Case law

Mitchell v. Tillerson

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2019

Taylor v. … DATE: March 31, 2019 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Henderson v. Office of the Director of National Intelligence

151 F. Supp. 3d 170 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 2016

Mayer Brown, 562 F.3d at 1193. … Mayer Brown, 562 F.3d at 1193.

Department of Medical Assistance Services of the Commonwealth of Virginia v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2018

Cir. 1984). l thus review questions of law and fact together for whether or not the Board’s decision was reasonable. framework set out in Chevron U.S.A., [nc. v. … Drake v. FAA, 291 F.3d 59, 68 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing Bowles v.

B & G INVESTMENT PARTNERS LP CORP. v. Thompson

391 F. Supp. 2d 246 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2005

The Court finds that the Board’s consideration and interpretation of the Prospectus is reasonable and supported by the record. See Consolo v. Fed. Mar. … See, e.g., DSE, Inc. v.

Brosten v. Library of Congress

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2014

S(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Cz'ralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Calz`fano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff is a District of Columbia resident suing the Library of Congress for allegedly limiting his access presumably to the building. See Compl. at 2.

Ward v. Vogel

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 20, 2014

See Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21, 25 (1991) (“Personal-capacity suits . . . seek to impose individual liability upon a government officer for actions taken under color of state law.”); Brown v. Wilhelm, 819 F. … Pollard v. District of Columbia, 285 F.R.D. 125, 127 (D.D.C. 2012) (quoting Mann v. Castiel, 729 F. Supp. 2d 191, 196 (D.D.C. 2010)).

Koorkanian v. Schultz

651 F. Supp. 1268 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 16, 1987

Reiner v. United States, 686 F.2d 1017, 1026 (D.C.Cir.1982) (Wilkey, J. concurring). See also, Ehrman v. United States, No. 82-1984, slip op. at 3 (D.D.C., August 31, 1983). … In 1984, seven boards were reconstituted in connection with four cases; in 1985, three boards in connection with eight cases; and in 1986, three boards in connection with five cases. Exhibit 1 at'2, Def.

Freeman v. Pew

59 F.2d 1037 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 13, 1932

But we think to follow this line of reasoning would be to add to the confusion which now exists, and therefore we prefer to adhere to the rule long ago announced by ns in Ambrose v. Brown, 42 App. D. … In Burnet v. Willingham L. & T. Co., 282 U. S. 437, 439 , 51 S. Ct. 185, 186 , 75 L. Ed. 448 , Mr.

Burley v. United States Government

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 29, 2011

v, ) Civil Action N0. 1 ) UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter comes before the Court upon review of plaintiff s three pro se complaints and applications for leave to proceed in forma … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977). Plaintiff alleges fraud, conspiracy and corruption on the part of government officials, including the President of the United States.

Alaska Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. Baldrige

541 F. Supp. 770 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 1982

In so doing, the Court may not substitute its judgment for that of the Board. Rather, the Court may only decide whether the Board made a clear error of judgment. See United States Lines, Inc. v. … American Maritime Association v. Stans, 329 F.Supp. at 1186 . *775 V.

Tucker v. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia · May 9, 2025

Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 669 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (cleaned up). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Leopold v. Manger

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 10, 2026

v. … Plaintiff’s view of the extent of the Capitol Police Board’s authority is generally correct.

West v. Gaithes

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 10, 2010

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661,668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). In pleading fraud or mistake, "a party must state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake." Fed. R. Civ.

McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission

893 F. Supp. 2d 133 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2012

Before: BROWN, Circuit Judge; WILKINS, District Judge; and BOASBERG, District Judge. … Ass’n v. Fed.

Michelin v. Jenkins

704 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 6, 1989

Further, the Board of Education is not a legal entity, and therefore it is not subject to suit. Miller v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia, 106 F.Supp. 988, 989 (D.D.C.1952). III. … Plaintiff’s First Amendment claim is governed by Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968) and its progeny.

Smith v. Nbc New Univision

District Court, District of Columbia · May 11, 2012

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even prose litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237,239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Blackman v. District of Columbia

59 F. Supp. 2d 37 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 9, 1999

See Maher v. … See Hewitt v.

Connor v. People of the City

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 6, 2010

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661,668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977).  Plaintiff, who apparently is homeless, has submitted a lengthy un-paginated narrative that identifies no particular defendant and states no cognizable claim.

Advertisers Distribution Services v. United States Postal Service

526 F. Supp. 699 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 1981

Plaintiffs have failed to meet the requirements for granting injunctive relief under Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. … The Board of Governors’ action complied with the notice provision set forth in 39 U.S.C. § 3641 (a).

Blackman v. District of Columbia

277 F. Supp. 2d 89 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 22, 2003

See Schneider v. … Industry Association v.