Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
8.52s
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2011
Parole Board and directed the USPC to conduct parole hearings for D.C. Code offenders pursuant to the parole laws and regulations of the District of Columbia." Sellmon v. Reilly, 551 F. … Parole] Board to grant or deny parole and [] the regulations lack the sort of 'mandatory character' needed to support a liberty interest." Id. at 1419 (quoting McRae v. Hyman, 667 A.2d 1356,1357, 1367 (D.C. 1995)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedFrederick v. Montgomery County Police Dept.
District Court, District of Columbia · May 15, 2026
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The instant Complaint does not provide the Defendants or the Court with adequate notice of a claim.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 2010
BATOOL KHAKSARI ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Tomlinson, in his official capacity, as Chairman of the Broadcasting Board of Governors.
Cited 0 timesPublished539 F. Supp. 2d 24 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 2008
See Cone v. Caldera, 223 F.3d 789, 793 (D.C.Cir.2000) (applying an “unusually deferential application” of the APA standard to a decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records); Kreis v. … Laningham v. U.S.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGreenpeace, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Company
808 F. Supp. 2d 262 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 9, 2011
The Individual Defendants were all managers for Becket Brown International, Inc. … From his position on the board, Mr.
Cited 5 timesPublished752 F. Supp. 509 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 1990
In Harisiades v. … In United States v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedHoward University v. District of Columbia
155 F.2d 10 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 1946
Washington University v. Rouse, 8 Wall. 439 , 19 L.Ed. 498 ; Washington University v. Baumann, 341 Mo. 708 , 108 S.W.2d 403 ; St. Anna’s Asylum v. … In Vanderbilt University v. Cheney, 116 Tenn. 259 , 94 S.W. 90 , and Woonsocket Hospital v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBurlington Ins. Co. v. Okie Dokie, Inc.
329 F. Supp. 2d 45 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 2, 2004
Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156 , 165 *48 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 .
Cited 13 timesPublishedUnited States ex rel. Shea v. Verizon Communications, Inc.
160 F. Supp. 3d 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 6, 2015
However, on June 1, 2015, the Supreme Court vacated the Court of Appeals’ Judgment and remanded the case for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. … On July 17, 2015, the Court “remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion in Kellogg Brown & Root v. United States ex rel. Carter ” [Dkt. No. 77]. D.
Cited 23 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 14, 2011
James David Nanney, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION In what the Court has construed as a motion, plaintiff, a prisoner at the Brown
Cited 0 timesPublished265 F. Supp. 2d 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 8, 2003
Marshall County Health Care Auth. v. Shalala, 988 F.2d 1221, 1226, n. 6 (D.C.Cir.1993). See also Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 3 F.Supp.2d 1473, 1475 (D.D.C.1998). … See also East v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedBradley Memorial Hospital v. Leavitt
599 F. Supp. 2d 6 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2009
. § 1395oo, the provider may file an appeal with the Provider Review Reimbursement Board (“the Board”). … Ctr. v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Dec 2, 2025
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668- 71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Here, Plaintiff’s vague allegations fall well short of providing notice of any claim or establishing this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · May 13, 2025
Generally, “the National Labor Relations Board [NLRB] has exclusive primary jurisdiction over claims involving unfair labor practices.” Price v. Unite Here Local 25, 883 F. … Brown, No. 94-cv-1018, 1996 WL 79490, at *4 (D.D.C. Feb. 16, 1996); Rattner v. Bennett, 701 F. Supp. 7, 9 (D.D.C. 1988). Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Oct 5, 2022
See Barcomb v. Gen. … See Harris v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRamey v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
580 F. Supp. 2d 44 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 2008
Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 , 127 S.Ct. 1955, 1965 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007); Holy Land Found., for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Taylor v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedGrant Medical Center v. Hargan
875 F.3d 701 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 17, 2017
The Provider Reimbursement Review Board (PRRB)—the body responsible for initially hearing Medicare reimbursement disputes—rejected the Hospitals’ claim. See OhioHealth 2004 Clark Bed Days Group v. … (quoting Givens v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, 720 F.2d 196, 200 (D.C. Cir. 1983))).
Cited 7 timesPublishedNational Parks and Conservation Ass'n v. Morton
351 F. Supp. 404 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 4, 1972
Getman v. National Labor Relations Board, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 209 , 450 F.2d 670, 673 (1971); Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. … Renegotiation Board, 138 U.S.App.D.C. 147 , 425 *407 F.2d 578, 582 (1970); M. A. Schapiro & Co., Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Com’n, 339 F.Supp. 467 (D.D.C.1972).
Cited 5 timesPublishedWilson v. Prudential Financial
332 F. Supp. 2d 83 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 2004
Macharía v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found, for Relief & Development v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren, 353 F.3d at 39 ; Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . 2.
Cited 39 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2010
Sullivan v. … A.O. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna