Case law

Haleem v. Department of Defense

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 2025

Cir. 2011) (applying “risk of circumvention” standard to law- enforcement techniques and procedures as well as to guidelines) (quotation marks omitted); Mayer Brown LLP v. IRS, 562 F.3d 1190, 1193 (D.C. … See Mayer Brown LLP, 562 F.3d at 1193 (quotation marks omitted); Blackwell, 646 F.3d at 42.

Mid-Century, Limited v. United Cigar-Whelan St. Corp.

109 F. Supp. 433 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 23, 1953

Thus, in Jacobs v. J. C. … See Weltman’s Inc. v. Friedman, D.C., 102 F.Supp. 485, 487 ; Restatement of the Law of Contracts, secs. 12, 75, 90; Williston on Contracts, secs. 13, 102.

In Re: Navy Chaplaincy

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 30, 2018

Gibson v. … Act”); Wallace v.

United States v. Washington

38 F. Supp. 2d 21 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 5, 1999

Valentine Brown, an acknowledged expert in the illegal drug trade. … United States v. Gibbs, 904 F.2d 52, 57 (D.C.Cir.1990).

Deleon v. U.S. Airways, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 2014

See DeLeon v. U.S. … Decisions of the Appeals Board are then subject to review under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”). See PBGC v. LTV Corp., 496 U.S. 633, 636 (1990); Davis v.

Younger v. District of Columbia Public Schools

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 28, 2018

See Gross v. FBL Fin. … Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 252-53 (1981); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802 (1973); see also Barnette v. Chertoff, 453 F.3d 513, 515 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (shifting burden applies to ADEA claims).

United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 400 v. Dotson

628 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 1984

Citing Leedom v. … Citing Leedom v. Kyne, 358 U.S. 184 , 79 S.Ct. 180 , 3 L.Ed.2d 210 (1958), and Miami Newspaper Printing Pressmen’s Union Local 46 v.

ESTATE OF GAITHER EX REL. GAITHER v. District of Columbia

655 F. Supp. 2d 69 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 8, 2009

See Pl.’s Opp’n, Ex. 11 (Deposition Excerpt of Marvin Brown). … (quoting D.C. v. Brown, 589 A.2d 384, 388, n. 6 (D.C.1991)).

Lee v. Wolfson

265 F. Supp. 2d 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 8, 2003

Marshall County Health Care Auth. v. Shalala, 988 F.2d 1221, 1226, n. 6 (D.C.Cir.1993). See also Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 3 F.Supp.2d 1473, 1475 (D.D.C.1998). … See also East v.

Mallgren v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 2, 2025

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668- 71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Here, Plaintiff’s vague allegations fall well short of providing notice of any claim or establishing this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction.

Karrick v. Cantrill

290 F. 321 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 4, 1923

On a former appeal (Karrick et al. v. Cantrill et al., 51 App. D. C. 176, 277 Fed. 578 ) the decision of the commission was reversed, with 'costs, and the Lause remanded for-a rehearing.. … The commission is neither a board of appraisers, an arbitration board, nor,.as in Omaha v. Omaha Water Co., 218 U. S. 180 , 30 Sup. Ct. 615, 54 L. Ed. 991 , 48 L. R. A. (N.

Gamarra v. Obama

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 3, 2015

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 US. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (DC. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff is a District of Columbia resident. He has named President Barack Obama as the defendant.

Lemieux v. United States of America White House

District Court, District of Columbia · May 23, 2024

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEPHEN DANIEL LEMIEUX, Plaintiff, Case No. 24-cv-1056 (JMC) v. … ECF 2 at 2 (citing Brown v. WMATA, 164 F. Supp. 3d 33, 35 (D.D.C. 2016)).

Woubetu v. Dsk Mariam Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church People

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 19, 2023

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v.

Fisher v. Fulwood

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2011

Parole Board and directed the USPC to conduct parole hearings for D.C. Code offenders pursuant to the parole laws and regulations of the District of Columbia." Sellmon v. Reilly, 551 F. … Parole] Board to grant or deny parole and [] the regulations lack the sort of 'mandatory character' needed to support a liberty interest." Id. at 1419 (quoting McRae v. Hyman, 667 A.2d 1356,1357, 1367 (D.C. 1995)).

Lightfoot v. District of Columbia

273 F.R.D. 314 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 2011

Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. Cir. 2008). “Each inquiry is separate and serves different purposes.” Baker v. District of Columbia, 326 F.3d 1302, 1306 (D.C. Cir. 2003). … See Meijer, Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Holdings Co. III, Ltd., 246 F.R.D. 293, 300 (D.D.C. 2007); Brown v. Pro Football, Inc., 146 F.R.D. 1, 2 (D.D.C. 1992).

Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Bowser

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 7, 2022

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). A complaint should state a “short plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. of Civ. Proc. 8(a)(2). … Co. v. Twombly, 550 US 544, 555-56 (2007); Arpaio v. Obama, 797 F.3d 11, 19 (D.C. Cir. 2015); Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 US 662, 677-78 (2009).

Muwekma Ohlone Tribe v. Salazar

813 F. Supp. 2d 170 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2011

v. … See, e.g., Settles v. U.S.

Athens Community Hospital, Inc. v. Sullivan

815 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 1992

This argument is very similar to Universal Health Servs. of McAllen v. … Chevron, USA, Inc. v.

Chancellor v. Musk

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 20, 2025

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). “A confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.” Cheeks v. Fort Myer Constr. Corp., 71 F.