Case law

Malone v. United States District

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2010

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 66l, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Calzfarzo, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977).

Espino v. U. S. Department of Justice

District Court, District of Columbia · May 16, 2011

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661,668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977).

United States v. Bertelsmann Se & Co. Kgaa

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 7, 2022

FTC v. HJ. Heinz Co., 246 F.3d 708, 713 (D.C. Cir. 2001) (emphasis in original) (cleaned up) (quoting Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 323). … TC v. Staples, Inc., 970 F. Supp. 1066, 1075 (D.D.C. 1997) (“Staples I’). Brown Shoe’s practical indicia also may help identify a market of targeted sellers. See FTC v.

Hickman v. the Pentagon of the United States of America

District Court, District of Columbia · May 26, 2009

ankruptcy Courts Derian Douglas Hickman, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Compliance with Rule 8(a)'s requirements should also provide a court with sufficient information to determine whether it has jurisdiction over the claims.

Putnam v. Centerra Group, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 2026

He appealed the clearance revocation to the Merit Systems Protection Board, which held that it had no authority to review “a security-clearance determination underlying a removal.” Id. at 525. … E.g., Lee v. Garland, 120 F.4th 880, 888 (D.C. Cir. 2024); Bennett v. Chertoff, 425 F.3d 999, 1001 (D.C. Cir. 2005); Dorfmont v. Brown, 913 F.2d 1399, 1401 (9th Cir. 1990); Makky v.

Amissah v. Gallaudet University

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 20, 2019

See Brown v. … Brown, 789 F.3d at 151 (quoting Richardson v. United States, 193 F.3d 545, 548 (D.C. Cir. 1999).

Velazquez Ordonez v. Shaw-Wilder

District Court, District of Columbia · May 20, 2026

See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Ordonez’s filings flunk these tests. First, it is not clear what events prompted his lawsuit and what claims Ordonez brings. … Whiting v. AARP, 637 F.3d 355, 364 (D.C. Cir. 2011).

Slovinec v. Meisburg

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 2010

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661,668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Nickerson-Malpher v. United States of America

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 30, 2012

S(a); see Ashcrofl v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2()09); Cl`ralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 493 (D.D.C. 1977).

McCarter v. Bank of New York

873 F. Supp. 2d 246 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 9, 2012

Kowal v. MCI Commc’ns Corp., 16 F.3d 1271, 1276 (D.C. Cir. 1994). … Poblete v. Gola’berg, 680 F. Supp. 2d 18, 19 (D.D.C. 2009) (citing Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977)).

Taylor v. United States District Court

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 14, 2014

Jarrell v. Tz`sch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff, who currently is incarcerated at the l\/lc[)owell Federal Correctional institution in Welch, West Virginia, demands the return of personal property.

Solomon v. University of Southern California

255 F.R.D. 303 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 20, 2009

The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) then granted USC leave to belatedly oppose Solomon’s trademark application on the grounds that the term “HoloDeck” was generic. … Niedermeier v. Office of Baucus, 153 F. Supp. 2d 23, 28 (D.D.C. 2001) (citing Anyanwutaku v. Moore, 151 F.3d 1053, 1057 (D.C. Cir. 1998)).

League of Women Voters of the United States v. Newby

195 F. Supp. 3d 80 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 29, 2016

The individuals Marvin and JoAnn Brown moved to Kansas from Arkansas in 2014. Compl. ¶ 14-15. … Legal Found, v.

Dagi v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

352 F. Supp. 3d 116 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 11, 2018

Day v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. , 528 F.2d 31 (2d Cir. 1975) involved injuries from terrorist acts of shooting and throwing grenades at passengers waiting in line to board the defendant's airliner. Id. at 32 . … In MacDonald v.

Lipsman v. Secretary of the Army

257 F. Supp. 2d 3 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2003

Smerkiewicz v. … Rapaport v.

Evans v. Williams

139 F. Supp. 2d 79 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2001

V. Conclusion A. … V.

Anderson v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 14, 2011

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (l972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Gutierrez v. Laird

346 F. Supp. 289 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 1972

Noyd v. Bond, 395 U.S. 683, 694-696 , 89 S.Ct. 1876, 1883 , 23 L.Ed.2d 631 (1969). In Levy v. … The court in Gruenwald v.

Federal Trade Commission v. Swedish Match

131 F. Supp. 2d 151 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 14, 2000

See Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 324 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). … See Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 ; Rothery Storage & Van Co. v.

Ashbourne v. Hansberry

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 2025

at 11-13 (citing Ethnic Emps. of Libr. of Cong. v. Boorstin, 751 F.2d 1405, 1415-16 (D.C. Cir. 1985), and Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820 (1976)). … Moreover, the court did rely on Brown in holding that “Title VII ‘provides the exclusive judicial remedy for claims of discrimination in federal employment,’” ECF No. 41, at 17 (quoting Brown, 425 U.S. at 835), which “