Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

0.41s

  • Andrews v. Greater Southeast Community Hospital

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2012

    <i‘t:rtlg 21a FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CURTIS ANDREWS, ) Plaintiff, § v. § civil A¢rion N@. 043{] GREATER SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY g HOSPITAL, et al. , ) Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977). As drafted, the plaintiff’ s complaint fails to comply with Rule S(a), and it will be dismissed without / prejudice.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Malone v. Clinton

    District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2010

    P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hitachi Koki Co., Ltd. v. Dukas

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 29, 2009

    (See Board’s Decision at 15.) … However, because plaintiff may not raise new issues that were not presented to the Examiner or the Board, see Hyatt v. Dudas, No. 03-CV-0901, 2005 WL 5569663, at *5 (D.D.C. Sept. 30, 2005) (citing DeSeversky v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kinkaid v. McDonald

    208 F. Supp. 3d 212 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2016

    Petitioner requested a Disciplinary Appeals Board (“DAB”) hearing, which was held in December 2012. Id. The DAB upheld five of the charges against petitioner in whole and two in part, and rejected one charge. Id. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Under Rule 12(b)(1), the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence. See Lujan v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Blue

    874 F. Supp. 409 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 1995

    Pinaud v. … United States v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Gales v. District of Columbia

    47 F. Supp. 2d 43 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 27, 1999

    The application described the premises: THREE LEVEL BROWN BRICK DUPLEX HOUSE WITH THE NUMBERS 1101 ABOVE THE FRONT DOOR. … THE FRONT DOOR IS WHITE WITH A PEEPHOLE AND A SILVER MAIL SLOT IN THE DOOR AND THERE IS A BROWN WOODEN STICK IN THE FIRST FLOOR WINDOW.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Rowland v. Cook, Craig & Francuzenko, Pllc

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 2013

    S(a); see Ashcroft v. lqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2()09); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 66l, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977). Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, purports to sue a limited liability corporation in Fairfax, Virginia, for $27 billion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moreno-Baltierra v. United States Health & Human Services

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 2, 2013

    P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2()09); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff purports to sue the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the States of Califomia and Kentucky, or agencies within those states.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dilorenzo v. Norton

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 3, 2009

    "Shareholders ordinarily must make a demand on the company's board of directors in order to bring a derivative suit." Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Med. Benefits Trust v. Raines, 534 F.3d 779,782 (D.C. … Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A.2d 805, 814 (Del. 1984). Alternatively, where the challenged conduct is not a business decision of the board of directors, the RaZes test applies. Wood, 953 A.2d at 140.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sissel v. Esper

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 22, 2021

    See AR 49 (Medical Board Summary, 3 Congress created the PDBR in 2008 to address the disparities in disability ratings issued by the military departments in the DOD and the VA. See Adams v. … Review of Military Decisions Decisions of military correction boards receive an “unusually deferential application of the arbitrary and capricious standard” of the APA. Kreis v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Klayman v. Porter

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 16, 2025

    Id. at 102; see also O’Shea v. … Board on Professional Responsibility. This is especially true considering Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bethesda Health, Inc. v. Alex M Azar II

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 23, 2019

    Nazareth Hosp. v. Sec’y U.S. … /Sunbelt, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ['Patrick-Bey v. U.S. Government']

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2014

    P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 66l, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977). Plaintiff, a resident of Arlington, Virginia, sues the "U.S. Government," but he has made no factual allegations against the United States.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shipman v. Disabled American Veterans

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 9, 2015

    See Haines v. Kerner, 404 US. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (BBC. 1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Martin v. Stone

    759 F. Supp. 19 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 8, 1991

    Hayes v. Secretary of Defense, 515 F.2d 668 (D.C.Cir.1975). … In addition, the plaintiff asserts that resort to the Board should not be required in this case since the Board would simply be revisiting the issues already considered by the Secretary.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Carson v. U.S. Office of Special Counsel

    514 F. Supp. 2d 54 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 2007

    BROida, A Guide To Merit Systems Protection Board Law & PRACTICE, CL 13 § IV.B.1 (2004). … Williams v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • QUIBLEY v. Giblin

    582 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 22, 2008

    Library Ass’n v. Barr, 956 F.2d 1178, 1188-89 (D.C.Cir.1992) (quoting City Council v. Taxpayers for Vincent, 466 U.S. 789, 798 , 104 S.Ct. 2118 , 80 L.Ed.2d 772 (1984), quoted in New York State Club Ass’n v. … Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703, 733 , 120 S.Ct. 2480 , 147 L.Ed.2d 597 (2000) (internal quotation omitted); see also Grayned v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Department of Health and Human Services

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 21, 2023

    Univ. of Am. (2020), https://www.catholic.edu/about-us/leadership/board-of-trustees/bylaws.html; see also Fed. R. Civ. … Supp. 3d 134, 142 (D.D.C. 2016); 11 Ware v. Hyatt Corp., No. 12-cv-0395, 2013 WL 12321372, at *14–15 (D.D.C. Mar. 27, 2013); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Doherty v. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 2021

    Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 150 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (cleaned up). … See, e.g., Brown v. 1301 K St. Ltd.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • De La Cruz v. United States

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 16, 2014

    Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). ‘ Stated briefly, the complaint is unintelligible. … See, e. g., Cofield v. Williams, No. 96-5072, 1997 WL 68271, at *1 (DD. Cir.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.