Case law

Ciriello v. Executive Office of the President

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 17, 2014

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668—71 (DC. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff is a resident of Waterbury, Connecticut, who has named the Executive Office of the President as the sole defendant to this action. See Compl. Caption.

Hickman v. United States Mint

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 2009

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DERIAN DOUGLAS HICKMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Barker v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 6, 2019

The second level of review is the TSGLI Appeals Board Navy Council of Review Boards (the “CORB”). Id. The third level of review is the Board for Correction of Naval Records (the “BCNR” or “Board”). Id. B. … Rich v. United States, 369 F. Supp. 3d 263, 274 (D.D.C. 2019). For example, in Fail v.

Queen City Brewing Co. v. District of Columbia

134 F.2d 44 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 8, 1943

Riley v. West Union Tel. Co., 47 Ind. 511 ; State Board of Tax Com’rs v. Holliday, 150 Ind. 216 , 49 N.E. 14 , 42 L.R.A. 826 . … Ct. v. Western Md. R. Co., 50 Md. 274 ; Board of Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. Ryan, 107 Okl. 274 , 232 P. 834 . We can find nothing in Johnson Oil Refining Co. v.

McBride v. Coe

50 F. Supp. 286 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 4, 1943

McBride v. Teeple, 27 C.C.P.A., Patents, 961, 109 F.2d 789, 798 . … The Board of Appeals again awarded priority of invention to Teeple and that decision was affirmed by the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals on June 1, 1942. McBride v. Teeple, 129 F.2d 328 , 29 C.C.P.A., Patents, 1084.

Appleby v. Harvey

517 F. Supp. 2d 253 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 29, 2007

As the District of Columbia Circuit has recognized, the final decisions of military correction boards are reviewed under “an unusually deferential application of the ‘arbitrary and capricious’ standard.” Kreis v. … Presumably, the defendant is referring to the wealth of case law “entrusting the primary duty of the correction] of military records with the military corrections boards.” See Harris v.

Overby v. NATIONAL ASS'N OF LETTER CARRIERS

601 F. Supp. 2d 101 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2009

Board of Trustees, must then be approved by the NALC Executive Council. … See Wagener v.

Smiths America Corp. v. Bendix Aviation Corp.

140 F. Supp. 46 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 17, 1956

confine of policy laid down by the parent board of Smith. … For a further general treatment of the problem of political questions, cf. also Vermilya-Brown Co. v.

Julius v. Branch Metro Bus Train

District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2012

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519,520 (1972). Even prose litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Berg v. Commissioner

33 F.2d 641 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 1929

W. 958 ; Boeing v. Owsley, 122 Minn. 190 , 142 N. W. 129 , and State v. Royal Mineral Ass’n, 132 Minn. 232 , 156 N. W. 128 , Ann. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed, with costs.

Local Union No. 639, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Inc. v. Jacobs Transfer Co.

407 F. Supp. 125 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 1976

United Steelworkers v. American Mfg. Co., 363 U.S. 564 , 80 S.Ct. 1343 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1403 (1960); United Steelworkers v. … If this is done, the new order would supersede the arbitration awards, since “ . . the superior authority of the Board may be invoked at any time”. Carey v.

In Re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

270 F. Supp. 2d 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2003

Co. v. … Institute v.

Ladson v. George Washington University

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 1, 2016

See Wilkins v. Jackson, 750 F. … .”); Sykes v. Dudas, 573 F.

Henok v. Chase Home Finance, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 28, 2015

See Araya v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 13-7036, 2014 WL 7373492 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 30, 2014). … No. 111-1 in Civil Action No. 12-0336] — specifically, Shapiro, Brown & Alt LLP (formerly Shapiro & Burson, LLP); Gregory Britto; John Burson; or Fannie Mae — wishes to submit views on the question of this Court’s jurisdiction

Wright v. U.S. Labor workforce/national Security

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 2014

P, S(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 66l, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Calq`fano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The plaintiff is a resident of Memphis, Tennessee.

Long v. Salazar

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2010

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661,668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). ,J/ ./  Plaintiff, a resident of Ox on Hill, Maryland, sues the Secretary of the Interior.

Long v. Linkow

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 26, 2010

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937,1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661,668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.RD. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Anderson v. United States Department of Defense

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2026

Id., Part V, §§ 502–06. If the MEB determines that the member’s condition does not meet standards to be retained in active duty, the MEB can refer the member’s case to a Physical Evaluation Board. Id. § 506(c). … See Roberts v. Harvey, 441 F.

Alma v. Bowser

159 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 9, 2016

Will v. Mich. Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 71 (1989); see also Kentucky v. … DATE: February 9, 2016 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

United States Association of Reptile Keepers, Inc. v. Jewell

106 F. Supp. 3d 125 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 2015

See Third Goss Decl. ¶ 6; Clark Deck. ¶ 7; Second Declaration of Kristopher Brown (Dkt. 53-3) ¶¶ 4-7. … Second Brown Decl. ¶ 7.