Case law

Sparling v. Marzall

109 F. Supp. 922 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 14, 1953

A reddish-brown sirupy balsam * * * used as a stomachic and expectorant, and in the treatment of ulcers, etc. * * Webster’s New International Dictionary, (1926 ed.) . … Standard Oil Development Co. v. Marzall, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 210 , 181 F.2d 280 .

Alton & Southern Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Maintenance Way Employes

928 F. Supp. 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 28, 1996

Railway Labor Executives Ass’n v. National Meditation Board, 29 F.3d 655, 668 (D.C.Cir.1994), amended, 38 F.3d 1224 (D.C.Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1392 , 131 L.Ed.2d 243 (1995). … In IAM v.

Commonwealth v. S. Bay Mental Health Ctr., Inc.

334 F. Supp. 3d 394 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 21, 2018

Growth. 1 The Board of Directors of C.I.S. … City of Burbank v.

Washington Legal Foundation v. Friedman

13 F. Supp. 2d 51 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 1998

See, e.g., Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 603 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. … Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v.

In re Certain Carriers, Represented by the Eastern, Western & Southeastern Carriers' Conference Committees

247 F. Supp. 176 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 12, 1965

Whatever construction is placed upon the Award by the Arbitration Board is necessarily binding on this Court. The question presented on this motion has been submitted to the Arbitration Board. … Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Ry.

Schwartz v. Secretary of the Treasury

364 F. Supp. 344 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 5, 1973

Polcover v. Secretary of the Treasury, 477 F.2d 1223, 1226, 1227 (D.C.Cir. 1973); see, e. g., Moore v. Administrator, 475 F.2d 1283 (D.C.Cir. 1973); Adams v. … When plaintiff appealed to the Civil Service Commission Board of Appeals and Review, the Board concluded: “With regard to the merits of the case, basically, the question is one of credibility .... .

Moran v. Schlosberg

90 F.2d 408 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 5, 1937

In Hurdle v. … See also: Curtis v. Connly, 257 U.S. 260 , 42 S.Ct. 100 , 66 L. Ed. 222 ; Hayden v. Thompson (C.C.A.) 71 F. 60 .

Knight v. Irs

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 2, 2026

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678- 79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Notably, “[a] confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.” Cheeks v. Fort Myer Constr.

K.Y. v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 16, 2026

Brown v. District of Columbia, 928 F.3d 1070, 1081 (D.C. Cir. 2019). … Brown, 928 F.3d at 1081. As courts in this District have recognized, “due process claims may be difficult to resolve through classwide proceedings.” C.G.B. v. Wolf, 464 F.

Banks v. Food and Drug Administration

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 17, 2012

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tz`sch, 656 F. Supp. 23 7, 239 (D.D.C. l987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977). lt appears thzffhe plaintiff has been prescribed the drug risperidal, and he complains of its side effects.

Mallgren v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2026

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff’s allegations are neither clear nor direct, see Fed. R. Civ. … Corp. v.

Pfeiffer v. Central Intelligence Agency

721 F. Supp. 337 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 1989

Shortly before his retirement, plaintiff submitted a purportedly “unclassified” version of the Internal Investigation Report to the CIA’s Publication Review Board (Board) for prepublication review. … Dudman Communications Corp. v. Department of the Air Force, 815 F.2d 1565 (D.C.Cir.1987); Russell v.

Stevens v. Summerfield

151 F. Supp. 343 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 25, 1957

Plaintiffs rely upon the decision in American Civil Liberties Union v. … Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 91 L.Ed. 711 . . People v. State of Illinois ex rel. McCollum v. Board of Education, 333 U.S. 203 , 68 S.Ct. 461 , 92 L.Ed. 648 .

Chen v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 8, 2025

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Notably, “[a] confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.” Cheeks v. Fort Myer Constr.

Hall v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 15, 2019

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Exhibit 7 is a June 23, 2016 Merit Systems Protection Board decision regarding whether Plaintiff was misled about his rights under ¶ 1(g). (Pl.’s Mot. Not to Dismiss Ex. 7.)

Southeast Conference v. Schaefer

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 17, 2010

average of 267 million board feet annually. … V.

Amaplat Mauritius Ltd. v. Zimbabwe Mining Development Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 9, 2024

Rubin v. … . ¶ 4.1 (“[T]he President now has a close control on [Board] appointments.”).

Misu v. United States of America

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 2, 2009

See Haz`nes v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the F ederal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tz`sch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977). The complaint sets forth no factual allegations of any kind, and the Court cannot nd determine the basis of her claims.

Pleasants v. Allbaugh

185 F. Supp. 2d 69 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 2002

Jarrell v. United States Postal Serv., 758 F.2d 1088 , 1091 (D.C.Cir.1985)(citing Brown v. Gen. Services Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976)). … Board of Supervisors of LSU, 715 F.2d 971 (5th Cir.1983), to be controlling: (1) Do the alleged acts involve the same type of discrimination, tending to connect them in a continuing violation?

Manga v. U.S. Small Business Administration

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2025

“Pursuant to th[ese] regulation[s], the Merit Board itself, not this Court, is the appropriate forum. This Court has no authority to enforce such orders.” Lodge v. U.S. … See Wilder v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., No. 09-cv-00615, 2009 WL 935813, at *1 (D.D.C. Apr. 2, 2009) (quoting Arakawa v. Reagan, 666 F. Supp. 254, 257 (D.D.C. 1987)).