Case law

Greenpeace, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Company

808 F. Supp. 2d 262 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 9, 2011

The Individual Defendants were all managers for Becket Brown International, Inc. … From his position on the board, Mr.

Kingman Park Civic Association v. Gray

956 F. Supp. 2d 230 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 2013

Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497, 499 (1954); Dixon v. District of Columbia, 666 F.3d 1337, 1339 (D.C. … Jones v. Helms, 452 U.S. 412, 423-424 (1981).

Campbell v. United States Parole, Commission

543 F. Supp. 2d 11 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 29, 2008

Board of Parole (“Board”) issued a violation warrant seeking his return to custody. (Resp’t Ex. C.) After a revocation hearing, the Board revoked Campbell’s parole on October 7, 1985. (Resp’t Ex. D.) … Lawson v.

Auyda, Inc. v. Attorney General

661 F. Supp. 33 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 1987

National Cable Television Association v. FCC, 554 F.2d 1094, 1108 (D.C.Cir.1976) (emphasis in original); see also Air Transport Association of America v. CAB, 732 F.2d 219 (D.C.Cir.1984). … The fees are no greater than the rough actual cost of providing the services and for two significant services — appeals to the Board of Immigration and motions to reopen or reconsider a decision of the Board — the fees are

Verplanck v. England

257 F. Supp. 2d 182 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 9, 2003

Musengo v. White, 286 F.3d 535, 538 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citing Kreis v. Sec’y. of the Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1514 (D.C.Cir.1989)); Cone v. Caldera, 223 F.3d 789, 792-93 (D.C.Cir.2000). … Forest Guardians v. Babbitt, 174 F.3d 1178, 1187 (10th Cir.1999) (citing United States v.

Phelps v. Stomber

883 F. Supp. 2d 233 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 2012

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002); Kowal, 16 F.3d at 1276. … Rubke v.

Coalition for Legal Services v. Legal Services Corp.

597 F. Supp. 198 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 26, 1984

Therefore, persons perusing the bulletin boards could have read the cancellation notice, logically ceased to look further and therefore missed the notice which rescheduled the Board meeting. … Coyne Delany Co. v. Capital Development Board of the State of Illinois, 717 F.2d 385 (7th Cir.1983); Page Communications Engineers, Inc. v. Froehlke, 475 F.2d 994 (D.C.Cir.1973).

King v. Fay

169 F. Supp. 934 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 4, 1958

In support of his position, he cites the case of Brown v. … Gmelin v. Gmelin, 37 N.W.2d 561 , at page 563. Thus, under Michigan law, the decree insofar as it relates to the property settlement is a final decree, and under the ruling of Brown v.

Saratoga Development Corp. v. United States

777 F. Supp. 29 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 31, 1991

Steinthal & Co. v. … When at full strength, the PADC Board consists of 15 voting members. The 13 ballots cast in this vote reflect the fact that one Board member had recused himself and there was one vacancy on the Board.

Bailey v. DiMario

925 F. Supp. 801 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 1995

Nasem v. Brown, 595 F.2d 801, 806 (D.C.Cir.1979). … Association v. Board of Governors, 900 F.2d 360, 364 (D.C.Cir.1990); I.A.M. National, 723 F.2d at 946-47 ; Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 27, comment c.

Lake Medical Center v. Shalala

89 F. Supp. 2d 83 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 2000

.” 42 U.S.C. § 1395x(v)(l)(0)(i). … v.

Morgan v. District of Columbia

647 F. Supp. 694 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 30, 1986

District of Columbia Board of Parole, 734 F.2d 56, 62 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1127 , 105 S.Ct. 811 , 83 L.Ed.2d 804 (1985); Lucas v. … Brandon, 631 F.Supp. at 438 ; (quoting Baumann v. Arizona Department of Corrections, 754 F.2d 841, 843 (9th Cir.1985)); see also Hewitt, 459 U.S. at 471-72 , 103 S.Ct. at 871-872 ; Connecticut Board of Pardons v.

Mann-Paller Foundation, Inc. v. Econometric Research, Inc.

644 F. Supp. 92 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 1986

.”); Lengsfield v. … It is settled law in Delaware, and elsewhere, that the declaration and payment of a dividend rests in the discretion of a corporation’s board of directors in the exercise of its business judgment. Gabelli & Co. v.

Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Export-Import Bank of the United States

85 F. Supp. 3d 387 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2015

United States v. Am. … For example, in Lopez v.

Mizlou Television Network, Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co.

603 F. Supp. 677 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 30, 1984

Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477, 488 , 97 S.Ct. 690, 697 , 50 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977); Brown Shoe Co. v. … See Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. at 325 , 82 S.Ct. at 1523 ; Southern Pacific Communications Co. v. American Telegraph and Telephone Co., 556 F.Supp. 825 (D.D.C.1983), affd. 740 F.2d 980 (D.C.

Koch v. Donaldson

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 6, 2011

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999). … Brown, 199 F.3d at 457.

National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 2021

Burne Hogarth v. … See Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guar.

Brighthaupt v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 2, 2014

Brighthaupt, et al. v. … Brighthaupt, et al. v.

Joseph v. McFerran

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2024

Board”). … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)).

Barry v. West Ex Rel. Estate of West

503 F. Supp. 2d 313 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 2007

Aug.29, 2006) (“Barry II”)- Barry v. … See Kemmerer v.