Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.43s
District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 14, 2011
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 5 l9, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977). Plaintiff submits his complaint on preprinted form without attachments. The sections titled "Statement of Claim" and "Relief’ are blank.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 2016
Thompson, 682 F.3d 285, 289 (3d Cir. 2010); United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 338 (4th Cir. 2011); United States v. Smith, 658 F.3d 608, 611 (6th Cir. 2011); United States v. … Dixon, 387 F.3d 356, 359 (7th Cir. 2012); United States v. Browne, 698 F.3d 1042, 1045 (8th Cir. 2012); United States v. Austin, 676 F.3d 924, 927 (9th Cir. 2012); United States v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Nov 3, 2010
The plaintiff counters that the doctrine of collateral estoppel does not apply in this case, relying on the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decision in Brown v. Jonz, 572 A.2d 455 (D.C. 1990). … The plaintiff’s reliance on Brown is misplaced. The actual holding in Brown pertained only to the tolling of the statute of limitations while the plaintiff was incarcerated. In Smith v.
Cited 0 timesPublished866 F. Supp. 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 20, 1994
Presley v. … First, there is significant overlap in the geographic range and regulatory power afforded the two boards.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSafeway Trails, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
176 F. Supp. 201 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 17, 1959
In the present case, the opinions of the Joint Board, Division 1, and the Commission, ■when read with the ultimate decision that the grant was required by the public convenience and necessity, cf. United States v. … Greensboro-High Point Airport Authority v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 1956, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 358 , 231 F.2d 517 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 2010
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Oralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Nov 2, 2010
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff, a resident of Oxon Hill, Maryland, sues Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner but for what conduct is unknown.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Dec 10, 2010
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Oralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). , Plaintiff, a resident of Ox on Hill, Maryland, sues an individual apparently associated with Shoppers Food Warehouse in District Heights, Maryland.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Dec 10, 2010
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661,668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). / Ii' Plaintiff, a resident of Oxon Hill, Maryland, sues United States Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPierce v. District of Columbia
146 F. Supp. 3d 197 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 25, 2015
Ctr. v. Advantage Healthplan Inc., 985 F. … See Singh v. George Washington Univ., 383 F.
Cited 4 timesPublishedGamache v. Iam National Pension Fund
District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 24, 2025
he wanted “to make certain that all evidence is submitted properly to the board.” … Compare Miller v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Oct 31, 2012
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. l987). … Brown v. Calz`fano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). In its entirety, the complaint states: Each named Defendant conspired to fix the out come [sic] of NYS Supreme court Case NO. 400422/2011.
Cited 0 timesPublished271 F. Supp. 2d 30 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 2, 2002
Substantial evidence is “ ‘such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.’ ” Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d 703, 705 (D.C.Cir.1986) (quoting Richardson v. … See Brown, 794 F.2d at 706 .
Cited 25 timesPublishedMcKinley v. Federal Deposit Insurance
756 F. Supp. 2d 105 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 23, 2010
Exemption 8 The FDIC also asserts Exemption 8 of FOIA and the Sunshine Act, which are identical, to withhold significant portions of the board meeting minutes and the memoranda from agency staff to the board. … Corp. v. U.S.
Cited 23 timesPublishedEagle Trust Fund v. U.S. Postal Service
District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 4, 2019
Based on inferences drawn from Leedom v. Kyne, 358 U.S. 184 (1958), and Board of Governors of the Fed. Reserve System v. … DATE: February 4, 2019 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Nov 14, 2025
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Notably, “[a] confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.” Cheeks v. Fort Myer Constr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMatthews v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 22, 2009
Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The Complaint fails to meet the requirements of Rule 8(a). … The complaint does not make clear what conduct or decision by the V A gives rise to this complaint.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Feb 9, 2024
Reply) at 9; 59-17 (Dep. of Alvon Brown) at 39:25–40:7; 59-9 (Dep. of Felicia Wintz) at 17:22–25. … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished641 F. Supp. 228 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 2, 1986
This Court in Cefalo v. … relief was granted in Fry v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2013
S(a); see Ashcroft v. lqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 493 (D.D.c. 1977). Plaintiff is a Kansas state prisoner incarcerated in Lansing, Kansas.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna