Case law

Zakeri v. Blinken

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 2, 2024

And “monetary harm[]” relating to a business has been held to “readily qualify as [a] concrete injur[y] under Article III.” TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 594 U.S. 413, 425 (2021). … Plaintiff asserts that “the U.S. government has already issued an absurd finding of inadmissibility due to immigrant intent” and that this finding “is clearly a fig leaf to cover a discriminatory decision to not let someone

Laker Airways Ltd. v. Pan American World Airways

103 F.R.D. 42 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 1984

Indeed, the Rules clearly contemplate their applicability abroad if the United States Court has jurisdiction. See, e.g., Rule 28(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. … This implicates both United States public policy interests of a special significance 20 and well-established foreign antagonisms to those laws. 21 Those antagonisms are heightened here because, as noted, Lufthansa is owned

Bailey v. District of Columbia

839 F. Supp. 888 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 1993

“The establishment of reasonableness is the petitioner’s burden.” In re Oliver L. North (Schultz Fee Application), 8 F.3d 847, 852 (D.C.Cir.1993). … INTEREST Plaintiffs are clearly not entitled to an award of current, rather than historical, rates for their legal services in this ease. The delay in payment has been extremely brief.

Public Citizen v. National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods

708 F. Supp. 359 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 25, 1988

I On March 18, 1988, the Secretary of Agriculture established the National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods (the Committee). … Clearly the combination of these statements do not amount to a particular bias. 7 .

Carrington v. Pompeo

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2020

Id. ¶ 10. 5 In plaintiff’s 2016 review, the deputy chief of mission stated that “[i]f she were in the senior ranks, where she clearly belongs, [her] achievements would warrant merit pay. … Subject Matter Jurisdiction Under Rule 12(b)(1), the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence. See Lujan v.

Smith v. Obama

217 F. Supp. 3d 283 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 21, 2016

At the pleading stage, this requires Plaintiff to “‘clearly . . . allege facts demonstrating’ each element.” Id. (quoting Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 518 (1975)). … The school board-appellants believed that their doing so would violate the Establishment Clause. Id. at 240.

Baptist Memorial Hospital v. Sebelius

765 F. Supp. 2d 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 28, 2011

Title XIX of the Social Security Act, known as the Medicaid statute, establishes a federal-state program to provide medical assistance to low-income patients. See id. §§ 1396-1396v. … But as the record clearly indicates, and as Baptisb-Memphis concedes, expansion waiver days were excluded prior to the Intermediary’s audit. See Pl.’s SJM at 13; Pl.’s Reply at 4-5; A.R. 121, 127-28.

Davis v. District of Columbia Child and Family Services Agency,et Al

246 F. Supp. 3d 367 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2017

Porchia- Usher stated that CFSA would need “to be conscious that all FSW know the expectations” and that “performance evaluations [clearly] outline the current position expectations.” … Bronars notes that half of the interested and qualified applicants for the FSW positon were age 40 and above. Id.

Blackman v. District of Columbia

328 F. Supp. 2d 46 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2004

The Court concludes that this Order altered the legal relationship of the parties, by ordering the defendants to take certain steps on behalf of plaintiff or face sanctions, and clearly satisfies the “judicial imprimatur” … If this amount is not paid within 30 days, it will bear interest at the rate established by 28 U.S.C. § 1961 from the 31st calendar day following entry of this Order. . SO ORDERED. 1 .

Janssen Biotech, Inc. v. Celltrion Healthcare Co.

296 F. Supp. 3d 336 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 31, 2017

Standing To establish that the court has subject matter jurisdiction, the plaintiff has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that it has standing to sue. See Lujan v. … The Agreements are poorly drafted and do not clearly identify the intended assignee of the rights at issue.

Landmark Legal Foundation v. Environmental Protection Agency

910 F. Supp. 2d 270 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 2012

The circuits split on whether courts should balance the four preliminary injunction factors on a sliding scale, as they have traditionally done, or whether each factor must now be established independently. The D.C. … Furthering of Public Interest The public interest clearly favors agency processing of FOIA requests as quickly as possible.

Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety v. Federal Trade Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 6, 2021

Respondent discloses, clearly and conspicuously, and in close proximity to such representation, any qualifying information related to open recalls, including but not limited … Supp. 3d 21, 34 (D.D.C. 2015) (noting that the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing standing).

Bridges Public Charter School v. Barrie

District Court, District of Columbia · May 6, 2010

Once a child is found to qualify for a free appropriate public education, the school 1 Christopher Anwah and the Law Offices of Christopher Anwah, PLLC, have answered Bridges's complaint. … is whether Bridges has alleged facts that, taken as true, demonstrate that the due process complaint was "frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation," or that defendants continued to litigate "after the litigation clearly

Amirentezam v. Islamic Republic of Iran

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 5, 2023

Supp. 3d 158, 165 (D.D.C. 2020) (qualifying Professor Gabbay “as an expert in the current conditions in Iran, the treatment of prisoners in Iran, and the regime’s use of torture”). 8 In reaching his opinions, Professor … Plaintiffs contend that sovereign immunity should be waived because Amir-Entezam was tortured and taken hostage by Iran. See ECF No. 26 at 10–23.

New York State Bar Ass'n v. Federal Trade Commission

276 F. Supp. 2d 110 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 11, 2003

Dictionary 1171 (1993) (“an established society or corporation: an establishment or foundation especially] of a public character”). … This is clearly not the case with the GLBA.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. U.S. Department of Justice

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 19, 2024

The Government, consequently, has not carried its burden of establishing a harm that would follow from the disclosure of its Exemption 5 withholdings. … The weekly reports, to start, clearly summarize updates in investigations being handled by DRS. See Vaughn Index at 1–2.

Klayman v. Porter

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 16, 2025

Cir. 2024); (2) affirmed this Court’s “dismissal of the plaintiff’s claims for damages on immunity grounds,” id.; (3) “reverse[d] in part [this Court’s] dismissal of … In opposition, the plaintiff argued that “[t]he problem with [the defendants’] argument is clearly evident: [the plaintiff] has not been allowed any discovery on this matter,” Pl.’s Opp’n at 9, and because the defendants

Gregory v. Kijakazi

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 12, 2022

Statutory and Regulatory Background “To qualify for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the [Social Security] Act, [a claimant] must establish that []he is ‘disabled … The ALJ clearly did not discount Gregory’s testimony about the severity of his symptoms based on lack of objective evidence alone. He cited other evidence in the record, including Gregory’s own account.

Doe v. United States Department of Justice

660 F. Supp. 2d 31 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 6, 2009

. ¶ 39); (3) DOJ failed to establish rules of conduct for persons involved in the operation and maintenance of its system of records, in violation of subsection (e)(9) (Id. ¶ 40); and (4) DOJ failed to establish safeguards … Adverse Effect Even if DOJ’s disclosure to the Unemployment Commission and Talkx did not qualify as a “routine use,” plaintiffs claim would still fail because he has not established that he suffered an “adverse effect” as

United States v. Giraldo-Serna

118 F. Supp. 3d 377 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 7, 2015

See Credit Suisse AG, 2014 WL 5026739 , at *4 (“Although a person seeking to assert vic-timhood. status may believe that a' defendant should have been charged with an additional or different crime, the CVRA clearly states … Evidence of his killing establishes an essential element of the conspiracy, its object.”); see also Sharp, 463 F.Supp,2d at 564 n. 16 (explaining that in the context of a conspiracy, a "crime victim” may also include one