Case law

Fisher v. Fulwood

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2011

I, § 9, cl. 3; Collins v. Youngblood, 497 U.S. 37,42-43 (1990)). … (quoting Garner v.

Spine v. Biedermann Motech Gmbh

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 15, 2010

Estee Lauder Inc. v. L’Oreal, S.A., 129 F.3d 588, 592 (Fed. Cir. 1997). “Questions of law are reviewed de novo, but the underlying factual determinations made by the Board are reviewed for clear error.” … An action brought under § 146 is essentially a proceeding to review the action of the Board. Conservolite, Inc. v. Widmayer, 21 F.3d 1098, 1102 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

Julius v. Branch Metro Bus Train

District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2012

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519,520 (1972). Even prose litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Julius v. McKinnon

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2010

BankruptcY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Courts for the District of Columbia TYRONE JULIUS, Plaintiff, ) v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff alleges that the name on his SmarTrip card, apparently issued by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, is not his name.

Rushing v. America

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 12, 2021

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The Plaintiff alleges that he forwarded a complaint and lawsuit to then-President Donald Trump, but that no rebuttal was offered. Compl. at 1.

D'amore v. Small Business Administration

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 2024

TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 594 U.S. 413, 423 (2021); see also Lujan v. … See, e.g., Laufer v.

Simpson Ex Rel. Estate of Karim v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya

529 F. Supp. 2d 80 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 2008

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren, 353 F.3d at 39; Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 .

In Re Search of the Rayburn House Office Building Room Number 2113

432 F. Supp. 2d 100 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 10, 2006

See Brown & Williamson, 62 F.3d at 416 (legislative privileges and immunities designed to prevent intimidation by the executive and accountability before a possibly hostile judiciary) (quoting United States v. … In Brown & Williamson, the D.C.

Williamson v. Clinton

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 23, 2012

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even prose litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Bradley v. Pevlar

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 2023

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). It appears that plaintiff, a resident of Capac, Michigan, is the guardian of a minor on whose behalf he manages the proceeds of a settlement.

Long v. Salazar

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2010

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661,668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). ,J/ ./  Plaintiff, a resident of Ox on Hill, Maryland, sues the Secretary of the Interior.

Colbert v. Turri

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 7, 2010

Greene v. Dalton, 164 F.3d 671, 675 (D.C. Cir. 1999); Harding v. Gray, 9 F.3d 150, 154 (D.C. Cir. 1993). … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999).

Arnold v. Dejoy

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 23, 2025

at 413)); Brown v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 164 F. … Hamrick v. United States, No. 10-CV-857, 2010 WL 3324721, at *1 (D.D.C. Aug. 24, 2010) (internal quotation marks omitted); see Brown, 164 F. Supp. 3d at 35. III.

Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Dole

631 F. Supp. 1345 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 1, 1986

See Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Dole, 723 F.2d 975, 979 (D.C.Cir.1983). … American President Lines v. Federal Maritime Board, 112 F.Supp. 346, 348 (D.D.C.1953); Moore- *1350 McCormack Lines, Inc. v. United States, 413 F.2d 568, 580-82 (Ct.Cl.1969).

Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police v. Ashcroft

185 F. Supp. 2d 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 14, 2001

Scolaro v. D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics, 104 F.Supp.2d 18, 22 (D.D.C.2000) (citing Herbert v. Nat’l Academy of Sciences, 974 F.2d 192, 197 (D.C.Cir.1992)); see also Haase v. … See, e.g., United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 552 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996).

Thompson v. Washington Mutual

District Court, District of Columbia · May 26, 2010

Columbia. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Case Management Conference scheduled for May 25, 5 2010 is CONTINUED to July 13, 2010. 6 Dated: 5/24/10 7 PATRICIA V. … 4 Henderson, NV 89009 5 Aster Kifle-Thompson Post Office Box 92214 6 Henderson, NV 89009 7 /s/ Donna Kirchner for 8 MARTHA BROWN

Berenter v. Quigg

737 F. Supp. 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 31, 1988

. § 145 to set aside the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. … The Primary Examiner and the Board concluded that the claim would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 .

Woodyard v. Harper

162 F. Supp. 3d 3 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 2016

In assessing its jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(h)(3), the court “must accept as true all of the factual allegations contained in the complaint[,]” Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Complaints submitted by plaintiffs proceeding pro se are reviewed by the court under “less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.”

Carter, Fullerton & Hayes, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission

637 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 24, 2009

Nat’l Labor Relations Board v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 224 , 98 S.Ct. 2311 , 57 L.Ed.2d 159 (1978). … New Motor Vehicle Board of Cal. v. Orrin W. Fox Co., 439 U.S. 96, 111 , 99 S.Ct. 403 , 58 L.Ed.2d 361 (1978).

Hines v. Department of Transportation

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 24, 2024

Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 669 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (cleaned up). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff, a resident of Buffalo, New York, allegedly had an encounter on June 4, 2024, with an officer of the Cheektowaga, New York police force.