Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

5.25s

  • Lewis v. Rumsfeld

    154 F. Supp. 2d 56 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 2001

    Secretary of Defense, 68 F.3d 1396 , 1400-04 & n. 8 (D.C.Cir.1995) (Army Board’s determination that waiver of limitations periods was not ‘in the interest of justice’ was reviewable; Board was not ‘given unfettered and standardless … In Dowds v.

    Cited 113 timesPublished
  • Montel v. City of Springfield

    386 F. Supp. 3d 67 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 2019

    See Kisela v. Hughes , 138 S. … Board of the Cty. Comm'rs v. Brown , 520 U.S. 397 , 409, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Patel v. Howard University

    896 F. Supp. 199 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 1, 1995

    ."); Cahn v. … See Asuncion v. Columbia Hosp.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Savage

    538 F. Supp. 2d 34 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 10, 2008

    Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 3 F.Supp.2d 1473, 1475 (D.D.C.1998) (citing Kuwait Airways Corp. v. Am. Sec. Bank, N.A., 890 F.2d 456 , 463 n. 11 (D.C.Cir.1989)).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Humberson v. United States Attorney's Office for District of Columbia

    236 F. Supp. 2d 28 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 2003

    Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Adams v. U.S. Department of Justice

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2010

    Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Loughlin v. United States

    209 F. Supp. 2d 165 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 2002

    City Lights School, Inc., 124 F.Supp.2d 707, 709 (D.D.C.2000) (quoting Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 717 A.2d 309, 311-12 (D.C.1998)). … Under the common law rule that “a landowner should be held to the duty of common prudence in maintaining his property in such a way as to prevent injury to his neighbor’s property,” Brown, 717 A.2d at 316 (citing Dudley v

    Vacated by Loughlin, Thomas P. v. United States, 393 F.3d 155 (2004)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Moore v. United States

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 24, 2010

    Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237,239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nunez v. Theyer

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 13, 2015

    P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 US. 662, 678—79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668—71 (DC. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff is a prisoner at the Federal Correctional Institution in Oakdale, Louisiana. He purports to sue United States Attorney Christopher R.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Venture Capital Association v. Duke

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 2018

    Taucher v. Brown-Hruska, 396 F.3d 1168, 1173 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (citation omimtted). … Nor were Plaintiffs’ hours so excessive as to merit an across-the-board reduction.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ratley v. United States Postal Service

    953 F. Supp. 2d 270 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 2013

    Watson v. … Counselors v. C.I.A., 898 F.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Washington v. District of Columbia Housing Authority

    170 F. Supp. 3d 234 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 2016

    Bowden v. United States, 106 F.3d 433, 437 (D.C.Cir.1997) (citing Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C.Cir.1985)). The defen- dant bears the burden of producing evi- dence demonstrating non-exhaustion. Id. … Johnson v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Tavoulareas v. Piro

    93 F.R.D. 24 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 1981

    See Hubbard v. … Piro & Tavoulareas v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Arnold v. White House

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 2025

    Jiggetts v. District of Columbia, 319 F.R.D. 408, 413 (D.D.C. 2017), aff’d sub nom. Cooper v. District of Columbia, No. 17-7021, 2017 WL 5664737 (D.C. Cir. Nov. 1, 2017) (quoting T.M. v. District of Columbia, 961 F. … See Brown v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 164 F. Supp. 3d 33, 35 (D.D.C. 2016). At this point, the court does not find that further opportunities to amend will save Ms. Arnold’s claims.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pereira v. Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 2011

    P. 8(a); see Ashcrofl v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. l937, 1950 (2009); Cl'ralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 66l, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Malone v. Bush

    District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2010

    P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661,668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977) .. / fl ,/ Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, sues former President George H. W.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anmed Health v. Azar

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 15, 2022

    Id. § 412.92(b)(1)(v). … Corp. v. Sebelius, 657 F.3d 1, 13 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (citing Bowen v. Georgetown Univ. Hosp., 488 U.S. 204, 208 (1988)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Noisette v. GEITHNER

    693 F. Supp. 2d 60 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2010

    Bowden, 106 F.3d at 437 (emphasis added); see also Bayer v. U.S. Dep’t of Treasury, 956 F.2d 330, 332 (D.C.Cir.1992) (“This administrative remedies exhaustion requirement is mandatory.” (citing Brown v. Gen. Servs. … See Bowden, 106 F.3d at 437 ; see also Ikossi v. Dep’t of Navy, 516 F.3d 1037, 1044 (D.C.Cir.2008); Brown, 111 F.2d at 16. “In the D.C.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Davis v. District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service

    481 F. Supp. 1178 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 1979

    Until the decision of Afroyim v. … See, e. g., Nishikawa v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Hickman v. Archives

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 6, 2010

    See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519,520 (1972). Evenpro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff demands "payment of any royalty payments for use of copyrights, trademarks, [and] patents," an amount which "could exceed [$] 1 billion."

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.