Case law

Young-Robinson Associates, Inc. v. United States

760 F. Supp. 212 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 1991

This passage is not, however, clearly applicable. It does not appear in 13 C.F.R. § 124.309 (a), the SBA regulation cited by the Glenn letter and relied upon by Air Force officials. … Thus, any business small enough to qualify as a small business in the warehousing trade was small enough to qualify as a small business in the local business trade, and error in the Interim Solicitation was harmless.

Southern California Edison Co. v. United States Postal Service

134 F. Supp. 3d 311 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2015

To nonetheless issue a revenue deficiency for the entirety of Plaintiff’s discounted-workshare rate for eighteen months is so disproportionate that it can hardly qualify as reasoned decisionmaking. … It neither clearly identified the exception to the Management Instruction’s plain twelve-month limitation nor established how SCE’s noncompliance was “ongoing.”

Mead v. Holder

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 22, 2011

do qualify. … It therefore follows that both decisions, whether positive or negative, are clearly economic ones.

Hardy v. Government of the District of Columbia

283 F.R.D. 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 22, 2012

The class is, therefore, now clearly defined. B. … Even assuming interest were to apply to those sums, the calculation of damages claims in this case would clearly be a mechanical task.

Carswell v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n Intern.

540 F. Supp. 2d 107 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 2008

Airways, nor does he claim that he was qualified for another position but was passed over due to age discrimination.” … GenCorp Inc., 896 F.2d 1457, 1469 (6th Cir.1990) (“This Circuit has clearly established that an employer has no duty under the ADEA to permit an employee to transfer to another position or to displace workers with less seniority

American Legion v. Derwinski

827 F. Supp. 805 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 19, 1993

The CDC had qualified the study’s potential within the protocol, noting that “[sjince many of the proposed procedures are untested, modifications, indeed even a recommendation not to proceed with the Agent Orange study, may … Defense Council, 462 U.S. 87, 103 , 103 S.Ct. 2246, 2255 , 76 L.Ed.2d 437 (1983); see also Ethyl Corp., 541 F.2d at 36 (“We must look at the [agency’s] decision not as the chemist, biologist or statistician that we are qualified

Inter-Con Securities Systems, Inc. v. Orr

574 F. Supp. 250 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 1983

Delta had clearly stated in its bid, at paragraph K.19, that it was submitting the bid on behalf of a joint venture in which it was joined by Windsor Security and Investigations, Inc. … This assessment by the Bureau demonstrates that the contracting officer’s conclusions were not clearly wrong or without rational basis.

Donohoe v. BONNEVILLE INT'L CORP.

602 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2009

discriminated against him because of his age by improperly including him in the Reduction in Force (“RIF”) conducted in Bonneville’s Washington, D.C. office, and by subsequently selecting Matt Spacciapoli, a younger, allegedly less-qualified … It appears that the magis *7 trate judge accepted Bonneville’s contentions and Donohoe has not established that accepting these arguments was clearly erroneous.

United States v. Anderson

384 F. Supp. 2d 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 1, 2005

The behavior underlying these charged of *36 fenses clearly suggests that Mr. Anderson is a flight risk. See United States v. … immunity.

Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc. v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 2025

authority or unconstitutionally’ are not barred by sovereign immunity.” … In the former context, the sovereign itself never suffers a loss of immunity because in circumstances where the Larson-Dugan exception is applied due to employees’ ultra vires conduct “there is no sovereign immunity to

Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans, Association, Inc. v. Eric Shinseki

82 F. Supp. 3d 443 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 2015

as docking and is not sufficient to establish presumptive exposure to herbicides, unless the Veteran served as a coxswain and reports going ashore during anchorage.” … In this case, the Secretary has clearly made an actual decision, so even under Broudy this Court lacks jurisdiction.

Psak v. Jewell

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2020

Under that framework, the plaintiff must first establish a prima facie case of discrimination. Id. … Although the parties agree that the video was offensive and inappropriate for the workplace, see Dkt. 52 at 42 (Defendant conceding that the video was 17 “clearly inappropriate

Medina v. District of Columbia

517 F. Supp. 2d 272 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 6, 2007

As a Hispanic, plaintiff is clearly a member of a protected class. … Circuit held that a state actor enjoys Eleventh Amendment immunity from a suit for damages under § 1981. See Quik Serve Foods, Inc. v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. 06-7092, 2006 U.S.App.

Mohamed v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.

215 F. Supp. 3d 85 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 19, 2016

To establish standing, a party must, at a constitutional minimum, meet the following criteria. … His Amended Complaint clearly alleged all the facts needed to state such a claim — he asked SPS in a written communication to identify the owner of the mortgage loan and SPS never responded. See Am. Compl., ¶¶ 27-28.

Sissel v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

951 F. Supp. 2d 159 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 28, 2013

Id. 2 The term “applicable individual” is defined as any individual that does not qualify for one of four enumerated exceptions. … Even assuming that the Origination Clause contains a germaneness requirement, and assuming that the question of compliance with such a requirement is justiciable, Flint established a very loose conception of germaneness

Baumann v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2010

particular disclosure to a public body that qualifies as protected under the DCWPA. … Council knows how to create a private right of action when it wants to, and it clearly chose not to create one here.

McManus v. Kelly

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 2019

Her resume also fails to clearly and succinctly identify her knowledge, responsibilities, or abilities in a fashion that permits the reader to evaluate her qualification and experiences. … A disparity in qualifications, however, can only support an inference of discrimination where the plaintiff is “markedly more qualified,” “substantially more qualified,” or “significantly better qualified,” than the successful

Christian v. Washington District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2026

The Fourteenth Amendment provides that “[n]o State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty … Here, the actions alleged in the Complaint simply do not qualify as egregious conduct that “shocks the conscience.” See Phillips, 455 F.3d at 403; see Psychas v. Dist.

State of Kansas v. United States

797 F. Supp. 1042 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 1992

See 476 U.S. at 902 , 106 S.Ct. at 2320 (noting that the right has been located in the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV, the Commerce Clause, the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, … Then, a congressional enactment that limited the flights from that airport to certain states would clearly implicate the right to interstate travel. 21 .

Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. American Employers Insurance

557 F. Supp. 225 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 28, 1983

Clearly the interests of justice demand that this case be transferred to the District of Massachusetts in order to obtain as promptly as possible a single coherent, consistent judgment covering all insurers of Eagle-Picher … As far as the EaglePicher segment of this burgeoning litigation burden is concerned, the District of *228 Massachusetts is without question best qualified to achieve this result.