. 3d 277, 279 (D.D.C. 2015) (quoting Rollins v. Wackenhut Servs., Inc., 703 F.3d 122, 127 (D.C. Cir. 2012)), aff’d, 621 F. App’x 676 (D.C. Cir. 2015); see also Tate v.

Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, Jena

40 F.R.D. 318 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 18, 1966

See also North American Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 5 , 12, 240 F.2d 867, 874 (1956), cert, denied 353 U.S. 941 , 77 S.Ct. 815 , 1 L.Ed.2d 760 (1957) (recommendations to Board). … Rosee v. Board of Trade, 36 F.R.D. 684, 689 (N.D.Ill.1965). See also Totten v. United States, supra note 13. . Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 329 F.2d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 1964); Rosee v.

Ford v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance

691 F. Supp. 1484 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 1988

Believing she had been cheated in connection with that purchase, Ford brought suit against Brown; John P. … Celotex Corp. v.

Schering Corp. v. Marzall

101 F. Supp. 571 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 6, 1951

Under the decisions of the Court of Appeals for this jurisdiction in the cases of New York Life Insurance Co. v. Taylor, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 66 , 147 F.2d 297 , and Clainos v. … In Senkus v.

Hilliard v. Amtrak

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 3, 2014

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (quoting Conley v. Gz`bson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)). … See Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Nor do his submissions plead sufficient factual allegations to state a plausible age discrimination claim.

Lantry v. Kendall

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2024

Ryan-White v. Blank, 922 F. … See Flete-Garcia v. U.S. Marshals Serv., 613 F.