Case law

Ferebee v. Chevron Chemical Co.

552 F. Supp. 1293 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 20, 1982

Ferebee’s case was in fact unique rather than one of a few with this specific exposure, symptoms, and course was clearly a question for the jury to decide. It is clear, however, that cases exactly like Mr. … Crystal and Yusuf were both experts eminently qualified in pulmonary medicine. They were both among Mr.

Zhang v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 17, 2023

Rather, the Haselwander court clearly explained that it had considered “[t]he record in th[e] case” and held the “record . . . adequate to show that Haselwander’s net worth is less than $2 million.” … At the same time, Defendants’ evidence does not establish that Mr. Hagiwara’s net worth exceeded $2,000,000.

Creecy v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2011

Defendants argue that the challenged conduct cannot be considered “extreme and outrageous” because there was clearly probable cause for Creecy’s arrest. … This claim is not clearly meritless. See Payton v.

United Therapeutics Corporation v. Vanderbilt University

278 F. Supp. 3d 407 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 2017

’s home forum, we believe the answer clearly is that it cannot.”). … Cir. 1983) (concluding that the defendants’ appearances in the District “undoubtedly qualify as exercises in petitioning the government” and therefore “qualify for exemption” under the government contracts doctrine).

Pettaway v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of America

699 F. Supp. 2d 185 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2010

Even more plainly, the section of the Policy describing the participant’s rights under the ERISA clearly designates the Academy as the plan administrator. Id., at A.R. 138. … Thus, the SB Administrators also qualifies as a fiduciary by virtue of its role as the claims processor.

Freeman v. Phillips

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 12, 2020

as Plaintiff demanded monetary damages for alleged Bivens violations of his Fourth Amendment 1 rights, any such claims failed on the basis of sovereign and judicial immunity … Circuit has held that emotional trauma alone is sufficient to qualify as an 7 adverse effect under Section 552a(g)(1)(D) of the [Privacy] Act.”)

In re Swine Flu Immunization Products Liability Litigation

89 F.R.D. 695 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 16, 1980

Teams with specialties were established. There was substantial *704 delegation of responsibility under coordinated control. … In dollar value, the Guillain-Barre victims clearly will receive a great deal more compensation than all other victims of the swine flu program.

Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Rees

667 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 3, 1986

Thus where the factual dispute concerns actual malice, clearly a material issue in a New York Times case, the appropriate summary judgment question will be whether the evidence in the record could support a reasonable jury … A January 10, 1980 position paper issued by Liberty Lobby stated that the USLP should “qualify” for a “political alliance.” (Defendant’s Exhibit 16) 6.

United States v. Armstead

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 10, 2020

Mar. 27, 2020) (holding that a district court qualifies as a “judicial officer” for purposes of § 3145(c)). 3 Section 3143(a)(1), in 2 The court takes no position, at this time, on whether the spread of COVID-19 within … And, although the jury did not reach verdicts on the counts concerning Sadie or obstruction, the court found Sadie’s testimony to be compelling and more than sufficient to establish that Defendant presents a danger to Sadie

Burns Ramirez v. Napolitano

962 F. Supp. 2d 253 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 27, 2013

ANALYSIS The Secret Service asserts that the Security Clearance claims are nonjusticiable under Supreme Court law established in Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518 (1988). Mr. … The Circuit found this concern insufficient to justify “sweeping immunity from Title VII,” noting that “though allegations of knowing falsity may be easy to make, they are, in our experience, far from easy to prove.

Doyle v. England

193 F. Supp. 2d 202 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2002

Doyle] admitted to egregious behavior that clearly established his unfitness for promotion. There is no evidence that the other officer cited by the BCNR was personally engaged in the same behavior as [Mr. … The Assistant Secretary then offered legitimate explanations for her decision to reject the BCNR’s recommendation: namely, that the plaintiff admitted to egregious behavior that “clearly established his unfitness for promotion

Bonnette v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals

796 F. Supp. 2d 164 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 2011

A public entity may not administer a licensing or certification program in a manner that subjects qualified individuals with disabilities to discrimination on the basis of disability, nor may a public entity establish requirements … However, § 12189 clearly applies to “any person” that offers examinations, not just public accommodations.

Amador County v. Jewell

312 F.R.D. 11 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 4, 2013

The County filed this action in 2005, challenging the Secretary’s approval of the amended compact on the ground that the Ranchería does not qualify as “Indian land” under the IGRA. See generally Compl. (Dkt # 1). … The Tribe also seeks to protect and assert “its sovereign immunity from suit and its sovereign right to govern and develop the Ranche-ría.” Id. at 7.

Wachsman v. Islamic Republic of Iran

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2009

once the plaintiffs demonstrate that an exception to immunity applies and effect service of process. … Clearly, the plaintiffs have suffered a great deal of distress in the aftermath of Nachshon’s kidnapping and murder.

Lazaridis v. Social Security Administration

856 F. Supp. 2d 93 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 19, 2012

Lazaridis can appear pro se but is not qualified to appear as counsel for others.” Id. (citing Georgiades v. Martin-Trigona, 729 F.2d 831, 834 (D.C. Cir. 1984); Delaney v. Dist. of Columbia, 612 F. … The futility exception only applies where exhaustion would be “clearly useless,” such as where the agency “has indicated that it does not have jurisdiction over the dispute, or because it has evidenced a strong stand on

Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC. v. Becerra

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 3, 2025

The Medicare Modernization Act’s Original Framework (2003) The Medicare Modernization Act established a framework to allocate the cost of covered drugs among beneficiaries, insurance companies, and drug manufacturers … “When an agency raises a purely legal argument for the first time in litigation, a court may consider that argument if it is both clearly correct and would render remand pointless

Skelton v. Action

668 F. Supp. 25 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 3, 1987

Existence of Genuine Issues of Material Fact An application of the principles of law outlined above to the instant case clearly supports a determination that summary judgment should be entered for defendants. … ACTION is an independent federal agency established within the executive branch to assist in the provision of services to the poor, disadvantaged, and elderly. 2 .

Barry v. Islamic Republic of Iran

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 4, 2020

The terrorism exception establishes “that a foreign state is not immune in ‘any case’ in which ‘money damages are sought against a foreign state for personal injury or death that was caused by an act of torture, extrajudicial … Cir. 2008), rev’d on other grounds, 556 U.S. 848 (2009)); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1606 (stating that, once waiver of sovereign immunity is established under section 1605, “the 37 Because, as the Court established

Wilkinson v. Legal Services Corp.

27 F. Supp. 2d 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 1998

Laws enacted through formal processes clearly are binding. … Rather, the Accardi doctrine establishes that the rule of law is to be reasonably enforced.

Seminole Pipeline Co. v. Vogt

794 F. Supp. 438 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 1992

As Plaintiff acknowledges in its papers, the NTSB has broad power to establish “rules and regulations as may be necessary to the exercise of its function.” 49 U.S.C.App. § 1901. … See Exhibit N, attached to the Plaintiffs Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. 3 .The Rule provides that “[p]arties shall be represented by suitable qualified technical employees or members who