Case law

In re Zuckert

28 F.R.D. 29 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 25, 1961

a summary of the findings of the Board. … Evans v. United States, D.C., 10 F.R.D. 255 . United Air Lines, Inc. v. United States, D.C., 186 F.Supp. 824 .

Otis & Co. v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.

84 F. Supp. 395 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 6, 1949

thereby, and that application to the Board of Governors for review shall operate as a stay of any such disciplinary action until a decision is rendered by the Board of Governors upon such review. 5 Application for review … Otis & Co. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, et al., D.C.Cir., 176 F.2d 34 , It seems obvious from the record that this is intended to be February 9, 1948. Section 5.

Amin v. Nyack School of Adult and Distance Education

District Court, District of Columbia · May 7, 2010

See Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d at 1276; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). -3-  III. … See Squires v. Brown, 604 F. Supp. 2d 236, 238 (D.D.C. 2009) (citing Park v. Arnott, Civil Action No. 89-3257 (RCL), 1992 WL 184521, *4 (D.D.C. July 14, 1992). Amin has not made such a showing.

Venditto v. Cunningham

322 F. Supp. 3d 254 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2018

Resources Network, Inc. v. Brown & Brown, Inc. , 754 F.Supp.2d 128 , 159 (D. … Laverty v. Massad , 661 F.Supp.2d 55 , 62 (D. Mass. 2009) ; cf. Butler v. Winner Int'l Corp. , 1995 WL 420004 , *4 (4th Cir.

Rushing v. America

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 12, 2021

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The Plaintiff alleges that he forwarded a complaint and lawsuit to then-President Donald Trump, but that no rebuttal was offered. Compl. at 1.

Gales v. District of Columbia

47 F. Supp. 2d 43 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 27, 1999

The application described the premises: THREE LEVEL BROWN BRICK DUPLEX HOUSE WITH THE NUMBERS 1101 ABOVE THE FRONT DOOR. … THE FRONT DOOR IS WHITE WITH A PEEPHOLE AND A SILVER MAIL SLOT IN THE DOOR AND THERE IS A BROWN WOODEN STICK IN THE FIRST FLOOR WINDOW.

Chappell-Johnson v. Bair

636 F. Supp. 2d 135 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 24, 2009

Chappell-Johnson v. Powell, 440 F.3d 484, 488 (D.C.Cir.2006) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). … Holcomb v. Powell, 433 F.3d 889, 902 (D.C.Cir.2006) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C.Cir.1999)). They also ignore Velikonja v.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division v. Southern Air, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2020

The Southern System Board of Adjustment (“Southern Board”) granted the Southern grievance in June 2019, Southern Award 24, and the Atlas System Board of Adjustment (“Atlas Board”) granted the Atlas grievance in August 2019 … Bus. v.

Saiyed v. Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc.

78 F. Supp. 3d 465 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 29, 2015

If the CAIR-VA board would make a decision regarding personnel, including hiring and firing decisions and salary, the board would be presented with the issue and then vote on it. Mr. … Iqbal ran the operations of CAIR-VA as its acting executive director, he did so pursuant to the supervision of CAIR-VA’s volunteer board [and] [h]e was bound to the decisions made by the CAIR-VA volunteer board.”

Martin v. Stone

759 F. Supp. 19 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 8, 1991

Hayes v. Secretary of Defense, 515 F.2d 668 (D.C.Cir.1975). … In addition, the plaintiff asserts that resort to the Board should not be required in this case since the Board would simply be revisiting the issues already considered by the Secretary.

Carson v. U.S. Office of Special Counsel

514 F. Supp. 2d 54 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 2007

BROida, A Guide To Merit Systems Protection Board Law & PRACTICE, CL 13 § IV.B.1 (2004). … Williams v.

Bradley v. Pevlar

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 2023

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). It appears that plaintiff, a resident of Capac, Michigan, is the guardian of a minor on whose behalf he manages the proceeds of a settlement.

Johnson v. United States Federal Government

District Court, District of Columbia · May 23, 2025

. § 8347(b), and any adverse decisions must first be appealed to the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”), id. § 8347(d)(1). … Brown v. Marsh, 77 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C. Cir. 1985).4 Exhaustion under Title VII and the ADEA is “non-jurisdictional,” so a plaintiff need not plead it. Bain, 648 F. Supp. 3d at 46 (citing Bowden v.

Moreno-Baltierra v. United States Health & Human Services

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 2, 2013

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2()09); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff purports to sue the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the States of Califomia and Kentucky, or agencies within those states.

Organic Trade Association v. United States Department of Agriculture

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2019

Fund, Inc. v. Espy, 29 F.3d 720, 726 (D.C. Cir. 1994); see, e.g., Arpaio v. Obama, 797 F.3d 11, 23 (D.C. … recommendations by this Board.”

Malone v. Norton

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2010

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661,668-7 1 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Cooper v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 2018

While the Board’s decision need not be “a model of analytic precision,” Dickson v. Sec’y of Defense, 68 F.3d 1396, 1404 (D.C. … In Fairchild v.

Fleming v. the Cherokee Nation

District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2019

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RHONDA LEONA BROWN FLEMING, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 18-02041 (TFH) V. THE CHEROKEE NATION, e¢ al. Defendants. … Fox v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 389 F.3d 1291, 1294 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The D.C.

Ferguson v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 19, 2009

On November 6, 2007, the Board of Arbitration declined to hear the merits of Ferguson's grievance because Local 689 filed the request in an untimely manner. … (quoting Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 (1984)).

Hudson v. Spencer

335 F. Supp. 3d 196 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2018

Mesnick v. Gen. Elec. Co. , 950 F.2d 816 , 822 (1st Cir. 1991) (quoting Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc. , 895 F.2d 46 , 50 (1st Cir. 1990) ). … . *200 O'Connor v. Steeves , 994 F.2d 905 , 907 (1st Cir. 1993).