Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.58s
224 F. Supp. 2d 72 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 2002
Six years later, the District of Columbia Parole Board (“Parole Board”) released the petitioner on parole. Id. On June 29, 1999, the petitioner was arrested and' charged with assault with intent to kill. Id. … As a result, the Parole Board issued a parole detainer warrant. Petition at 3.
Cited 6 timesPublishedFireman's Fund Insurance v. CTIA—The Wireless Ass'n
480 F. Supp. 2d 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 13, 2007
Armature Works found additional support for punitive damages in the fact that, "like the real estate broker in Brown v. … Id. at 292 (citing Brown, 253 F.2d at 39 ).
Cited 25 timesPublishedNational Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 2021
Burne Hogarth v. … See Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guar.
Cited 0 timesPublished79 F. Supp. 919 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 19, 1940
This decree is in full force and effect (Parks v. … Tipping v. Tipping, 65 App.D.C. 222 , 82 F.2d 828 .
Reversed on other grounds by Parks v. Parks, 116 F.2d 556 (1940)Cited 1 timesPublishedDeville v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 6, 2023
See Fisher v. PBGC, 994 F.3d 664, 667 (D.C. Cir. 2021); PBGC v. R.A. Gray & Co., 467 U.S. 717, 720 (1984). … Consulting, Inc. v. Wilde, 920 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Abu Khatallah
275 F. Supp. 3d 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 16, 2017
; United States v. … The paradigmatic cases of involuntariness involve tactics such as physical beatings, see Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 (1936), and the use of drugs akin to truth serums, see Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293 (1963).
Cited 6 timesPublishedAssociation of Flight Attendants v. USAir, Inc.
807 F. Supp. 827 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 30, 1992
In deciding an analogous dispute, the court in Air Transport Employees v. Western Airlines quoted from two annual reports of the NMB explaining the Board’s position on the issue. … In 1935, the Board wrote: When there is an agreement in effect between a carrier and its employees signed by one set of representatives and the employees choose new representatives who are certified by the Board, the Board
Cited 2 timesPublished38 F. Supp. 2d 21 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 5, 1999
Valentine Brown, an acknowledged expert in the illegal drug trade. … United States v. Gibbs, 904 F.2d 52, 57 (D.C.Cir.1990).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArmenian Genocide Museum and Memorial Inc v. Cafesjian Family Foundation Inc
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2010
See, e.g., Storetrax.com, Inc. v. … Second, CFF contends that the Building and Operations Committee cannot authorize lawsuits without specific involvement from the Board. Citing Stern v.
Cited 0 timesPublished136 F. Supp. 315 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 1955
In Fremont v. … In Adam v.
Cited 1 timesPublished173 F. Supp. 493 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 18, 1959
Harmon v. Brucker, supra; United States ex rel. Toth v. Quarles, 1955, 350 U.S. 11 , 76 S.Ct. 1 , 100 L.Ed. 8 . … Griffin v. United States, D.C.Ark.1953, 115 F.Supp. 509 , 514 citing United States v. Kelly, 1873, 15 Wall. 34 , 82 U.S. 34 , 21 L.Ed. 106 .
Vacated by Monte M. Olenick v. Wilbur M. Brucker, Secretary of the Department of the Army, 273 F.2d 819 (1959)Cited 3 timesPublishedCason v. National Football League Players Association
District Court, District of Columbia · May 7, 2021
(“Retirement Board”) and NFL Player Disability and Neurocognitive Benefit Plan Board (“Disability Board”)—collectively, “the Boards”—are the Plans’ fiduciaries. … More, the fiduciary responsibilities of the bargaining parties over the Board trustees might be narrower than Plaintiffs contend. Cf. NLRB v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFranklin v. District of Columbia
960 F. Supp. 394 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 16, 1997
Ramos, 639 F.2d at 575 ; Madrid v. Gomez, 889 F.Supp. at 1257 ; Balia v. Idaho State Board of Corrections, 595 F.Supp. 1558, 1577 (D.Idaho 1984); Lightfoot v. Walker, 486 F.Supp. 504, 524-25 (S.D.Ill.1980). … See Sandin v.
Reversed on other grounds by Robert Franklin v. District of Columbia, 163 F.3d 625 (1999)Cited 8 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Oct 20, 2025
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). “A confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.” Cheeks v. Fort Myer Constr. Corp., 71 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKourouma v. United States Government
District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 18, 2024
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The Court has reviewed all of plaintiff’s filings and has not identified a viable legal claim.
Cited 0 timesPublished470 F. Supp. 777 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 31, 1979
Quoting Norton v. … In Norton v. Macy, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 214 , 220, 417 F.2d 1161, 1167 (1969), the Court of Appeals directly addressed the issue raised by Mr. Yacovone’s appeal.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 5, 2009
Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 550 U.S. 544, 127 S. Ct. 1955, 1964 (2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)). … Miller v. Dep’t of Navy, 476 8 F.3d 936, 938 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (quoting Cone v. Caldera, 223 F.3d 789, 793 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (quoting Kreis v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHaleem v. Department of Defense
District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 2025
Cir. 2011) (applying “risk of circumvention” standard to law- enforcement techniques and procedures as well as to guidelines) (quotation marks omitted); Mayer Brown LLP v. IRS, 562 F.3d 1190, 1193 (D.C. … See Mayer Brown LLP, 562 F.3d at 1193 (quotation marks omitted); Blackwell, 646 F.3d at 42.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Oct 28, 2025
Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … employee, K-AY, was also asked to resign as a board member of an Employee Affinity Group,” id. ¶ 52.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 2010
BATOOL KHAKSARI ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Tomlinson, in his official capacity, as Chairman of the Broadcasting Board of Governors.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna