Case law

United States v. Bodye

172 F. Supp. 3d 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 2016

Morrison v. … Gonzales v.

Morley v. United States Central Intelligence Agency

828 F. Supp. 2d 257 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 15, 2011

Cotton, 63 F.3d at 1120 (quoting Fenster v. Brown, 617 F.2d 740, 744 (D.C. Cir. 1979). … State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Indep. Sch.

United States v. Sutton

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2022

Hylton-Brown, for purposes of establishing whether he acted with a “malice” so as to have committed second degree murder, see United States v. … Hylton- Brown on October 23, 2020.” United States v. Sutton, 2022 WL 2828995, at *3. Mr.

Spencer v. Internal Revenue Service

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 14, 2023

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v.

EQUAL RIGHTS CENTER v. District of Columbia

741 F. Supp. 2d 273 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 5, 2010

Lottery through the District of Columbia Lottery and Charitable Games Control Board (“the Board”), of which Defendant Buddy Roogow is Executive Director. … In Scott v.

Smith v. Nbc New Univision

District Court, District of Columbia · May 11, 2012

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even prose litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237,239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Freeman v. Pew

59 F.2d 1037 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 13, 1932

But we think to follow this line of reasoning would be to add to the confusion which now exists, and therefore we prefer to adhere to the rule long ago announced by ns in Ambrose v. Brown, 42 App. D. … In Burnet v. Willingham L. & T. Co., 282 U. S. 437, 439 , 51 S. Ct. 185, 186 , 75 L. Ed. 448 , Mr.

Dammarell v. Islamic Republic of Iran

404 F. Supp. 2d 261 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 14, 2005

(iii) Kristen (Ames) Brown Kristen Brown is the daughter and third child of Robert and Yvonne Ames. See Tr. Vol. V at 42; Ex. 48. In April of 1983, Ms. … After talking with a friend from boarding school and college who had experienced similar family loss, Ms.

Long v. Sebelius

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2010

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. l937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 66l, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff, a resident of Oxon Hill, Maryland, sues the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

Long v. Locke

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 20, 2010

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661,668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). /' /)')  Plaintiff, a resident of Oxon Hill, Maryland, sues the Secretary of Commerce.

Environmental Integrity Project v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

177 F. Supp. 3d 36 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2016

Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 290 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979), not all requests for records must be honored, as FOIA also provides “exemptions from compelled disclosure, They are nine in number and are set forth in § 552 … See Asiana Airlines v. FAA, 134 F.3d 393 , 398 (D.C.Cir.1998); Maxwell v.

Hickman v. United States Mint

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 2009

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DERIAN DOUGLAS HICKMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Davis v. Filip

596 F. Supp. 2d 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2009

The Screening Panel transmitted its recommendations to the Special Agent Mid-Level Management Selection Board (the “SAMMS Board”), “a selection board staffed by high-level management officials of the FBI.” Id. ¶ 12. … Williams v. Savage, 569 F.Supp.2d 99, 108 (D.D.C.2008).

Mitchell v. Tillerson

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2019

Taylor v. … DATE: March 31, 2019 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Henderson v. Office of the Director of National Intelligence

151 F. Supp. 3d 170 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 2016

Mayer Brown, 562 F.3d at 1193. … Mayer Brown, 562 F.3d at 1193.

Smith v. Harvey

541 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 2008

Although Smith was given notice that she was being considered for involuntary separation and was given the option of appearing before a separation board (see id. at 5), she has declined to appear before the separation board … See Wilhelm v. Caldera, 90 F.Supp.2d 3, 8-9 (D.D.C.2000) (citing Guerra v.

Michelin v. Jenkins

704 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 6, 1989

Further, the Board of Education is not a legal entity, and therefore it is not subject to suit. Miller v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia, 106 F.Supp. 988, 989 (D.D.C.1952). III. … Plaintiff’s First Amendment claim is governed by Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968) and its progeny.

Julius v. Social Security Administration

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 2009

DISTRICT COURT TYRONE JULIUS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Montgomery v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

601 F. Supp. 2d 139 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2009

See Holt v. … Cohen v.

Berry v. McCarthy

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 22, 2018

BERRY, Plaintiff, v. … See, e.g., Saint-Fleur v. McHugh, 4 83 F. Supp. 3d 149, 157 (D.D.C. 2015).