Case law

Semiani v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 2014

S(a); see Ashcrof v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Cz'ralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661 , 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Callfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff is a resident of Algeria suing the United States.

Cort v. Herter

187 F. Supp. 683 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 11, 1960

His draft board in Brookline,. … Co. of *686 Hartford, Conn. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227, 239-241, 244 , 57 S.Ct. 461 , 81 L.Ed. 617 ; Perkins v. Elg, 69 App.D.C. 175 , 99 F.2d 408 , affirmed 307 U.S. 325 , 59 S.Ct. 884 , 83 L.Ed. 1320 ; Tom Mung Ngow v.

Wagner v. United States Solicitor General

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 19, 2023

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). 1  As drafted, plaintiff’s complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading standard set forth in Rule 8(a). … See Otero v. U.S. Attorney General, 832 F.2d 141, 141–42 (11th Cir. 1987); see also Jafree v. Barber, 689 F.2d 640, 643 (7th Cir. 1982).

Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.

50 F.R.D. 249 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 1970

Richards v. Maine Central R., 21 F.R.D. 590 (D.C.Me.1957). … Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 , 67 S.Ct. 385 , 91 L.Ed. 451 (1947). IV. Good cause has not been shown for the production of either set of reports. Martin v.

Hipes v. State of California

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 29, 2011

See Haines v. Kerrzer, 404 U.S. 5l9, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tz`sch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Calzfarzo, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). lt appears that plaintiffs claims arise from the placement of his grandchildren in foster care by state officials in Califomia.

Willis v. Vilsack

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 31, 2011

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237,239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Williams v. Burnet

59 F.2d 357 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 23, 1932

See Simmons Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C. C. A.) 33 F.(2d) 75 . It has been held by this court in Hutchings v. … The decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals are accordingly affirmed. Affirmed.

Reddick v. Department of Defense

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 30, 2010

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Evenpro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiffs complaint does not contain a short and plain statement of a claim that plaintiff N is entitled to the relief he seeks.

Garza v. Blinken

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2023

Circuit re- defined what constitutes an “adverse employment action” for purposes of Title VII discrimination claims, overturning the “objectively tangible harm” requirement articulated in Brown v. … Brown, 199 F.3d at 457.

Wu v. Stomber

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 4, 2013

Niedermeier v. Office of Max S. Baucus, 153 F. Supp. 2d 23, 28 (D.D.C. 2001), citing Anyanwutaku v. Moore, 151 F.3d 1053, 1057 (D.C. Cir. 1998). … See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002); Kowal v. MCI Commc’n Corp., 16 F.3d 1271, 1276 (D.C. Cir. 1994).

Weekes v. Dc Police

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2013

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tz`sch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. l987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). As drafted, plaintiffs pleading fails to accomplish even these minimal goals.

Kolinske v. Lubbers

516 F. Supp. 1171 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 22, 1981

Sipes, 386 U.S. 171, 182 , 87 S.Ct. 903, 912 , 17 L.Ed.2d 842 (“the Board’s General Counsel has unreviewable discretion to refuse to institute an unfair labor practice complaint.”); Bandlow v. … Additionally, district courts have exercised jurisdiction over actions by the Board which infringe constitutional rights. Fay v. Douds, 172 F.2d 720, 723 (2d Cir. 1949) (Hand, J.)

Nigerians in Diaspora Organization Americas v. Key

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 17, 2021

See United States v. Ziegler Bolt & Parts Co., 111 F.3d 878, 881 (Fed. … See Morrissey v. Mayorkas, --- F.4th ---, 2021 WL 5183277, at *5 (D.C.

Klayman v. Obama

142 F. Supp. 3d 172 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 9, 2015

Id. at 562-63 (Brown, J.); see also id. at 565 (Williams, J.) … See Klayman, 800 F.3d at 566 (Brown, J.)

Moore v. Department of Justice

935 F. Supp. 2d 30 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2013

Rochon, 483 F.3d at 1214 (citing Hansson v. Norton, 411 F.3d 231, 232 (D.C. Cir. 2005) and Brown v. United States, 389 F.3d 1296, 1297 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (per curiam)). … In Brown, the plaintiff also sought damages. 389 F.3d at 1297.

George v. Capital Traction Co.

295 F. 965 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 5, 1924

Murray v. Washington & Georgetown Railroad Co., 2 MacArthur, 195 ; Pringle v. Guild et al. (C. C.) 119 Fed. 962, 964 . … Kelly v. Jackson, 6 Pet. 622, 631 , 8 L. Ed. 523 .

Walsh v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, Na

75 F. Supp. 3d 256 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 4, 2014

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Simpson v. Cleland, 640 F.2d 1354, 1360 (D.C. Cir. 1981), quoting Roberts v. Cameron-Brown Co., 556 F.2d 356, 361 (5th Cir. 1977).

Buckeye Production Credit, Ass'n v. United States

792 F. Supp. 827 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 17, 1990

Ass’n v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 , 103 S.Ct. 2856, 2866 , 77 L.Ed.2d 443 (1983) (quoting, Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. … Kreis v. Secretary of the Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1514 (D.C.Cir.1989).

Peevy v. Donahue

846 F. Supp. 2d 130 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 6, 2012

Weaver v. … Elinor Brown, ECF No. 16, ¶ 4, and plaintiff does not rebut this assertion.

Davis v. Obama

District Court, District of Columbia · May 10, 2013

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se 1itigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tz`sch, 656 F. Supp. 23 7, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff generally complains of the actions and policies of the President of the United States and his administration.