Case law

Qtaish v. Washington, Dc

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 28, 2023

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v.

Pintro v. Genachowski

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 12, 2019

Forkkio v. Powell, 306 F.3d 1127, 1130 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)). … See Browne v. Donovan, 12 F.

Davis v. Vilsack

880 F. Supp. 2d 156 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 1, 2012

P. 12(b)(6); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. … Irwin, 498 U.S. at 96 (citing Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 (1984)).

Brett v. Bush

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 4, 2009

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Australia/Eastern U.S.A. Shipping Conference v. United States

537 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 19, 1982

(Chilling effect of required teacher disclosure to board of education of all organizational associations for the past five years outweighs any legitimate state interest in the information). Bates v. … The court compared the power of the Commission over the economic livelihood of longshoremen to the power of the board of education over the teachers in Shelton v.

Conway v. Conway

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 2014

S(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff is a resident of Chapel Hill, North Carolina, who purports to sue various individuals.

Kakeh v. United Planning Organization

657 F. Supp. 2d 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 24, 2009

Casey relied on the reasoning and holding in Crawford Fitting Co. v. J.T. … Most recently, in Arlington Central School District Board of Education v.

Sudah v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 2025

Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (quoting Richardson v. United States, 193 F.3d 545, 548 (D.C. … Berrios v. NYC Hous.

Rhett v. US District Court

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 20, 2010

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).  ] • t!

Smith v. Penndot

District Court, District of Columbia · May 24, 2024

Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Here, as presented, neither the court nor the defendant can reasonably be expected to identify plaintiff’s intended claims.

Jafarzadeh v. Duke

270 F. Supp. 3d 296 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 7, 2017

See Horne v. Flores, 557 U.S. 433, 446 (2009) (citing Arlington Heights v. Metro. Housing Dev. … See, e.g., McCreath v. Holder, 573 F.3d 38, 41 (1st Cir. 2009); Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243, 1247 (9th Cir. 2008); Hamdan v. Gonzales, 425 F.3d 1051, 1061 (7th Cir. 2005); Nativi-Gomez v.

Colbert v. McCartny

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 24, 2010

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 5l9, 520 (l972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. l987). … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977). Plaintiff sues Judge McCamy because he "like many other harassed [plaintiff] and discriminated against [him], using and abusing" the authority of his office.

Foreman v. Department of the Navy

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 9, 2019

Havens v. Mabus, 146 F. … If, for example, a board’s “‘explanation for its determination . . . lacks any coherence,’ the [Court] ‘owe[s] no deference to [the board’s] purported expertise.” Haselwander v. McHugh, 774 F.3d 990, 996 (D.C.

Loya-Medina v. Gaoutte

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 15, 2015

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 US. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668—71 (DC. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff is a prisoner at the Federal Correctional Center in Oakdale, Louisiana.

Mobley v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

907 F. Supp. 495 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 29, 1995

Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Browning, 839 F.Supp. 1508, 1512 (W.D.Okla.1993). See also Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. … For the reasons stated in Browning and Christ , the regulations now preempt state law. 2 .

Hickman v. Department of Commerce

District Court, District of Columbia · May 4, 2009

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519,520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Union Employers Division of Printing Industry of Washington, D. C., Inc. v. Columbia Typographical Union No. 101

353 F. Supp. 1348 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 5, 1973

As the Supreme Court said in United Steelworkers of America v. … United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior and Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574, 581-582 , 80 S.Ct. 1347, 1352 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1409 (1960). 6 . San Franeisco-Oakland Newspaper Guild v.

United States v. Yunis

681 F. Supp. 896 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 1988

See Demjanjuk v. … See Tel-Oren v.

Williams v. Obama

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 16, 2011

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).  SUMMARY MEMORANDUM AND OPINION; NOT INTENDED FOR PUBLICATION.  Plaintiff filed his 62-page original complaint on June 3, 2011. … Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47-48, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957).

Colbert v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 19, 2010

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519,520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).