Case law

Abebio v. G4s Government Solutions, Inc.

72 F. Supp. 3d 254 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 4, 2014

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Miles v. Univ. of D.C., No. 12-378(RBW), 2013 WL 5817657, at *13 (D.D.C. Oct. 30, 2013), quoting Brown v. District of Columbia, 919 F. Supp. 2d 105, 115 (D.D.C. 2013).

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Lawrence

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 2022

Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987) (citing Redwood v. Council of the District of Columbia, 679 F.2d 931 (D.C. Cir. 1982); Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972)). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977) (citation omitted). Sun’s Complaint does not meet the Rule 8 pleading standard.

East Texas Medical Center Athens v. Price

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 18, 2018

seek a review of that determination by the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (the “Board” or 6 “PRRB”), 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(a)(1)(A)(ii), see also Dignity Health v. … In Banner Health v.

B & G INVESTMENT PARTNERS LP CORP. v. Thompson

391 F. Supp. 2d 246 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2005

The Court finds that the Board’s consideration and interpretation of the Prospectus is reasonable and supported by the record. See Consolo v. Fed. Mar. … See, e.g., DSE, Inc. v.

Spencer v. Greyhound Bus Lines, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · May 9, 2023

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division v. Southern Air, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2020

The Southern System Board of Adjustment (“Southern Board”) granted the Southern grievance in June 2019, Southern Award 24, and the Atlas System Board of Adjustment (“Atlas Board”) granted the Atlas grievance in August 2019 … Bus. v.

Johnson v. Denver Gen Dist Court

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2013

See Haz'nes v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 5l9, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the F ederal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 23 7, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Al-Zahrani v. Rumsfeld

684 F. Supp. 2d 103 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 16, 2010

Administrative Review Boards (“ARBs”) were convened in 2005 and 2006 to review Al-Zahrani’s and Al-Salami’s detentions and after a hearing, the ARBs affirmed the conclusions of the CRSTs. (Id. ¶¶ 86, 129.) … Id. at 221-22 , 70 S.Ct. 10 (citing Vermilya-Brown, Co. v.

Julius v. Nemadii Research Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 14, 2012

See Haz`nes v. Kerrzer, 404 U.S. 5l9, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tz`sch, 656 F. Supp. 23 7, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). As is the case with plaintiff’s prior complaints, the pleading utterly fails to meet Rule S(a)’s minimal pleading standard.

Elzie v. Aspin

897 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 14, 1995

Even with the restricted First Amendment protections in the military, see, e.g., Brown v. … R.A.V v. City of St.

Hyatt v. Matal

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 1, 2018

v. … V. Barr Labs., Inc., 625 F.3d 724, 728 (Fed.

Alford v. Koses

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 7, 2023

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Still, pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The standard also assists the court in determining whether it has jurisdiction over the subject matter.

Tucker v. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia · May 9, 2025

Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 669 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (cleaned up). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Savannah Heights Limited Partnership v. District of Columbia Housing Authority

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 4, 2021

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint “must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” … Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1024 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (quoting Tsintolas Realty Co. v. Mendez, 984 A.2d 181, 187 (D.C. 2009)).

Houston v. Andrea

District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 2014

S(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ci`ralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 66l, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Calrfano, 75 F.R.D. 497,493(1).1).<:_ 1977). Plaintiff is a prisoner at the United States Penitentiary in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.

Marron v. City of Chesapeake Corporate Entity

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 10, 2013

S(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F,R.D. 497, 493 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff is incarcerated at the Lawrenceville Correctional Center in Virginia.

Milner v. United States Supreme Court

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 20, 2018

Navegar, Inc. v. United States, 103 F.3d 994, 998 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (quoting Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560–61 (1992)). … Date: December 20, 2018 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

United States v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

455 F. Supp. 1072 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 1978

C. v. Browning, 140 U.S.App. … C. v. Browning, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 292, 294-296 , 435 F.2d 96, 98-100 (1970).

Adair v. England

209 F.R.D. 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 19, 2002

Adair v. England, 183 F.Supp.2d 31 (D.D.C.2002). … ; the Navy’s practice of allowing the Chief of Chaplains to determine the makeup of a promotion board or a [Selective Early Retirement Board (“SERB”)]; the Navy’s policy of identifying the faith group of each chaplain to

Burley v. United States Government

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 29, 2011

v, ) Civil Action N0. 1 ) UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter comes before the Court upon review of plaintiff s three pro se complaints and applications for leave to proceed in forma … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977). Plaintiff alleges fraud, conspiracy and corruption on the part of government officials, including the President of the United States.