Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.31s
132 F. Supp. 533 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 23, 1955
Smith, Medical Director and chief of psychiatric service at that institution, both members of the Springfield Board, who examined defendant on September 24, 1954. Defendant Fooks also testified. … In connection with such a motion, our Court of Appeals has recently stated in Bishop v. United States, D.C.Cir., 223 F.2d 582 : “The burden of proof [is] upon * * * the movant.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMizlou Television Network, Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co.
603 F. Supp. 677 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 30, 1984
Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477, 488 , 97 S.Ct. 690, 697 , 50 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977); Brown Shoe Co. v. … See Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. at 325 , 82 S.Ct. at 1523 ; Southern Pacific Communications Co. v. American Telegraph and Telephone Co., 556 F.Supp. 825 (D.D.C.1983), affd. 740 F.2d 980 (D.C.
Cited 19 timesPublishedYoung v. Netherlands Owners, Inc.
306 F. Supp. 1282 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 14, 1969
Affidavit of Pauline Frances Trezevant, Young v. Netherlands Owners, Inc., C.A. No. 2660-09 (D.D.C., filed Sept. 17, 1969). . Intervenor’s Complaint for Injunction ¶ 11 at p. 3., Young v. Netherland Owners, Inc., C.A. … Industrial Bank of Washington v. Tobriner, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 51, 54 , 405 F.2d 1321, 1324 (1968). . Sawyer v. United States Steel Co., 90 U.S.App.D.C. 416 , 197 F.2d 582 (1952). .
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2018
Cir. 1997) (Air Force selective early retirement board); Paylor v. Winter, 600 F. … Cl. 826 (Air Force promotion selection board); Christensen v. United States, 65 Fed. Cl. 625 (2005) (Air Force selective early retirement board); Alvin v. United States, 50 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedConax Florida Corp. v. United States
625 F. Supp. 1324 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 23, 1985
Megapulse v. Lewis, 672 F.2d 959, 967-68 (D.C.Cir.1982). … No. 31966) before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals.
Cited 6 timesPublished847 F. Supp. 2d 28 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2012
When making decisions regarding which employees to promote, the Department of State convokes a Foreign Service Selection Board (“Promotion Board”). Id. ¶¶ 6-7. … Neither the 2004 Promotion Board nor the 2005 Promotion Board recommended the plaintiff for promotion. Def.’s Stmt. of Facts ¶¶ 6-7.
Cited 16 timesPublishedNorfolk Southern Railway Company v. Solis
District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 3, 2013
Co. v. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKakeh v. United Planning Organization, Inc.
655 F. Supp. 2d 107 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 9, 2009
The Board decided to remove only Jennings. Id. … Yesudian v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedKrause International, Inc. v. Reed Elsevier, Inc.
866 F. Supp. 585 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 31, 1994
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Sears Financial Network, 576 F.Supp. 857, 864 (D.D.C.1983). … However, defendant invokes the doctrine of primary jurisdiction to move for a stay on grounds of judicial efficiency because the Board’s decision will “materially aid” a judicial determination. See Ricci v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedIglesias v. United States Agency for International Development
District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 12, 2018
Colls. & Sch. v. DeVos, 303 F. Supp. 3d 77, 111–12 (D.D.C. 2018) (citation omitted). The Board’s decision easily clears that hurdle. … in Douglas v.
Cited 0 timesPublished807 F. Supp. 2d 28 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 12, 2011
Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). In considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), a court relating to the ACA and Freedom Watch’s claims are moot. … See Burton v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedUniversity Medical Center, Inc. v. Sebelius
856 F. Supp. 2d 66 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 17, 2012
The Secretary's interpretation, not the Board's, is the final decision of the agency. See, e.g., Am. Med. Int'l, Inc. v. Sec'y of Health, Educ. and Welfare, 466 F. … V.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · May 31, 2020
See Vasser v. McDonald, 2016 WL 7480263, at *6 (D.D.C. Dec. 29, 2016); see also Williams v. Chu, 641 F. … Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouis-Alexandre Noel Albert Dalbis v. France
District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 23, 2024
See Dalbis v. Pub. Emps. of Sec. & Intel. Servs. of Fr. & Eur. (Dalbis I), No. 24-cv-1434 (JMC). … And while “[o]rdinarily, the remedy for noncompliance with Rule 8(a) is dismissal with leave to amend,” Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished253 F. Supp. 3d 244 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 26, 2017
One Board official, Dennis DeGaetano, concurred with the Board’s recommendation because Lockheed had the best bid, even though it cost slightly more than one other proposal. Def. Facts ¶ 94. … Bartlette v. Hyatt Regency, 208 F. Supp. 3d 311, 321-22 (D.D.C. 2016) (quoting Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1022 (D.C. Cir. 2014)).
Cited 18 timesPublishedManigault-Speaks v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 21, 2020
Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 835 (1976); see Coulibaly v. Pompeo, 318 F. Supp. 3d 176, 185 (D.D.C. 2018), quoting Hamilton v. District of Columbia, 720 F. … Count V must therefore be dismissed as well. See Kizas, 707 F.2d at 542 (“The Title VII remedy declared exclusive for federal employees in Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished935 F. Supp. 2d 164 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2013
Ascom Hasler Mailing Sys., Inc. v. United States Postal Serv., 815 F. Supp. 2d 148, 156 (D.D.C. 2011) (quoting Scolaro v. D.C. Board of Elections & Ethics, 104 F. … Bell v. Donley, 724 F. Supp. 2d 1, 9 (D.D.C. 2010); see also Brown v. District of Columbia, 251 F.
Cited 32 timesPublished715 F. Supp. 2d 142 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 7, 2010
Ctr. v. … V.
Cited 15 timesPublishedAmeen v. U.S. Department of State
District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 2021
In so holding, Smallwood distinguished Brown v. EPA, 384 F. … Brown, 384 F. Supp. 2d at 276. Defendants cite Wetzel v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs, 949 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Nov 3, 2022
See id. at 21–22; Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 51 (1979). Mr. … The Court determines whether the causal chain has become “too attenuated” by considering three factors the Supreme Court outlined in Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna