Case law

United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 400 v. Dotson

628 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 1984

Citing Leedom v. … Citing Leedom v. Kyne, 358 U.S. 184 , 79 S.Ct. 180 , 3 L.Ed.2d 210 (1958), and Miami Newspaper Printing Pressmen’s Union Local 46 v.

Wilmoth v. United States

297 F. Supp. 1076 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 3, 1969

Wilmoth to the Board of Veterans Appeals. By decision dated February 3, 1966, the Board of Veterans Appeals found the wife, Florence J. … Wells v. Ruiz, 372 F.2d 119 (10th Cir. 1967). The facts in this case approach most closely those in Collins v.

ESTATE OF GAITHER EX REL. GAITHER v. District of Columbia

655 F. Supp. 2d 69 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 8, 2009

See Pl.’s Opp’n, Ex. 11 (Deposition Excerpt of Marvin Brown). … (quoting D.C. v. Brown, 589 A.2d 384, 388, n. 6 (D.C.1991)).

Lee v. Wolfson

265 F. Supp. 2d 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 8, 2003

Marshall County Health Care Auth. v. Shalala, 988 F.2d 1221, 1226, n. 6 (D.C.Cir.1993). See also Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 3 F.Supp.2d 1473, 1475 (D.D.C.1998). … See also East v.

United States v. Huff

279 F. Supp. 143 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 1967

E. g., Bailey v. United States, supra; Stephens v. United States, supra. . No. 19,614, D.C.Cir., May 20, 1966. See also Brown v. United States, 125 U.S. App.D.C. 43, 365 F.2d 976 (1966). . Emburgh v. … Dickerson v. United States, 120 A.2d 588 (D.C.Mun.App.1956). . Perry v. United States, 230 A.2d 721 (D. C. App.1967). . Brown v. United States, 125 U.S.App. D. C. 43, 365 F.2d 976, 979 (1966). . Ibid. See Bailey v.

Mallgren v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 2, 2025

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668- 71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Here, Plaintiff’s vague allegations fall well short of providing notice of any claim or establishing this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction.

Gamarra v. Obama

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 3, 2015

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 US. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (DC. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff is a District of Columbia resident. He has named President Barack Obama as the defendant.

Fisher v. Fulwood

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2011

Parole Board and directed the USPC to conduct parole hearings for D.C. Code offenders pursuant to the parole laws and regulations of the District of Columbia." Sellmon v. Reilly, 551 F. … Parole] Board to grant or deny parole and [] the regulations lack the sort of 'mandatory character' needed to support a liberty interest." Id. at 1419 (quoting McRae v. Hyman, 667 A.2d 1356,1357, 1367 (D.C. 1995)).

Lightfoot v. District of Columbia

273 F.R.D. 314 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 2011

Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. Cir. 2008). “Each inquiry is separate and serves different purposes.” Baker v. District of Columbia, 326 F.3d 1302, 1306 (D.C. Cir. 2003). … See Meijer, Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Holdings Co. III, Ltd., 246 F.R.D. 293, 300 (D.D.C. 2007); Brown v. Pro Football, Inc., 146 F.R.D. 1, 2 (D.D.C. 1992).

Beberman v. Blinken

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 2026

She also challenges other, related Board decisions, some of which she also challenged in this case; the Court resolved those claims in May 2025. … Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936); see Dietz v. Bouldin, 579 U.S. 40, 47 (2016). The court can thus issue a stay sua sponte. See Broidy Cap. Mgmt. LLC v.

Baystate Medical Center v. Leavitt

587 F. Supp. 2d 37 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 7, 2008

The same, of course, could be said for discovery, particularly in light of CMS’s longstanding position that the Board does not have the authority to compel CMS to comply with Board orders. … J. at 15, 20 n.6 (noting that CMS had refused to comply with Board subpoenas for SSI eligibility records). 7 . See, e.g., Amer. Iron & Steel Inst. v.

Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Bowser

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 7, 2022

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). A complaint should state a “short plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. of Civ. Proc. 8(a)(2). … Co. v. Twombly, 550 US 544, 555-56 (2007); Arpaio v. Obama, 797 F.3d 11, 19 (D.C. Cir. 2015); Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 US 662, 677-78 (2009).

Athens Community Hospital, Inc. v. Sullivan

815 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 1992

This argument is very similar to Universal Health Servs. of McAllen v. … Chevron, USA, Inc. v.

Chancellor v. Musk

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 20, 2025

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). “A confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.” Cheeks v. Fort Myer Constr. Corp., 71 F.

Kanazeh v. Randolph, Boyd, Cherry Pc

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 9, 2015

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff alleges in vague terms that defendant committed an “unlawful deceptive ac ,” which has caused her to be sued by the Commonwealth’s Attorney. Compl. at 1.

In Re: Navy Chaplaincy

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 30, 2018

Gibson v. … Act”); Wallace v.

Alexander v. Government of the District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 2020

Id.; see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Connick, 563 U.S. at 61, quoting Brown, 520 U.S. at 410 (internal quotation marks omitted).

Fernandez v. Gantz

113 F. Supp. 763 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 11, 1953

Ruth v. Witherspoon-Englar Co., 98 Kan. 179 , 157 P. 403 , L.R.A.1916E, 1201; Ellamar Mining Co. of Alaska v. Possus, 9 Cir., 247 F. 420 . … Sarber v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 9 Cir., 23 F.2d 434 , Brown v. Sinclair Refining Co., 86 Okl. 143 , 206 P. 1042 , and notes in 127 A.L.R. 1108 .

Kakeh v. United Planning Organization, Inc.

655 F. Supp. 2d 107 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 9, 2009

The Board decided to remove only Jennings. Id. … Yesudian v.

Baker, Watts & Co. v. Saxon

261 F. Supp. 247 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 14, 1966

. *249 Commercial State Bank of Roseville v. Gidney, D.C., 174 F.Supp. 770 , affirmed 108 U.S.App.D.C. 37 , 278 F.2d 871 ; National Bank of Detroit v. Wayne Oakland Bank, 252 F.2d 537 (6th C.). … On May 8, 1964, the Board of Governors reiterated its views on the subject, 12 C.F.R. § 208.109 as follows: “ * * *, the Board understands that phrase [i.e. general obligations] to include only obligations that are supported