Case law

Miller v. U.S. Department of Justice

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 25, 2023

Brown v. … See Shoshone– Bannock Tribes v. Reno, 56 F.3d 1476, 1480 (D.C. Cir. 1995); see also Cox v. Sec'y of Labor, 739 F. Supp. 28, 30 (D.D.C. 1990) (citing cases).

West v. Geithner

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 16, 2009

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519,520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). Under its caption, the complaint in its entirety states, "Fruad [sic] and False Statement Against the United States." CompI. at 1.

Bunyon v. Henderson

206 F. Supp. 2d 28 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 2002

Sept.28, 2001); Childers v. Slater, 44 F.Supp.2d 8, 18 (D.D.C.1999), vacated in part on other grounds, 197 F.R.D. 185, 191 (D.D.C.2000). See Brown v. … Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 . See also Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742, 761 , 118 S.Ct. 2257 , 141 L.Ed.2d 633 (1998).

Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Trade Exchange Network Ltd.

159 F. Supp. 3d 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 9, 2015

Cobell v. … See Brown v. Pro Football, 889 F.Supp. 905 , 913 (D.D.C.1993) (“A Michelangelo should not charge Sistine Chapel rates for painting a fanner’s barn.” (quoting Ursic v. Bethlehem Mines, 719 F.2d 670, 677 (3d Cir.1983))).

Colbert v. Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless, The

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 28, 2010

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Pinson v. U.S. Department of Justice

177 F. Supp. 3d 474 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 8, 2016

(quoting Young v. Lane, 922 F.2d 370, 373 (7th Cir.1991)). Like Mr. Pinson, in Brown v. … See Brown v. F.B.I, 793 F. Supp. 2d 368, 383 (D.D.C. 2011). Several weeks after filing his preliminary injunction motion, the plaintiff was transferred to a different prison. See id. at 372–73.

Phillips v. Distict of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 16, 2011

S(a); see Ashcrofl‘ v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Cz`ralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977). Plaintiff is a homeless individual suing the District of Columbia for $l billion.

Everett v. United States Department of Justice

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 18, 2015

On January 2, 2015, Defendants the Durham County Board of Elections, the County of Durham, and Michael D. … Action Network, Inc. v. Cater Am., LLC, 983 F. Supp. 2d 112, 118 (D.D.C. 2013) (quoting Reuber v. United States, 750 F.2d 1039, 1052 (D.C. Cir. 1984)); United States v. Philip Morris, Inc., 116 F.

United States v. Neill

964 F. Supp. 438 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 1, 1997

United States v. Butler, 924 F.2d 1124, 1127 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 871 , 112 S.Ct. 205 , 116 L.Ed.2d 164 (1991); see United States v. … Brown, 16 F.3d at 428 ; United States v. Brooks, 957 F.2d 1138 , 1145 n. 7 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1228 , 112 S.Ct. 3051 , 120 L.Ed.2d 917 (1992).

Nigerians in Diaspora Organization Americas v. Key

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 17, 2021

See United States v. Ziegler Bolt & Parts Co., 111 F.3d 878, 881 (Fed. … See Morrissey v. Mayorkas, --- F.4th ---, 2021 WL 5183277, at *5 (D.C.

Ballard v. Disbrow

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 9, 2022

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). i. … (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e); citing Brown v. Sec’y of the U.S. Army, 859 F. App’x 901, 901 (11th Cir. 2021) (per curiam)).

United States ex rel. Botany Worsted Mills v. Helvering

89 F.2d 848 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 1937

In United States v. … And on such review the Board acts not as a court but as an administrative agency, and neither this court nor any other court has any jurisdiction to review the discretion of the Commissioner. Williamsport v.

Boyd v. Quigg

698 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 25, 1988

of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) of the PTO. … Zenith Radio Corp. v. Ladd, 310 F.2d 859, 862 (D.C.Cir.1962).

Flaherty v. Pritzker

322 F.R.D. 44 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 21, 2017

Miles & Co., Inc. v. Brown, 910 F. Supp. 1138, 1157 (E.D. … See, e.g., Anglers Conservation Network v. Pritzker, 70 F. Supp. 3d 427, 437 (D.D.C. 2014); J. H. Miles & Co., Inc. v. Brown, 910 F. Supp. 1138, 1159 (E.D. Va. 1995).

Petition for Naturalization of Meng Chung Yang

171 F. Supp. 898 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 13, 1959

A letter from this college in the visa file, dated April 2, 1957, states that the subject had been granted a full four-year scholarship covering room, board and tuition. … The case is somewhat analogous to the situation in McGrath v. Kristensen, 1950, 340 U.S. 162, 172 , 71 S.Ct. 224 , 95 L.Ed. 173 . Petition granted.

Gilliard v. Bb&t Bank

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 14, 2025

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Notably, “[a] confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.” Cheeks v. Fort Myer Constr.

Garner v. Rice

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 22, 2009

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237,239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Bell v. Jw Marriott Hotel

District Court, District of Columbia · May 6, 2009

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff alleges that, on February 14, 2009, "security decided to bar [her] out of the JW /JJ) Marriot Hotel." Compl. at 1.

Trazell I v. Espinto LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 23, 2015

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 US. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralskjy v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (DC. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, has submitted a “Civil Complaint in Chancery” against a business in the District of Columbia.

American Viscose Corp. v. Coe

106 F.2d 849 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 1939

This ruling was affirmed by the Board of Appeals in respect of the new matter and of the estoppel but not. in respect of indefiniteness, the Board holding that the offered claims 10'.and 11 sufficiently corrected the indefiniteness … Pont de Nemours &, Co. v. Coe, 1937; 67 App.D.C. 42 , 89 F.2d 679 , International Cellucotton Products Co. v.